vortios

I wrote it, because Marc told Olga (friend of hers with whom he spoke on the phone). Whether it is true or not, some things can be a montage, we are investigating something that Marc said, and that Barcelona people do not fit him ... but I will expand information. We know, that last night, they (Nicole and Marc) spoke using euphemisms, everyone came to the conclusion that RLC communicated the conversations that are leaking. So the information from yesterday afternoon was very filtered. I feel that I was misled with the date (I also filtered it), but it was the information that Marc himself gave. Did that make a sudden change of plans? I can never confirm that, unfortunately.

Nobody would kick the door (at least in Spain) Unless a serious crime was committed, which is not the case. But I think it's not good to upset the police (more when they know you're home). And I think that's understandable to all the countries in the world. Not because it is a serious fault (and I say that I speak of Spain), but because it is not the same to deal with a person pissed or very angry (you are going to ask a million questions) and that the situation is going to be very uncomfortable, Than talking to a policeman in good ways and that may even be more understandable. In my opinion, a mistake of the girls, was not open at first to the girls. I know they have orders not to open anybody unknown, but I hope they will have, from now on, this small contingency. That although improbable, we have already seen that it can be given.

The guy that I cover the camera and the one that was the night before the first time Miguel was, so I understand it was the same guy.

I do not go into what they did or did not, I meant the sexual partners she's had. Anyway tomorrow I will ask people if they have knowledge of these things, and I hope you also tell me the dates (since I can not remember when those meetings were). As was said, it was just curiosity.

Do not you remember the first guy she wore, that I plug the bathroom camera? That boy said he was Russian (he did not speak English or Spanish) And if I remember correctly (but it may be that my memory fails me) the night before Miguel first entered, she had the visit of another boy, with whom she also communicated in her language. But I do not know if it was the same boy, or was another ... that's why I have that doubt.

That you and many others do not care, first thing, it is just an opinion, there are other people who cares ... and secondly, that it is said or not said, it is no less true.

I have a question, was she with two Russian guys, or was it just one, who visited her twice?

Maybe not you.

I think you forget about the first boy that came out at dawn ... or the first Russian boy she brought (a real fiasco), but after she met Miguel, she also brought another Russian friend (the latter I am not Sure, or maybe you're wrong). But the accounts that are said, I do not leave ... I count that she has had three or four, maybe 5 sexual partners, that we know.

Why not let people think about what they want? Regardless of whether we like to not. You tell us every day that they have a right to your real life (I do not see anyone fighting your opinion), you are very free to say it over and over again, but that does not mean that others say otherwise. Sexual behaviors without a condom is a risk option (every year governments spend millions and millions on advertising to avoid sexually transmitted diseases) That a girl with Nicole's age and experience she has in sexual intercourse, It seems like a mockery (or worse, a girl with too little head) that she does not take protective measures. This is not moral opinion, but a measure of sexual hygiene. Having risky relationships is no joke. And much less a moral choice. It is a matter of being or not being responsible. Unfortunately, the 70s and 80s showed that an unresponsive sexuality led to the death of many people (with those things is not played)

I did not see much, but I'm convinced that Angie did not take off her clothes at any time since she arrived. As they say is a strange time to leave. Most clubs and clubs already have almost complete ticket lists, so finding a ticket at this time is almost impossible in trendy clubs. Also note that they are Carnabales, and although not much is celebrated in Barcelona, people leave party. As it is said, these hours are as rare to leave, as that night Nicole left at 3 a.m.

I think you're right about this. I do not think Danaya leaves the house because the police showed up at the house. I think it's a decision made long ago (I'd even say she came in with a set date to leave the house).

The police, I take the data of Marc, to put an administrative penalty (the typical fine). That's why the police asked him to accompany them (there were three policemen at the door) downstairs, where the police van was. With a warning that the next complaint, the fine could be of greater gravity.

This afternoon, Marcos (or Marc) as her friend Olga called her (the girl he talked to on the phone and asked her to give him the floor) This is known, because he was talking to her hands-free and the whole conversation was heard. Another thing she has said is that on March 1st, Nicole will leave the house bound for Paris.

Yes, it seems.

This was a comment from him when I arrived last night, this morning, I have not seen RLC.

The boy told Nicole, that yesterday he had done more than 300 km. Even he had traveled on the AVE (A type of train) So those bills were from him.

Without wishing to be right, I think they are train tickets. If they are fixed it seems that in the ticket below, there is the RENFE logo and in the one at the top right of the ticket (left as we read) you can also see the logo of the railway company.

More than talking, the police talk about a fine. For loud music at this time of night (so it seems not the first complaint they receive from the neighbors) and then by throwing a cigarette butt to the street (which was Nicole who threw it) With such bad luck that the police saw her throw her away. So to speak only, nothing. There was also a fine that went to the boy's name. And you say why the name of the boy? Because when the police asked who lived there, the boy said only Nicole and him.

The infrared light, the human eye does not see. So the occupants of the cameras, do not know if that light exists or not. Just an example. When Angie turns off the light, her shade is not completely down, so it always comes street light. You can usually see a little of the room, in that clear-dark that remains, until the moment the camera goes into night vision, at that moment, the room changes and we begin to see (after a flash) the room as if Was in black and white (actually we only see the infrared emission provided by these lamps) Without them, as has happened several times, we see the room in the dark.

What is it for you to say "ugly things"? I have read the last 20 pages, and I have not found any insult to anyone in the forum. Only disagreement of opinions. Moreover, they talk about things that the participants themselves have spoken in front of the cameras. So why are "ugly things"?

Moral statements, attacks on participants, even people who fight for what? To the participants? Why defend the participants and what? Who gives us the right to become Robin Hood? You think people really care about your opinion? People are more adult than they seem to say here. This is a forum open to people who see RLC, and who think about houses and their occupants, unfortunately, there will always be people who do not think like us, and can say things, which we would not say, but that gives us the right to Become the police that say what you can say and not say? Entering a free forum, we assume that there will be things that we will not like to read. As for the people who want to direct directly to the participants ... because they do not open a specific thread for that? That is to say, if I were a big fan of Irma, and I wanted to tell you things (of course I have no interest in doing so), there would be a thread dedicated to Irma, calling it "For Irma con amor ...", to forgive this little mockery. Now seriously. Live your fantasies with the girls, and film the movies you want with them, but remember there will be other people who do not see that same movie as you.

For me, that is the mistake of RLC, which left much of the hand, because the first time, the miraculous water finished almost well ... No one can say that it has images of anything illegal in that party ... But people are very uncaring, and they think that everything is permissible (more when you are in a country you do not know, and you have the youth just to make those mistakes) To think that RLC and other pages are not tracked by security agencies is to be innocent. Clari is, you can say, me as a customer, who gives me the most ... in fact, the only thing that I contribute, is our interest, not to lose our money.

Tests did, that was the problem. But the problem, which I want to convey to people, is that it is not what we think, or what people think about the use of illegal drugs, but, that a judge, dictate that the page must close the broadcast from a Of the houses ... and they fuck us all ... or is that no one thinks?

I have never denied that the girls come two and three times to the houses, but that they bring back the spectacle? When one offers a show, the good thing is to bring new ideas, no business, it becomes great repeating over and over again the same recipe.