Jump to content

Dana & Chris Part #2


Recommended Posts

On ‎10‎/‎27‎/‎2018 at 9:58 PM, jjkopite said:

Still all there as of now!

I had a chance to watch the video. How anyone can be ok with that is simply beyond me. The guest girl clearly asks if the cams and on and Dana says that she doesn't think they are, but she then clearly states that the cams on not transmitting video. That was a bold faced lie! 

This clearly means that the guest did not review or sign any form of consent form prior to entering the apt. 

If I were VHTV I would pull the apt off air. I would demand to see the consent forms for every guest who has stepped foot in the apt. Particularly the ones who were nude and performed any sex act on cam. I would delete any videos where there is no consent. Then, I would contact each guest and confirm if they were aware that they were being video streamed and recorded. They have a right per EU privacy practices to be informed of this breech. Then, if any of them were illegally recorded I would beg for their forgiveness and pray that they don't file a complaint with the EU. 

I'm very disappointed with Dana'a behavior as well as VHTV's nonchalant attitude toward people being deceived into believing that the cams are not functional. I am also very displeased to know that so many of you see no problem with this. This is unacceptable and very disturbing. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Amy3 said:

The guest girl clearly asks if the cams and on and Dana says that she doesn't think they are, but she then clearly states that the cams on not transmitting video. That was a bold faced lie! 

I don't have access to the video, but based on your transcript of it,
when Dana says she doesn't think the cams are on, I agree, that's
a lie. However, she then corrects that lie by stating that the cams
are on.

Then she says the cams are not transmitting video. Technically,
that is the truth. These cams don't transmit video. They simply
transmit a signal of the image their lens sees. It's the viewers
who create the videos.

You might say that's splitting hairs, but in a court of law, that
distinction could be the difference between winning and losing
a case. Just something to think about.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, dirtdirt said:

So let me get this straight you knowingly are publishing photos of the girl in question who was lied to on a public forum which is illegal in all countries.  Someone call the police.  See I can shit in the punch bowl as well.

I hate it when someone shits! in the punch bowl

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, jabbath1987 said:

I do not care about any fines. It was illegal what they did and that's it. You are free to report other places too.

Hi jabbath, we all know you did the right thing. Shes dumb as a box of rocks for believing it though. Who knows this might have been the authorities trying to bust VH and the whole operation could be shut down. 

  • Like 5
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jabbath1987 said:

 VH as company is based in EU. And they must keep to this laws. 

and It does. It was Dana who lies  about the cams, not vhtv: or I missed something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, waldi said:

and It does. It was Dana who lies  about the cams, not vhtv: or I missed something?

How do you know it was a deliberate lie?  That's the thing I don't understand. How do you know it was not something prearranged? A prearranged discussion they did agree upon before they entered the apartment for the benefit of the cams?

I mean...everything is still available to watch... Dont you think VH would have deleted it by now if it was anything illegal that transpired?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, purplewrap said:

How do you know it was a deliberate lie?  That's the thing I don't understand. How do you know it was not something prearranged? A prearranged discussion they did agree upon before they entered the apartment for the benefit of the cams?

I mean...everything is still available to watch... Dont you think VH would have deleted it by now if it was anything illegal that transpired?

we're on the same side of barricade; all that is a complete nonsense and another quarrel about nothing because one of smart cc heroes decided to repair the world again and send so called ticket about suspicion of committing a crime. This forum really starts to be comical and people worth of pity. Maybe Vhtv should reconsider its involvement in here.

  • Like 3
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, jabbath1987 said:

Dear XXX,

Hello XXX,

Thank you very much. This is really forbidden by our rules. Stay cool. We solve the problem ASAP.

Regards,
Voyeur House TV.

You did the right thing. I’m really surprised that so many people seem to be okay with lying to guests about the cameras so that they can continue to watch for their own personal benefit.  It is in fact illegal, and I think most of us would be upset to be broadcast naked and having sex for the world to see if we didn’t give our permission.  What if your children or future children happened to come across it one day? Or worse yet, what if that happened to your child?  I heard a report not too long ago about a young woman who committed suicide because a video of her  doing something sexual was circulated without her permission and then she was bullied and made fun of afterwards and she couldn’t take it anymore. Dana and Chris can easily be replaced...doesn’t matter if the girl smiled at the camera or is too stupid to figure out why cameras are pointed to the bed. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, At7 said:

You did the right thing. I’m really surprised that so many people seem to be okay with lying to guests about the cameras so that they can continue to watch for their own personal benefit.  It is in fact illegal, and I think most of us would be upset to be broadcast naked and having sex for the world to see if we didn’t give our permission.  What if your children or future children happened to come across it one day? Or worse yet, what if that happened to your child?  I heard a report not too long ago about a young woman who committed suicide because a video of her  doing something sexual was circulated without her permission and then she was bullied and made fun of afterwards and she couldn’t take it anymore. Dana and Chris can easily be replaced...doesn’t matter if the girl smiled at the camera or is too stupid to figure out why cameras are pointed to the bed. 

The only thing that Jab did was to earn small gift $500 for VH bosses.

Dana - no more invite girls - who speak English. And she most likely will no longer speak English in cam. Everything else will be at same - as in all other apartments VH.

Again birthday VH soon. For birthday give gifts. Valerie and Glen - I think there is no need to know English to understand that guests heard fairy tale.😏 And if they spoke English, it would be 2 fines (drugs and lie). Why only Dana? If you are for justice - let's earn more money for VH bosses.

 

Problem is not solved. If you want to solve problem? Easy - demand transparency. For example - as they do in Porn or Webcam.

Not that tweets.

But that about new guests.

646.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...