tsuigou

24 minutes ago, Ridgerunner said:

Show me in the U.S. Constitution where it says that the president is not allowed to make an appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court before an election. Obama made an appointment in 2016 and the Senate rejected the appointment. If the Democrats controlled the Senate they would reject Trump's appointment. Also, if the Democrats controlled both the presidency and the Senate they would do exactly what Trump and the Republicans are doing right now. The statement you made that Trump has said that he will not accept the results of the election is a lie. He said that he needs to see exactly what happens in the election before saying one way or the other.  If it is proven that there was fraud or that elections in some states are closely contested and recounts are needed, why would he want to concede until those issues are resolved?

I never said it wasn't allowed. I'm just pointing out how biased it is. And sure, I admit I got it wrong that he didn't literally say that he wouldn't accept the results. We'll see how things go though. He doesn't strike me as the type of person to concede power very easily. In the event that he does lose the election and there is no proved fraud or need for recounts, I hope he takes the L without complaints or underhanded tactics.

12 hours ago, Ridgerunner said:

The next debate should be really fair since the CSPAN moderator, Steve Scully,  worked as an intern for Joe Biden and was a staff member for Democrat Sen. Ted Kennedy.  LMAO 

Kind of like Trump nominating Barrett to fill an empty seat on the Supreme Court just before an election he could very well lose and has openly admitted to not accepting if lost. Totally unbiased.

In my opinion it doesn't matter who won or lost because people on either side won't be swayed regardless of what happened. Trump supporters will find excuses to keep supporting Trump and Biden supporters will keep pointing the finger at Trump's incompetence. Nothing changes.

On 9/7/2020 at 11:05 AM, pulo filipe said:

(Image Content No Longer Available)

Is there a video of this?

1 hour ago, keeper31 said:

Why are they permitted to stay?  RLC condones this behavior if they keep them.

Not just that. I don't care how verbally aggressive she gets, you don't lash out like this. He must also not be very smart because if she ever decides to press charges, the evidence is on the internet now.

I don't like where this is going... Kitty is one of my favorites. And with Martina, Leora and Nina/Kira no longer free, Kitty going away means I basically only have Anabel left. Which saddens me. But this isn't a healthy relationship and this can't be allowed to continue and/or escalate. Domestic violence is unacceptable, no matter the circumstances.

6 hours ago, xanadu said:

05 Janvier 2019

 

This actually has me worried... does anyone know what was going on?