SierraTM Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 il y a 16 minutes, moos54 a dit : Without wanting to be mean, I believe that you have just demonstrated to everyone how far your intelligence can go, and I believe that it does not exceed the belt Oh my intelligence is definitely and by far, lower than yours. I stand in awe of your presence and I long to worship your intelligence. You are so kind and so helpful and filled with RLC knowledge. And as always, you are always correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moos54 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 9 minutes ago, SierraTM said: Oh my intelligence is definitely and by far, lower than yours. I stand in awe of your presence and I long to worship your intelligence. You are so kind and so helpful and filled with RLC knowledge. And as always, you are always correct. sorry to want to question your intelligence again there are at least three of us who want to explain to you that in the current context, that is to say a planetary health problem that we call pandemic and which is simply killing thousands of people , having Assol and Amelie at B4 will always be better than having empty beds, because it is surely impossible to replace them at the moment We understood that you wanted girls who masturbate all the times, but you will not have them, you will have to get used to this idea 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noldus Posted April 1, 2020 Author Share Posted April 1, 2020 It is not easy to satisfy everyone Some want the most real life possible and that's maybe what A&A is showing now Others want more sexual activities as more of the girls do - and some of them too much. Some want guys in the girls (GOV) apartments and some want the couples apartments (COV) to be roommates apartments. Fortunately, we have a good mix of all the past, so just pick what you want to lock at 😉 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nagachilli2 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 54 minutes ago, SierraTM said: RLC can still provide them housing but get them off the project. You still don't see my point, these girls have been doing absolutely nothing, showing us absolutely nothing (not even a pussy look if i were to believe) before the virus ran riot in Europe. And what RLC will do is so just let it be until they can't leave. That's it. Easy money. What makes you believe RLC can provide them with alternative housing in Barca? ...It would cost RLC more to re-house them than to keep them in the project because, in your own words, they do absolutely nothing, so wouldn't need to pay them any bonus money, just the basic. ...And would you really prefer to look at an empty room? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SierraTM Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 il y a 1 minute, Noldus a dit : It is not easy to satisfy everyone Some want the most real life possible and that's maybe what A&A is showing now Others want more sexual activities as more of the girls do - and some of them too much. Some want guys in the girls (GOV) apartments and some want the couples apartments (COV) to be roommates apartments. Fortunately, we have a good mix of all the past, so just pick what you want to lock at 😉 Noldus, I just want girls who are in this project, be willing to 'create sexual content' and not do absolutely nothing and hang around until their time is up. Such girls should have no place in this project. This should not even be a preference, like the ones you mention, this should be the minimum requirement. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SierraTM Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 il y a 2 minutes, nagachilli2 a dit : What makes you believe RLC can provide them with alternative housing in Barca? ...It would cost RLC more to re-house them than to keep them in the project because, in your own words, they do absolutely nothing, so wouldn't need to pay them any bonus money, just the basic. ...And would you really prefer to look at an empty room? You misunderstood me. I believe RLC works this way (correct me if I am wrong). When they remove the names of the girls but these girls still stay in the house, they are off the project. And would you really prefer to look at an empty room? Of cos I don't Naga, but in all fairness, what there's to see anyway? And this 'empty room' argument is doing subscribers no favours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bnvhdsh29 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 4 minutes ago, SierraTM said: You misunderstood me. I think everybody here understands you just fine. We just don’t understand why you can’t seem to get that your standards for participation on this project are yours and yours alone. So Sierra, you tell us that our explanation (A&A are difficult to replace) is not logical. So then you tell us. Why are they still there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SierraTM Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 il y a 2 minutes, bnvhdsh29 a dit : I think everybody here understands you just fine. We just don’t understand why you can’t seem to get that your standards for participation on this project are yours and yours alone. So Sierra, you tell us that our explanation (A&A are difficult to replace) is not logical. So then you tell us. Why are they still there? I repeat my point again. Which is, why are they still in this project? And please read my reply to Naga, which you happily leave out the rest 😏 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed2 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 24 minutes ago, SierraTM said: If they are in a porn project, which means sexual content, and they do 'no sexual content', are they refusing to work? Are they merely less productive? And the girls are there to do sexual acts. If they are not, this website will ceases to exist. Especially when the 'pornhubs of the Interent' are pushing out all kinds of porn content (hidden & non-hidden voyeurism) and mostly for free. I see that our disagreement is on the issue of should employer retain non-working, or in your words, less-productive employees so that the desk will be filled and at least the office looks packed and other employees can make friends etc. In RLC's context, at least they have something to show on their cameras. I don't disagree with this except when you already know that these girls will not do any sexual content and will not even get naked (other than showering). When you keep girls who do some sexual content occasionally, once in awhile, longer than you probably should, I can't complain because your logic stands. But when you keep girls who do absolutely nothing, your logic don't stand. I believe this is the root of our disagreement. It is more comparable to a TV channel than a factory line. It is better to sign up a trashy show than having a blanck screen! Keeping them is the only option for the time being. The question one can ask though, is why they never do better casting in the first place. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SierraTM Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 il y a 2 minutes, ed2 a dit : It is more comparable to a TV channel than a factory line. It is better to sign up a trashy show than having a blanck screen! Keeping them is the only option for the time being. The question one can ask though, is why they never do better casting in the first place. Well right now, since they are not going to be dropped off this project, this is the best scenario one (or rather I) can hope 🙁 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bnvhdsh29 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 3 minutes ago, SierraTM said: I repeat my point again. Which is, why are they still in this project? And please read my reply to Naga, which you happily leave out the rest 😏 That isn’t a point. That is a question which we gave you an answer to which you claim is illogical. So now I want to know your reason for RLC keeping them. What about the rest or your post? Some weird question about keeping their names on the room? You admitting that that they are better then an empty room (which is our whole point!) but then making a snide remark which is a matter of personal preference. I didn’t include the rest of your post because I see no reason to refute what are your personal preferences regarding participation in this project. I’m not going to talk you out of those and nor do I think anybody needs to. But they don’t have anything todo with the question you asked. Why are they still there? So one last time Sierra, why do you think RLC continues to keep A&A in the house and on the project? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed2 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 🚿❤️ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts