anna2016

These politically correct arguments make RLC staff very happy and they should thank you. I know they follow the discussion and even vote LOL

I don't think so. 15 votes can't make a vote reliable and most of RLC users are not connected to the forum even if staff can and vote. Deny reality can't change reality and some porn industry studios has already understood things and some producers are now rejecting condom because of less popular videos. http://www.vocativ.com/365967/men-condoms-porn/index.html When it comes to heterosexual guys and watching vaginal sex, 65 percent preferred condomless (821 people voting) Is that clear ?

I don't think so, if RLC engages a couple and pay them 25%-50% more if not using condoms, you'll see all condoms disappear. Just magic... All condom addicts would not accept the rule.

Pregnancy is not a disease, it's just reallife.

The end of the story for RLC like sites is that they will continue to develop the condom overdose without paying attention to what their customer want to see or not see or can support. When I subscribe the first time to RLC : ZERO condom. Now a pollution. So I foresee in the next months customers not renewing their membership because condom overdose will increase with new couples who have been educated by brainwashing to only imagine sexual life with the God condom (poor people). In the same time the last condom free couples will leave In my case in the next week I 'll quit definitively because I didn't subscribe to a giant condom showroom that has become a nightmare to watch when on cameras.

To all defenders of condoms, have forgot than pills and other contraception means exist ? I suggest you to set up a rescue operation to save others couples (Leora no condom for 4 years and still not pregnant - Nancy more than 2 years still not pregnant, masha...). their life is in danger. And if they get pregnant what's the problem, they leave. In this debate I notice there is bad faith and hypocrisy to avoid debate and always defend condom usage while ignoring others couples who can manage their life without this stupid and ugly piece of rubber.

@Daley It's not an argument. Bla Bla to promote condom addicts. With too many people hoping to be selected by RLC what's the problem to select people accepting to quit when getting pregnant and be replaced. RLC is not made for life.

Fed up with condoms spreading in RLC apartments and scenes. If you also hate condom pollution in the new apartments please vote to retrieve the original RLC available at the beginning without any condom.

Perfect and without the condom disease which is invading all new apartments and are about to decide me to leave RLC because I boycott all condom apartments. Ugh ! If all RLC members could boycott the same way, all these rubber and plastic would disappear. I don't care about moralistic and fake arguments about the ultimate necessity of rubber and plastic.

if side effects..., may be rlc is not made for them. Although disapproving and moralistic statements, I maintain sex with condom is not sex. 6 condom free apartments is still enough for me to stay

Not naive see couples strip-teasing and adopt sex positions and angles to offer the best sex scene in front of cameras. It's not just make their life.

These young couples are paid by RLC to make sex in front of cameras and know they are viewed by thousands of people. Pornstars are paid the same way to do sex and be viewed. Nelly, Leora and others, it's something different. They give the image of real couples and are exhibitionist, let us sometimes forget they are paid for the job.

LOL you react this way and pretend not notice evidence.

Everything is about context. Pornstars vs real couples. I choose to only watch real couples on RLC and I don't want RLC to become a boring amateur pornstars hub.

Safety sex for people doing creampie and just after using condoms ? I pay RLC for watching real people not pornstars. Nelly, Leora, Masha, Anabel and others.. are real couples and don't need to use plastic or rubber to live in security.