Alladino

Yes, of course, new attractive residents are a clear sign of the decline of RLC. 🤣 Even though the two of them make a super sympathetic first impression, you are full of hate.

Very few residents clean up after themselves shortly before moving out. Also, There were no signs of them packing their bags. I think they have visitors they do not want us to see. This has happened sometimes in the past. But I'm not sure. Ultimately, it could also be a genuine malfunction, but somehow I think that's the least likely possibility.

When I saw that Medusa became part of the project, I thought, especially since she was quite fun to watch in Masha apartment, that it could develop positively. But together with Numi, it's the worst possible outcome. A bunch of lifeless bullshit shows. Really pathetic. It's as if all real life has been erased and substituted for boredom. 😒

I think it would be important for B5 to have a new couple moving in soon. Somehow the air is out there at the moment.

Where did I say that I'm only interested in sex? Where does the idea that everything must somehow be exclusive come from? Of course, for me, RLC is not just about watching sex. But it would lose its value for me as a voyeur if there was no sex to see. It's about looking into other people's private lives, which also includes sex. Not just the sex, not just everything without sex.

I've known RLC for some time now, and all that time there was sex to be seen. Maybe not as much as today, but not at all. Ultimately, without sex, RLC would be finished.

Please, Read through the definition of porn at least once, before you write something like that. High image quality is not a condition for pornography. The fact that some residents don't really participate in the project doesn't make the value that the other residents provide any less. RLC is porn, but, in giving a view into the private life (of most or at least part of the residents), also more than that.

I think, nobody here doubts that RLC provides an insight into the private lives of most (or at least some) of the residents. But that in no way excludes the fact that RLC is ultimately to be regarded as pornographic. The two are not mutually exclusive. Also, the fact that residents decide when and how to have sex does not mean that it is not pornographic. Again, The two are not mutually exclusive. The point is that RLC wouldn't exist without the paying viewers, and for them the sexual action to be seen is the main argument for paying so much money. I don't know why this is so hard for you to accept, but without sex, there would be no RLC. The rest of your comment is just presumptuous. At least I have no problem with being a voyeur. On RLC there is a place where I can live this out without coming into conflict with the law. I see no issue with that.

Look at the whole thing from another direction. Most of the popular scenes on RLC are about sex (or at least explicit nudity). That's no coincidence. This kind of content, is not an extra, it's why people are willing to pay. Of course you can say that none of the residents have to do anything, and I agree with. But, at the same time, it should be clear to you that none of RLC's customers can be forced to continue paying. If there is nothing more to see, then people simply stop being interested and spend their money elsewhere. One problem I have with the do nothing girls is that they live like parasites off the people who are actually involved in the project. In addition, it's disappointing when some of the girls who are there for months do absolutely nothing (not even masturbating). The impression is not one of getting a glimpse into private life, but the certainty that the private life is deliberately kept away from the camera. That makes no sense, and therefore I think RLC is well advised to get rid of do nothing girls as soon as possible. Not a must, but a should.

As long as no one here discloses one of the contracts between RLC and the girls, I would be careful with any definitive statements about what the girls have or have not contractually agreed to. My statement therefore does not refer to a must, but a should. Ultimately, anyone who moves into a house where there are at least three cameras in every bedroom streaming to a website with the motto: "The private life of other people" should know what the should be prepared to do, if they join the project. It's not that it has to be all about sex all the time, but it's also not about no sex at all. As I said, the point here is that I consider do nothing girls to be the failure of RLC. RLC promises an insight into private life and should ensure that the right people are in the cast.

I don't see it that way. The residents should be prepared to live out also their sexual life in front of the camera. This is not an bonus, but an essential part of the RLC. The point is that do nothing girls should simply not live in these apartments at all. Just like I think that girls where sex doesn't look real (but more like in a porn movie) don't fit in with RLC. The point is to get an insight into the private lives of the residents. Exaggerations or the omission of sex simply don't fit in.

In my experience, after a week it is quite easy to tell where the journey is going. Not completely, but do nothing girls can be recognized quite quickly. The problem starts when do nothing girls still want to make money and put on shows without really being willing to actually participate in the project. Then it happens that the grown up women behave as if they were still virgins. Another thing, it always annoys me when people badmouth the guys here. What happens, or doesn't happen, is very clearly up to the girls. Wolf was no exception to this. It's a strange situation in which some of the girls want to put on a show, pretending to want something but not actually wanting it. This is already difficult for many people here in the forum to recognize and is certainly even more difficult to think through logically as a man who thinks he is about to take action. Ultimately, it is the problem of do nothing girls in a project that is actually about something happening on camera.

I think anyone who participates as a resident on a site like RLC shouldn't be afraid of the camera.

These show parties, where all the girls walk around half naked but nothing happens, aren't really a hit either. Unless something turns around in B5, which I really don't think it will, then RLC will probably be be a zero game today.

It's strange what combinations sometimes appear on RLC. It's so obvious that she's not ready to really do anything in front of the camera and so this whole shit show ends up being some kind of teenage like pedding disaster. It always amazes me why RLC keeps bringing girls who so obviously don't fit into the project.