thereala78 Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 11 minutes ago, thereala78 said: Really disappointed to ready you 😞 Neyt already talked a lot face to face to Kaya 😉 some discussions were even transcripted here 😉 You were there in the car, as all we were of course and you heard and understood exactly what was said... There is no doubt, Neyt, and Neyt only, deliberately said awful things about Kaya for no reason? She was not the only girl in the car, she was Kaya's friend, unlike other girl(s) there... why would she be the only bad girl to blame? I don't know what was said, again, but maybe things were said about Kaya in front of the ex-BF or even at his request... girls should have lied and don't say the truth (or what they think to be the truth)? Maybe the guy was questionning about Kaya behavior in the project and they just answered... again IDK... but no one knows except the occupants of the car... But what I find harsh is your eagerness to condemn Neyt as if she was solely responsible for this mess... just because the forum decided she's guilty... I think everyone is partly responsible, including Kaya; we don't know the whole history. How do you know guys and girls yesterday are really good firends? Maybe she just met them last week you don't know... Oh actually I know why Neyt has to be responsible... because she is THE BOSS and the boss is always responsible 😁
Alladino Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 5 minutes ago, Brit Guy said: @Alladino You said 'don't go into an apartment full of cameras that broadcast live on the internet.' As I said ...participants have total freedom to do as they wish and it's evident that RLC does NOT ask them to do anything they don't wish to do and therefore is not a 'requirement' of the project despite your point about cameras being trained on all the beds (which may I add I have said this same thing before but this means very little). The question I would ask is why are all the 'couples' toilets hidden yet 'some' of the Barce apartments toilets are in full view with active mics ...surely this is incredibly invasive and yet people cry when participants don't bate or fuck on cam and have a bath in a bikini ...so what ...deal with that shit. Like you said we pay RLC and not the project members because we literally pay to watch the apartments whilst they are online and nobody has any power on the content created/provided in each apartment and if anyone doesn't like it ...sign out and do one ...simple really. What I am describing are quite easy to understand concepts, and I am truly surprised at how superficially you are trying to refute them. At least think a bit about what you're writing here: " because we literally pay to watch the apartments whilst they are online". You can't be so incredibly naive as to believe that just because "pay RLC ... to watch the apartments" it's technically correct, it even begins to explain why people spend money on RLC. If that's enough for you, I'll gladly put a camera in a corner of my basement that I don't need right now, and you can pay to stare at the wall 24/7. No, the world isn't that simple, and if you really want to make a point here, it doesn't help to simply ignore essential aspects of the problem. 15 minutes ago, Mauri said: What you don't understand is that “private life” does not explicitly or necessarily mean “sex.” The girls signed a contract to live in an apartment with cameras, and they have to do exactly what they normally do in a home. Private life means many things, not sexual relations. Sexual activity is part of private life and i think, it is reasonable to expect that this is not be hidden from the camera. Anyway, We don't know what's in the contracts, and to be honest, I don't really care. My point is simply that I find it disappointing when a girl hides her sex life from the camera. I expect exactly the opposite from RLC. The fact that it can work is evident from all the residents who are genuinely involved in the project. So I think RLC should be stricter and kick freeloaders out of the project and find girls who are really comfortable in front of the cameras. 1 1
Maxbell Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago While we were watching other scenes, this happened, 4
desinc Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago It seems a lot of people here lay a lot of blame on Ney whom supposedly told Kaya's ex... "her one true love" that she was bringing guys to the villa to create content for us the viewers. (some here would applaud this effort) Nobody here knows exactly what was said because we're getting third hand information and, can't we all agree at this point, Kaya does have a propensity to over react? She certainly uses artistic license and has a certain flair regarding the truth when it's to her benefit. Here's a possible scenario... So Ney is in the car with this guy and maybe she's teasing him that he must be extra tired after sleeping (fucking) Kaya all night. Maybe he explains to Ney that he and Kaya aren't comfortable with having sex on camera so nothing actually happened. Then Ney might have said... that's weird... Kaya's had no issue with the cameras with other guys. Should Ney of minded her own business? I'm sure by now she wishes she had. One seemingly innocent chat starts WW3?... I don't think Ney was looking to cause any major drama. It's not like she lied about anything. Do you think Kaya had to lie to her ex to get him to come back for her B-day party? (I promise I haven't been with any guys here on cam! Ney's just a jealous liar!) Does anyone really believe this "ex" boyfriend is Kaya's "one true love" and how many other ones does she have? Does Kaya have an axe to grind or an ulterior motive because Ney slept with her friend the previous evening? I don't know what really was said but I seriously doubt Ney was trying to sabotage Kaya's relationship with her ex. 2 3
Sulzer Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Alladino said: What I am describing are quite easy to understand concepts, and I am truly surprised at how superficially you are trying to refute them. At least think a bit about what you're writing here: " because we literally pay to watch the apartments whilst they are online". You can't be so incredibly naive as to believe that just because "pay RLC ... to watch the apartments" it's technically correct, it even begins to explain why people spend money on RLC. If that's enough for you, I'll gladly put a camera in a corner of my basement that I don't need right now, and you can pay to stare at the wall 24/7. No, the world isn't that simple, and if you really want to make a point here, it doesn't help to simply ignore essential aspects of the problem. Sexual activity is part of private life and i think, it is reasonable to expect that this is not be hidden from the camera. Anyway, We don't know what's in the contracts, and to be honest, I don't really care. My point is simply that I find it disappointing when a girl hides her sex life from the camera. I expect exactly the opposite from RLC. The fact that it can work is evident from all the residents who are genuinely involved in the project. So I think RLC should be stricter and kick freeloaders out of the project and find girls who are really comfortable in front of the cameras. The only thing that annoys me when it happens is the fact it was made obvious that it was deliberate hiding the act, we don't know if the guy had previosly said to Kaya he is not doing anything in view of cams, but spontaniously Kaya knew there was somewhere to go hide so she took him down there. If they want to do it outside the Vila's then that is up to them its nothing to do with us and i don't really care. But when its deliberate when they should be on cam its wrong. I am still willing to give Kaya the benefit of doubt as she doesn't seem to bothered by cams at all. I mean she almost got there the other time but for the lack of condoms from No Condom guy.
Mauri Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 17 minuti fa, Alladino ha detto: Quello che sto descrivendo sono concetti abbastanza facili da capire, e sono davvero sorpreso di quanto superficialmente tu stia cercando di confutarli. Almeno pensa un po' a quello che stai scrivendo qui: "perché paghiamo letteralmente per guardare gli appartamenti mentre sono online". Non puoi essere così incredibilmente ingenuo da credere che solo perché "paga RLC ... per guardare gli appartamenti" sia tecnicamente corretto, inizia persino a spiegare perché le persone spendono soldi su RLC. Se questo è abbastanza per te, metterò volentieri una telecamera in un angolo del mio seminterrato che non mi serve in questo momento, e puoi pagare per fissare il muro 24 ore su 24, 7 giorni su 7. No, il mondo non è così semplice, e se vuoi davvero fare un punto qui, non aiuta semplicemente ignorare gli aspetti essenziali del problema. L'attività sessuale fa parte della vita privata e penso che sia ragionevole aspettarsi che questo non sia nascosto alla telecamera. Comunque, non sappiamo cosa c'è nei contratti e, ad essere onesti, non mi interessa davvero. Il mio punto è semplicemente che trovo deludente quando una ragazza nasconde la sua vita sessuale dalla telecamera. Mi aspetto esattamente il contrario da RLC. Il fatto che possa funzionare è evidente da tutti i residenti che sono sinceramente coinvolti nel progetto. Quindi penso che RLC dovrebbe essere più severo e cacciare i freeloaders dal progetto e trovare ragazze che siano davvero a loro agio davanti alle telecamere. Il sesso fa’ parte della vita privata di chi lo fa’, a chi piece il sesso occasionale, non tutti nella vita fanno sesso quando vogliono o se lo vogliono. Il fatto che siano su RLC non vuol dire che debbano fare cose che non farebbero al di fuori di esso, ed essere chi non sono, solamente per far felice delle persone che quatdano da uno schermo, per questo esiste Chaturbate. Paghi direttamente la ragazza per fargli fare quello che vuoi. Qui non funziona cosi. 1
thereala78 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 20 minutes ago, desinc said: It seems a lot of people here lay a lot of blame on Ney whom supposedly told Kaya's ex... "her one true love" that she was bringing guys to the villa to create content for us the viewers. (some here would applaud this effort) Nobody here knows exactly what was said because we're getting third hand information and, can't we all agree at this point, Kaya does have a propensity to over react? She certainly uses artistic license and has a certain flair regarding the truth when it's to her benefit. Here's a possible scenario... So Ney is in the car with this guy and maybe she's teasing him that he must be extra tired after sleeping (fucking) Kaya all night. Maybe he explains to Ney that he and Kaya aren't comfortable with having sex on camera so nothing actually happened. Then Ney might have said... that's weird... Kaya's had no issue with the cameras with other guys. Should Ney of minded her own business? I'm sure by now she wishes she had. One seemingly innocent chat starts WW3?... I don't think Ney was looking to cause any major drama. It's not like she lied about anything. Do you think Kaya had to lie to her ex to get him to come back for her B-day party? (I promise I haven't been with any guys here on cam! Ney's just a jealous liar!) Does anyone really believe this "ex" boyfriend is Kaya's "one true love" and how many other ones does she have? Does Kaya have an axe to grind or an ulterior motive because Ney slept with her friend the previous evening? I don't know what really was said but I seriously doubt Ney was trying to sabotage Kaya's relationship with her ex. Thank you! 😍 At least one more person with a little common sense. Oh but again, Neyt was not the only one in the car... why always talking about her... I don't want to send the fault to someone else but why would it be only Neyt fault it something bad has been said... which is stil not proven 🤣 1 1
thereala78 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Online Neyt and Dom are talking in the kitchen... I think it will be interesting if we could hear! 😕 1
Brit Guy Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 55 minutes ago, Alladino said: What I am describing are quite easy to understand concepts, and I am truly surprised at how superficially you are trying to refute them. At least think a bit about what you're writing here: " because we literally pay to watch the apartments whilst they are online". You can't be so incredibly naive as to believe that just because "pay RLC ... to watch the apartments" it's technically correct, it even begins to explain why people spend money on RLC. If that's enough for you, I'll gladly put a camera in a corner of my basement that I don't need right now, and you can pay to stare at the wall 24/7. No, the world isn't that simple, and if you really want to make a point here, it doesn't help to simply ignore essential aspects of the problem. Sexual activity is part of private life and i think, it is reasonable to expect that this is not be hidden from the camera. Anyway, We don't know what's in the contracts, and to be honest, I don't really care. My point is simply that I find it disappointing when a girl hides her sex life from the camera. I expect exactly the opposite from RLC. The fact that it can work is evident from all the residents who are genuinely involved in the project. So I think RLC should be stricter and kick freeloaders out of the project and find girls who are really comfortable in front of the cameras. We are clearly on different pages of how we believe RLC operates and your opinion is not my opinion so you can be as 'truly surprised' as you want to be, but I disagree with your somewhat warped and brainwashed opinion in believing RLC is something that it is clearly NOT. You keep mentioning girls too, but RLC has couples which has males participating too ...another thing you have 'bind-sided and ignored'. There are plenty of other apartments to watch if a participant does not do what you 'the viewer' wants them to do ...because nobody controls them and AGAIN they are all FREE to do as they wish. I don't quite understand what you aren't understanding.
Maxbell Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 17 minutes ago, thereala78 said: Thank you! 😍 At least one more person with a little common sense. I don’t think you are alone. I posted my thoughts about 2 hours ago regarding Kaya’s side. I am giving Ney some slack because her story might be quite different. Until we know, I don’t want to dig my heals in and take an either side. 1
Sulzer Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 5 minutes ago, thereala78 said: Online Neyt and Dom are talking in the kitchen... I think it will be interesting if we could hear! 😕 Could hear most of it, its pretty much what we already know Dominga was wanting Ney's side of it i guess., He (The Ex) asked Ney and Aya about Kaya, what happened etc so then what was said was said. At the end Ney said she have no problems with others Nani etc but with her Yes. . Dominga suggesting Distance just keep distance..... 3
Brit Guy Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 29 minutes ago, Mauri said: You pay the girl directly to make her do what you want. Here it doesn't work like that. Very well said ...and people here don't seem to understand this, as well as the fact the participants are completely free in making the choices they make. Many seem to think once participants enter RLC as a project member they are legally bound to go nude and do EVERYTHING on cam. Like you said 'here it doesn't work like that'.
Recommended Posts