Alladino

2 minutes ago, TfiDeano said:

Masha losing her shit with Shaquille or arguing with him over something lmfao. 

Lately, Masha really has a tendency to clash with anyone who dares to come into the apartment. I don't know what's going on this time, but she should start working on her problem-solving attitude. These constant outbursts of anger are useless most of the time.

21 minutes ago, maxfactor said:

More bodies to fill a bed.  RLC is fucked

Yes, of course, new attractive residents are a clear sign of the decline of RLC. 🤣 

Even though the two of them make a super sympathetic first impression, you are full of hate.

5 hours ago, itohkata said:

Maybe they are leaving and the party they had recently was a farewell party.

Very few residents clean up after themselves shortly before moving out. Also, There were no signs of them packing their bags. 

I think they have visitors they do not want us to see. This has happened sometimes in the past. But I'm not sure. Ultimately, it could also be a genuine malfunction, but somehow I think that's the least likely possibility.

When I saw that Medusa became part of the project, I thought, especially since she was quite fun to watch in Masha apartment, that it could develop positively. But together with Numi, it's the worst possible outcome. A bunch of lifeless bullshit shows. Really pathetic.

It's as if all real life has been erased and substituted for boredom. 😒

4 hours ago, TfiDeano said:

Wonder if a new couple is moving in. Mati vacuumed and made the bed before UM happened.

I think it would be important for B5 to have a new couple moving in soon. Somehow the air is out there at the moment.

2 minutes ago, Melle2 said:

I agree: without sex, RLC would be at an end, but a voyeur is also interested in other things.

If you're only interested in sex, there are better sites.

Where did I say that I'm only interested in sex? Where does the idea that everything must somehow be exclusive come from?

Of course, for me, RLC is not just about watching sex. But it would lose its value for me as a voyeur if there was no sex to see. It's about looking into other people's private lives, which also includes sex. Not just the sex, not just everything without sex.

Just now, Mauri said:

RLC went on for years and there wasn't as much sex

I've known RLC for some time now, and all that time there was sex to be seen. Maybe not as much as today, but not at all. Ultimately, without sex, RLC would be finished.

5 minutes ago, Melle2 said:

I recommend refraining from insults, otherwise we'll be back to hatred.

RLC is not a porn site, the sex is too bad and the camera settings are bad too, but it is also not a site for voyeurs, as the behavior of the tenants prevents this.

Please, Read through the definition of porn at least once, before you write something like that.  High image quality is not a condition for pornography. The fact that some residents don't really participate in the project doesn't make the value that the other residents provide any less.

RLC is porn, but, in giving a view into the private life (of most  or at least part of the residents), also more than that. 

10 minutes ago, TfiDeano said:

Sex scenes of any sort will always win and be top cams...it's natural to be a voyeur and watch which is exactly what this site is for...to watch the private lives of real people with whatever they are doing. RLC caters for me as I am a people watcher and it's a bonus if and when I get to see them have sex which in fairness is a private event for most people and these tenants have the freedom to have sex or not have sex, it doesn't stop me from scribing. Someone said I'm the odd one out to believe this is not a porn site lol. What's odd is these people PAY to watch someone else have sex instead of getting their own woman to fuck...laughable. RLC is voyeur...simple as...in my opinion anyway.

I think, nobody here doubts that RLC provides an insight into the private lives of most (or at least some) of the residents. But that in no way excludes the fact that RLC is ultimately to be regarded as pornographic. The two are not mutually exclusive. Also, the fact that residents decide when and how to have sex does not mean that it is not pornographic. Again, The two are not mutually exclusive.

The point is that RLC wouldn't exist without the paying viewers, and for them the sexual action to be seen is the main argument for paying so much money. I don't know why this is so hard for you to accept, but without sex, there would be no RLC.

The rest of your comment is just presumptuous. At least I have no problem with being a voyeur. On RLC there is a place where I can live this out without coming into conflict with the law. I see no issue with that.

1 hour ago, TfiDeano said:

You clearly misread my comment and missed out the vital parts, so I will say this again like I have said in the past. As a subscriber you are entitled to one thing, and one thing only...visual access to the apartments via recording equipment. The participants are not sheep nor are they other animals on display for your sexual gratification, and they DO NOT have to have sex on cam just because you pay $45 each month. They allow us as viewers to watch them do whatever they do or don't do in their homes whilst being part of the project. What's even more real with the project is if people on cam want to have sex under covers then they can, which makes it 'real life' and all the more real, unlike a porn site. I am happy to disagree with what you said as you are with my opinion.   

Look at the whole thing from another direction. Most of the popular scenes on RLC are about sex (or at least explicit nudity). That's no coincidence. This kind of content, is not an extra, it's why people are willing to pay. Of course you can say that none of the residents have to do anything, and I agree with. But, at the same time, it should be clear to you that none of RLC's  customers can be forced to continue paying. If there is nothing more to see, then people simply stop being interested and spend their money elsewhere.

One problem I have with the do nothing girls is that they live like parasites off the people who are actually involved in the project. In addition, it's disappointing when some of the girls who are there for months do absolutely nothing (not even masturbating). The impression is not one of getting a glimpse into private life, but the certainty that the private life is deliberately kept away from the camera. That makes no sense, and therefore I think RLC is well advised to get rid of do nothing girls as soon as possible. Not a must, but a should.

49 minutes ago, TfiDeano said:

@Alladino 

I don't see it that way. The residents should be prepared to live out also their sexual life in front of the camera. This is not an bonus, but an essential part of the RLC.

The point is that do nothing girls should simply not live in these apartments at all.  Just like I think that girls where sex doesn't look real (but more like in a porn movie) don't fit in with RLC. The point is to get an insight into the private lives of the residents. Exaggerations or the omission of sex simply don't fit in.

Let's agree to disagree, there is strictly no rule that states they must have sex on cam and as I said we are not entitled as viewers to watch and lust just over sexual activity within the project...it is merely a bonus when catching someone on cam having sex in full view of people viewing the website. Yes all the beds have camera's trained on them, but unlike a porn site RLC tenants have freedom to do as they please and viewers have the freedom and choice of switching cams if she do not like what they are or are not seeing.  

As long as no one here discloses one of the contracts between RLC and the girls, I would be careful with any definitive statements about what the girls have or have not contractually agreed to. My statement therefore does not refer to a must, but a should. Ultimately, anyone who moves into a house where there are at least three cameras in every bedroom streaming to a website with the motto: "The private life of other people" should know what the should be prepared to do, if they join the project. It's not that it has to be all about sex all the time, but it's also not about no sex at all. As I said, the point here is that I consider do nothing girls to be the failure of RLC. RLC promises an insight into private life and should ensure that the right people are in the cast.

7 minutes ago, TfiDeano said:

I've always said viewers are entitled to one thing and that is access to the apartments in camera form so anything sexual activity of any form is a bonus, it's a given and is not a requirement but rather a bonus as we are not in effect entitled to see any of them have participate in any form of sexual activity as the tenants are allowed to hide from the cams either to an off cam room or even under the covers. We should never expect anything more than the standard day to day living and again sexual stuff is merely a bonus rather than an entitlement.  

I don't see it that way. The residents should be prepared to live out also their sexual life in front of the camera. This is not an bonus, but an essential part of the RLC.

The point is that do nothing girls should simply not live in these apartments at all.  Just like I think that girls where sex doesn't look real (but more like in a porn movie) don't fit in with RLC. The point is to get an insight into the private lives of the residents. Exaggerations or the omission of sex simply don't fit in.

6 minutes ago, TfiDeano said:

I normally give newbies 2 weeks to see how they mature into the world of RLC but both Naya & Kat still seem to have a problem with certain things. Kat is opening up more but not quick enough and Hawk is just too nice to pursue anything faster. He's slower than Tantra to be honest. I suppose the good thing about Hawk being patient or too nice is he's not as in your face like Wolf and Masshole was/is respectively and isn't hated by anyone lol. 

In my experience, after a week it is quite easy to tell where the journey is going. Not completely, but do nothing girls can be recognized quite quickly. The problem starts when do nothing girls still want to make money and put on shows without really being willing to actually participate in the project. Then it happens that the grown up women behave as if they were still virgins.

Another thing, it always annoys me when people badmouth the guys here. What happens, or doesn't happen, is very clearly up to the girls. Wolf was no exception to this. It's a strange situation in which some of the girls want to put on a show, pretending to want something but not actually wanting it. This is already difficult for many people here in the forum to recognize and is certainly even more difficult to think through logically as a man who thinks he is about to take action. Ultimately, it is the problem of do nothing girls in a project that is actually about something happening on camera.

1 minute ago, TfiDeano said:

How do they not fit into the project?

I think anyone who participates as a resident on a site like RLC shouldn't be afraid of the camera.

30 minutes ago, corvette08 said:

Waste of time with that do nothing girl.

These show parties, where all the girls walk around half naked but nothing happens, aren't really a hit either. Unless something turns around in B5, which I really don't think it will, then RLC will probably be be a zero game today.

13 minutes ago, corvette08 said:

I'm not even watching and I know she won't let him fuck her. All she wants to do is give him a handjob.

It's strange what combinations sometimes appear on RLC.

It's so obvious that she's not ready to really do anything in front of the camera and so this whole shit show ends up being some kind of teenage like pedding disaster. It always amazes me why RLC keeps bringing girls who so obviously don't fit into the project. 

4 minutes ago, nagachilli2 said:

Hey Dino, how's it hanging?...I was getting worried. I've missed all the bold txt...😏

Occasionally I still post here. Just not as much as I used to.

Anyway, I am pleased to create an added value with my contributions. 😅 It is appropriate to format the text in bold, so that no one accidentally misses my wisdom. 🤣

25 minutes ago, thinga69 said:

Possible that will because there is where the shower is.

It seems that they will not last long.

I think we should at least wait until they are in the apartment with running cameras before we write them off.🤣 Everything is still possible.

Ultimately, what is needed is a combination of good looks, a sympathetic character and open-mindedness towards the cameras. 

1 minute ago, moules said:

She opened the suitcase.  Half full.  Either there is lost luggage, Masha will arrive with more clothes, or Roxy is at B-4 to fill an empty bed for a month or so.

Aren't there already a few items of clothing in the wardrobe?

10 minutes ago, StnCld316 said:

I was hoping RLC just go back to just girls in the apartment villas. They know how to find the men if they want satisfaction instead of having guys there thinking a girl is their free ticket for a fuck at their disposal.  

The concept with guys works far better than the version from before. Of course, that doesn't change the fact that in RLC there are unfortunately always 2-3 do nothing girls in the cast. But with the girls who actually participate, something happens much more often, now.

2 minutes ago, philo said:

When Wolf was ramming his fingers into Shantal, he could have easily fucked her but he didn't. I think that the same will happen with Madison.

It is the girls who determine how far it goes. If nothing happens, then you should be fair enough to blame the girls.

If Madison ever decides that she's ready to do something in front of the camera, it will happen, but as long as she only wants to do teasing only events, nothing will happen.

2 minutes ago, philo said:

Madison let Wolf lick her pussy so I don't know what is stopping this from proceeding to it's logical conclusion.

The most likely answer is that she simply doesn't want to have sex in front of the camera. That would be another do nothing girl in RLC, which wouldn't really come as a surprise.

It's also possible that it's just for show and they simply want to keep this teasing game going for as long as possible. That's probably the easiest way to be top cam without actually doing anything.

5 minutes ago, thinga69 said:

It seems that the cams in their room doesn't have a good angle to watch their uncovered asses and only one cam to have a clear view of the couch action.

Let's see how this unfolds.

Yes, I noticed that straight away too, there is clearly no good view of the couch. One can only hope that RLC will improve this.

Otherwise it's nice that the two are back, I had already thought they had left the project.

15 hours ago, Noldus said:

15. november 
Bye bye, there was a slight decline from St. P

That's a huge understatement. 

15 hours ago, StnCld316 said:

Samantha has left the RLC project.

Well, as expected, RLC has hit a new low with Samanta. So much for all the people here who were happy about Eva and BF moving out. 

Well, now the two oldies are together again until they realize that an RLC with only old residents doesn't really work well.

7 hours ago, StnCld316 said:

She did what she was supposed to do.  There is nothing on RLC's website that states they have to have sex with anyone or masturbate.

What you see is what you get.

What is RealLifeCam?

RealLifeCam is a unique website where you have the chance to observe the private life of other people in live mode round-the-clock.

 

Who are the people we see on the website and what is the scenario they are living?

People you see online are not actors, they are real people living their routine lives in apartments equipped with video cameras. There are no scenarios, no operators, video editing or censorship - just 24/7 life as it is.

Be honest, did you really got the impression that you were getting a glimpse into her private life (as it is)? I got the impression that she did her best to keep it away from the apartment. It's a problem when residents keep their private lives off camera and treat the apartment as a workplace. 

Besides, what's the point of paying money to see nothing for months except someone killing time? Honestly, this girl was one of the main reasons I quit my RLC sub. With so many do-nothings it is just not worth the money RLC wants to have.