hopscotch24

Lina Livingroom

10/04/18 21:00

Thanks

Bree Bedroom 10/04/18

Approx 22:00

Thanks

Lina

Livingroom

April 7 - 13:33 - 14:01

Thanks.

2 minutes ago, waldi said:

pure voyeur site like for instant peepholecam which still offers hidden cams, ( something for hardcore voyeurs ) is dying. I read on their forum, that Kevin thinks about business similar to vhtv because current model isn't able to attract customers. This kind of businesses is like any others, to exist, must develop and change, simply because audience gets bored very quickly. I don't want to say it has to go towards so called "live porn", but so far it seems to be right direction and it works.

Yep that site has changed too sadly. Some of the cams on RLC do feel voyeuristic, that is a bit of a mixed bag, but way too expensive for replay.

Oh well, all it means is that there is a gap in the market, someone will find a way to fill it eventually I'm sure. :)

31 minutes ago, golfer06 said:

these sites probably did start out as voyeur in a truer sense. but once the site management found that more money could be made with more sex they went in that direction. as for myself i found the sites while looking for porn. if it was just everyday life with sex & nudity once in a gr8 while i would watch it for a little while & if nothing happened i'd go on to something else. my comment was that the sites are not going to revert to less sex & nudity anytime soon as they are making $ with what they are doing now. so if anyone wants to get the old "real life voyeur" experience they will probably have to look elsewhere.

You're right, and nobody is saying they should have less sex, plenty of people have lots of sex. I think it's more about the performance nature of it, and the deliberate permanent nudity, it stops seeming like real life. You also have to consider that yes lot's of people who just want to see porn like this will sign up, but there are a lot of fans of voyeurism who don't sign up and they would if it felt more like that. A true voyeur feeling website would make lot's of $$$ too, especially when you consider that nobody is truly catering for that. I think it's the fault of people who don't particularly care about voyeurism, they come to the website and complain that there isn't enough porn going on, so the website owners feel pressure to "make stuff happen", but then you lose the voyeurism completely.

I love VHTV there is lot's which is good to see, but I still am here hoping for a website with the amount of content and participants and quality of service and is also really voyeuristic. At least VHTV has shown the way in terms of how to provide the service with so many cams, replay and moments. Hopefully one day someone will take this same model and apply it to something which really feels voyeuristic too, there are lots of us who would love to see that happen.

On 4/2/2018 at 12:08 PM, golfer06 said:

i'm curious about something. why after finding out that sex has become the main activity in most of the apts do some still expect a "real voyeur site"? look someplace else. the vast majority want to see sex.

I don't think people mind sex, it's just not very voyeuristic when it is a "porno" performance for the cameras. Voyeurism is about seeing what you are not supposed to see, when things are done with the cameras and audience in mind it loses it's exciting voyeuristic feeling and becomes like ordinary porno. VH is still great, but it often doesn't feel very voyeuristic, and that's Ok but the website does have "voyeur" in the name, sometimes I wish it wasn't so obvious that the participants are doing things for the cameras and deliberately being naked all the time, it feels like I am watching their sex job instead of their real authentic sex lives.

It's a difficult balance though, I am sure that if it was exactly as I would like it to be, then others would complain that it's boring or something. But I think the voyeur audience largely doesn't join sites like this for these reasons. I still enjoy it though, not complaining.

Just now, golfer06 said:

no interest on my part but enjoy. there is an earlier 1 saved also.

Great, thanks! Please be sure that masturbation under the covers is enjoyed by some and worth keeping!

1 minute ago, golfer06 said:

@hopscotch24done. but why is misty undercover of any interest?

masturbation under the covers is still very hot, at least I think so.

Ary & George

Livingroom 18:54 - 19:10

Misty

Bedroom 18:25 - 19:14

Thanks.

Bree & Drew

Livingroom, Apr 3 22:52 - 23:10

Thanks.

58 minutes ago, Amy3 said:

 Neither is knowing about cameras all over ones house. Pretty much ends the voyeurism right there. This is pure entertainment and we all, including them, know it.

I guess I am talking about the difference between something being "candid" vs something being a performance.

16 hours ago, Hunter D. said:

Maybe it's just me...but it seems a lack of imagination over there. Of what i've seen, i think that most of the participants are fucking in the same way every time. I wanted to  see some spice over there like erotic games, roleplays, kinky stuff etc not the booring recipee: blowjob, dick jerking, pussy licking, fucking missionary, doggystyle, blowjob...

Fair enough, doesn't sound very voyeuristic though.

7 minutes ago, wathou said:

It's for premium users of camcaps => https://camcaps.net/store/

Ah, Ok. Thanks for the reply.

On 07/02/2017 at 3:28 PM, xfirehost said:

Natasha masturbate

 

Natasha Masturbating 2017-02-05.mp4

Is this still available somewhere? It says i can't access that page?

Thanks