Discussion:2019 Novel Corona Virus (Covid19) and It's Political Ramifications #3

[Dave 27]

4 hours ago, Robwin said:

Now now pal getting political doesn't suit you 🤣 You should be more worried about all the idiots crowding on the beaches and parks.

I will definitely be replying to this one bud,but not tonight.

[Robwin]

3 minutes ago, Dave 27 said:

I will definitely be replying to this one bud,but not tonight.

I await your special attention 👍

[happyone]

6 minutes ago, Dave 27 said:

I will definitely be replying to this one bud,but not tonight.

 

3 minutes ago, Robwin said:

I await your special attention 👍

Hey Dave---I give you permission to just copy and paste my response to him earlier 😆

[Dave 27]

2 minutes ago, happyone said:

 

Hey Dave---I give you permission to just copy and paste my response to him earlier 😆

Thanks Happy but could you tell me which page it's on,I'm a lazy sod.!!!😀👍

[Dave 27]

21 hours ago, letsdothis said:

You guys are comparing apples and oranges. Moos and Starlight are
referring to large, randomized, controlled, clinical trials. In other words,
scientific research and statistical evidence, while Ridgerunner is
talking about anecdotal data.

The difference is like night and day. Anecdotal data unreliable at
determining factual claims. That's a big reason why they initiate
large, randomized, controlled, clinical trials. Anecdotal data is based
on hearsay, not hard evidence.

Examples of anecdotal data would be, I know a guy who...or, on my
way home I saw...or, I heard that HCQ is good for...

Or, when a doctor has 20 patients, all with identical symptoms and
diagnosed with the same illness. So, the doctor treats them all with
the same medication. Let's say 14 of his patients got better, so the
doctor concludes that the medication works, when in fact he doesn't
know anything more, for sure, than before he prescribed the medication.
It might have been the medicine that made them better or it could have
been any one of, or combination of, a 1000 different variables.

That's why there are these large, randomized, controlled, clinical trials,
to provide the actual, factual data to prove what works and what does
not. Plus, everyone knows the FDA is never going to approve the use of
a drug in this country based on anecdotal data or what some other
country claims works, whether it's based on anecdotal or statistical
evidence.

Ridgerunner, I know you desperately need CQ or HCQ to be effective
at treating COVID-19 and I think everyone here knows why that is. You
don't want your lord and master to lose face, yet AGAIN. However, the
truth is you will never be able to prove your case using anecdotal data.

Your good Let's buddy😀👍👍👍

[happyone]

4 minutes ago, Dave 27 said:

Thanks Happy but could you tell me which page it's on,I'm a lazy sod.!!!😀👍

Page 37 top of page---we can just both wait together 🤣

[Thestarider]

31 minutes ago, StnCld316 said:

 

Number of deaths for leading causes of death:

• Heart disease: 647,457
• Cancer: 599,108
• Accidents (unintentional injuries): 169,936
• Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 160,201
• Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 146,383
• Alzheimer’s disease: 121,404
• Diabetes: 83,564
• Influenza and Pneumonia: 55,672
• Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis: 50,633
• Intentional self-harm (suicide): 47,173
• Life must go on and as much as we think we should live forever we do not.

[Robwin]

20 minutes ago, happyone said:

 

Hey Dave---I give you permission to just copy and paste my response to him earlier 😆

Shit stirring sod 🤣🤭

[moos54]

1 minute ago, Thestarider said:

Number of deaths for leading causes of death:

• Heart disease: 647,457
• Cancer: 599,108
• Accidents (unintentional injuries): 169,936
• Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 160,201
• Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 146,383
• Alzheimer’s disease: 121,404
• Diabetes: 83,564
• Influenza and Pneumonia: 55,672
• Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis: 50,633
• Intentional self-harm (suicide): 47,173
• Life must go on and as much as we think we should live forever we do not.

All of this only in two months too as covid?

[Robwin]

3 minutes ago, moos54 said:

All of this only in two months too as covid?

Obviously some people got nothing better to do 🤣😁🤭

[Thestarider]

14 minutes ago, moos54 said:

All of this only in two months too as covid?

We all going to die of something moos, I will not put my life on hold because some politician tells me I must. We have already lived through many of these outbreaks in the past. I will not bow to a fear mongering Media. Life will go on just has it always has for centuries moos, before the Media and Politician's controlled everything. I am 60 years old and moos ,statistically I should only live another 16 years. I will be damned if I am going to live the remainder of my life in fear.

China should have manned up to the world and showed the world the leader it wants to be and stopped this shit in it's tracks, instead their hatred for all things democratic, and then their world domination goals allowed them to feel that this could used a tool (Biological Weapon) and they let it spread all over the free world with the help of bought and paid off World Health Organization. Ask Hong Kong how they feel about Beijing thee days ?

BTW I wonder how Putin's Russia feels about China these days ?

[Thestarider]

18 minutes ago, Thestarider said:

Number of deaths for leading causes of death:

• Heart disease: 647,457
• Cancer: 599,108
• Accidents (unintentional injuries): 169,936
• Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 160,201
• Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 146,383
• Alzheimer’s disease: 121,404
• Diabetes: 83,564
• Influenza and Pneumonia: 55,672
• Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome and nephrosis: 50,633
• Intentional self-harm (suicide): 47,173
• Life must go on and as much as we think we should live forever we do not.

I too played a round of golf this morning with my sons.