*** New Software Coming Soon! Please Check for Important Information in the Read Me Section ***
-
Posts
4,637 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Points
-50 [ Donate ]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Blogs
Competitions
Everything posted by MrBox
-
My goodness why so negative? ... Finally there is a girl in this apartment that has a sexual drive and is is open enough to live it out. ... Truly outstanding. .... Add to that a really sympathetic charisma and a very nice character and you have Elisa. .... Very nice. ...
-
Good point. ... No good mood on my side. ... Sorry if I was to directly with my criticism. ... But basically I still think that I am right here. I can understand why you wrote this "analysis". ... I also would like to know more about the backgrounds of RLC. ... Unfortunately, we do not know something for real and I think, it is important to recognize that. ... No analysis is better than a false.
-
Nice analysis? ... ... it's just nonsense He confuses pageviews with subscriptions. There do not need to be a direct relationship of both. A reduction of visitors (due to a different policy of free content or different behavior towards copyright violations) must not impact the subscriptions at all. It might even be the opposite, because some former leecher might pay now. Good for him that he has at least thought about it briefly. Why did he use the numbers then anyway? ... They are based on estimates (estimated hits) and the assumption of advertising revenue. RLC is not financed through advertising. ... All they income assumptions are useless. Again. Just assumptions and much text without any proper information at all. ... Clear is only one. The whole page costs a lot of money. ... That is probably the reason why they can not give everything away for free. Again. The number is based on expected ads revenue that are based on the assumptions about the number of page visits. No meaningful information. Ultimately, he compares extremely weak assumptions with false values. That's not nice but stupid.
-
No. The ban seams to be reasonable and a refund ould be ridiculous. RLC also needs to earn his money. ... This is not posible, if they content are available for free on the internet. I had connection issue some time ago. ... I had a productive contact with support and got several days extension (more as the actual interruption) as compensation. ... Very nice customer friendliness.
-
This is perhaps somewhat exaggerated. We do not know the contract between RLC and K&K. Therefore, we maybe should stick to the evaluation of RLC and do not make the girls worse than they are. Although I am clearly disappointed with this apartment, I can not find anything negative about the girls. ... The residents should have a "Real life" and are not intended to entertain. RLC should have a good cast, that is important. ... The girls seams to be nice. ... They are probably hired for teasing.
-
Apartment Review and Discussion, Anezka & Karel
MrBox replied to alanohio's topic in Anezka & Karel (03/29/16 - 09/12/16)
I like most of the reviews you have created. … Unfortunately you missed my opinion for this couple greatly and also seams a bit to fast with your assessment. (*) The life has good and bad times for all people. For some it is a little harder to focus on the good side of life and they sometimes even fall a little. Although we have not seen much, to me it seams very beautiful and moving how both support each other to gain new strength. Thus, something that can be a seen as a bad sign can also contain something extreme positive. A truly wonderful couple. Referring to something that would be more important to most people in this forum, I like to say that they are very open, authentic and extremely skilled. I think, we should not interpret too much here, but as a response to your remark I like so say that nothing I've seen indicates a poor relationship and almost everything I have seen speaks for a positive one instead. Even with the exception of the lack of visitors, this is a really outstanding couple I am very happy to see on RLC. That they also have a cat and no dogs makes them almost perfect. … ;) … Very nice. (*) Do not worry, I did the same mistake as I thought they would start to hide. -
Maybe it is time for some reality: Without the bedroom cameras in the apartments of RLC the project would not survive, because the value of $45/month would be ridiculous. With this cameras, there is the reasoned presumption that this page is serious about the term "Real Life". Furthermore, RLC has show in the past that this presumtion is implemented throughout the apartments (at least until the move out of Nora). ... That this policy has changed, seems obvious (K&K, D&D, ...), but it will definitely disappoint many customers. ... Come one, $45/month to watch a couple go 2nd base just to run out off cameras and have sex on the balcony. You can not call this "REALLIFECAM" seriously. Since they return from their holidays, this apartment is somehow more artificial that before and extreme lonely. I can not see the "ordinary life of two young women in a russian city" there, because it take place outside of the apartment only. Just strage visits, almost no interaction, .... It is sad. BTW, All this does not mean that I do not appreciate K&K. They are two very nice and sympathetic girls and I wish them only good. But I think, RLC should have selected a different cast and also an different approach (e.g. They need to have both side of an couple in contract).
