hopscotch24

Lina Livingroom 10/04/18 21:00 Thanks

Bree Bedroom 10/04/18 Approx 22:00 Thanks

Lina Livingroom April 7 - 13:33 - 14:01 Thanks.

Yep that site has changed too sadly. Some of the cams on RLC do feel voyeuristic, that is a bit of a mixed bag, but way too expensive for replay. Oh well, all it means is that there is a gap in the market, someone will find a way to fill it eventually I'm sure. :)

You're right, and nobody is saying they should have less sex, plenty of people have lots of sex. I think it's more about the performance nature of it, and the deliberate permanent nudity, it stops seeming like real life. You also have to consider that yes lot's of people who just want to see porn like this will sign up, but there are a lot of fans of voyeurism who don't sign up and they would if it felt more like that. A true voyeur feeling website would make lot's of $$$ too, especially when you consider that nobody is truly catering for that. I think it's the fault of people who don't particularly care about voyeurism, they come to the website and complain that there isn't enough porn going on, so the website owners feel pressure to "make stuff happen", but then you lose the voyeurism completely. I love VHTV there is lot's which is good to see, but I still am here hoping for a website with the amount of content and participants and quality of service and is also really voyeuristic. At least VHTV has shown the way in terms of how to provide the service with so many cams, replay and moments. Hopefully one day someone will take this same model and apply it to something which really feels voyeuristic too, there are lots of us who would love to see that happen.

I don't think people mind sex, it's just not very voyeuristic when it is a "porno" performance for the cameras. Voyeurism is about seeing what you are not supposed to see, when things are done with the cameras and audience in mind it loses it's exciting voyeuristic feeling and becomes like ordinary porno. VH is still great, but it often doesn't feel very voyeuristic, and that's Ok but the website does have "voyeur" in the name, sometimes I wish it wasn't so obvious that the participants are doing things for the cameras and deliberately being naked all the time, it feels like I am watching their sex job instead of their real authentic sex lives. It's a difficult balance though, I am sure that if it was exactly as I would like it to be, then others would complain that it's boring or something. But I think the voyeur audience largely doesn't join sites like this for these reasons. I still enjoy it though, not complaining.

Great, thanks! Please be sure that masturbation under the covers is enjoyed by some and worth keeping!

masturbation under the covers is still very hot, at least I think so.

Ary & George Livingroom 18:54 - 19:10 Misty Bedroom 18:25 - 19:14 Thanks.

Bree & Drew Livingroom, Apr 3 22:52 - 23:10 Thanks.

I guess I am talking about the difference between something being "candid" vs something being a performance.

Fair enough, doesn't sound very voyeuristic though.

Ah, Ok. Thanks for the reply.

Is this still available somewhere? It says i can't access that page? Thanks