Now, with nicholas, we are at the very least historical ... Possible that you can not have anna, rebecca, megan, ilona? Or, much more exciting, new girls but with a real showcasing spirit?
Someone here does not clearly understand the concept of customer and supplier !!! But the world is beautiful because it varies !! But it should also be said that if there are rules on the site, they must be well known. But hope is always the last to die.
However, although I am not democratic in mind, I use the power to say and write what I think. If it is not shared ok, but I want and I demand that it be respected. For me, too much time and ink have been spent on this.
from wikipedia
The term voyeurism or scopophilia, the rarest scoptofilia, is a paraffy that characterizes those who, in order to obtain sexual excitement and pleasure, desires and likes to watch or spy naked, bare or unwanted persons, or also persons involved in sexual intercourse . [1] Masturbation often accompanies the voyeuristic act.
When RLC says this is real life and a girl stays home for days and does not even wash. Then it's a grip for the ass. If one is two hours then I can understand that she is not naked. Miss X is out of place in the long run.
my mail send to RLC now:
I pay Reallifecam and replay to have the girls in nude home with heels, not to have a girl who is never naked and all who come out with heels. And it is already pretty much that this thing happens. I would say it is not in line with vs policy. If it is a voyeur site, the girls should be in the house and there is something to see.