hugewwefanatic

eww, yeah, not a fan of that either. Oh well lol. Let's see how she gets along with the others.

Yep...looks like it!!

(The Image Content is no longer accessible and has been removed).

Nope, I'm pretty new to RLC and this forum. To answer your question: As a viewer, you'd want it long, and a girl doing it just wants the orgasms, so she probably doesn't care either way.

Haha, oh my goodness.

This quote is funny in hindsight since she didn't last very long.

I'm aware, but thanks for pointing it out. In fact if you take a quick jump over there, it's been sorted out. Frank requested his thread be deleted.

:yeahbaby: Christmas came early......... and after seeing that I might do that too :haha:

She's a marvel. This woman, cooks, cleans, sews (possibly embroidery) , does the laundry, paints, sketches, masturbates, has sex, and looks good doing every bit of it. I'm sure you can tell who I am a fan of :D Then you have Paul. This guy looks at the laptop, picks his nose.......that is all. :D

We have a new member to the Girls House, Anna :welcome:

Damn, look at all the hot action!!!! :lmao: (The Image Content is No Longer Accessible and Has Been Removed)

A. Real Life: This one is the most boring because people just live their lives. They go to work, go shopping, visit friends and have them visit, watch TV, play video games, use the phone/computer/tablet, very minimal sexual activity, but realistic since it's not controlled B. Porn Style: This will give you the action you crave, at the expense of the "reality" you hope for. This is more like those reality porn sites like RealityKings. It's all scripted but passed off as real (to an extent). This seems to be the expectation of subscribers. After all, they aren't paying to see Lev on his tablet. :D C. "Real Life": This is what we have now. Minimal control, but at times you can see when there is direction at work. For example, Ilona getting into the shower with her underwear on, and doing a strip dance out of them. Clearly, not realistic but it entertains some subscribers. Which do you choose?

I sure hope so :D

(The Image Content is no longer accessible and has been removed).

She must have previously worked at Burger King. Why you may ask? Because she has a couple of massive Whoppers!

Hahaha, not at all! It's quite painful :lmao:

Oh for sure!! I'm suspicious of a corporation giving anything away for free. Either they are selling all your info to the highest bidder, or they are doing that to hook you then hit you with subscription fees later, like you mentioned. They'll make their money somehow. Adobe did that same model with Photoshop awhile ago with monthly subscriptions to use their product.

I'd like to weigh in here. So, be aware that I'm turning on Soapbox Mode :soapbox: First, I'm not a subscriber because the cost is rather high for me. I can't drop down an extra $42 CDN for even the most basic package, and certainly not $63 CDN for Premium. That being said, I would like to contribute to the forum. This is why I post pictures from the free areas. If I could afford the subscription, I would happily contribute from the "non-free" areas as well. When I see a shot that I think others would like, I take a screencap and post it. I even see those who have a subscription do the same with free areas from time to time.. As for posting vids, I have tried it with some software, but seeing as I'm on Ubuntu, I'm not sure of a high quality desktop recorder. I have taken some vids, such as Leora walking around in the nude. The results is so pixillated it's not worthy of putting up on the site. I could post horrible quality vids for you, wasting you time and mine. But, then you'd be mad about that too wouldn't you? So, in the end, both my financial and technical situation puts me in your cross-hairs and undeservedly so. I do my best to contribute to the site both by posting pics, but also talking with members, both in the forum and through PM. In fact, one member told me through PM he'll keep me updated on what happens in the non-free areas, why? He understands my situation and isn't smug looking down on those who are free members only. Others here post freely and willingly non-free, why? Because it' a community. So instead of sitting there high and mighty, maybe you should be happy that some do even bother to post even when they're criticized by people like you.

I would think it's circumstance right now. We really can't base anything on one day, if they continue to ignore one another or "play it safe" like the Sara and White did, then you know something must have been said. What I mean by "play it safe" is talk to one another when they see each other, but not get as "hand-on" like they did the first night.

Haha yep. That is the point. staged or not, have fun with it, all web porn is fake, if it's on cam and people know about it, there is always an element of acting.

Actually, you can watch Netflix on Linux, just install Chrome. I use it on Ubuntu, It uses HTML5 so no additional plugins required and works without a hitch. Yet another reason for people to get rid of SpyOS aka Windows. I mean, come on people there is a reason why it has a "free update". You can't turn off the spying features contrary to the "settings", and you can't turn off auto updates which, considering it's Microsoft, always has a bug in it, that they later have to roll out a new update to fix the old one, lol.

Exactly, and if someone comes along to offer the same or better than Rogers or Bell for cheaper, Rogers or Bell swoops in and buys them out. You're a wrestling fan (or maybe used to be?), the WWE Network is a good example of it. Rogers bought exclusive rights. For a time it was exclusive to them, and they presented a much watered down product as a TV station. But cooler heads prevailed and they offered the actual online, on-demand, content and for anyone of the various main TV/Internet providers. Point is, we get robbed because we only have two companies running the show up here. Our options are, get robbed brutally, or get robbed hardcore. lol.

Nope, I'm not kidding. It may not be her, but it sure looks like it is to me. I sent you a PM to help you out.

Hmm, this girl Irma looks identical to a porn star I am aware of. Given her near identical looks (everything but the tattoos which seem new anyway), and someone earlier saying she as telling someone about Ilona (perhaps the photographer she works with consistently), I'd say it's a 95-98% certainty that it's her. Unfortunately, I can't mention the site or her stage name since it's against forum rules.

What a lovely smile you have Leora (The Image Content is no longer accessible and has been removed).