*** New Software Coming Soon! Please Check for Important Information in the Read Me Section ***
SierraTM
-
Posts
3,164 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Points
14,930 [ Donate ]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Blogs
Competitions
Everything posted by SierraTM
-
Oh they do? RLC please see ---> Amelie & Assol please. If you have seen them, fucking take a look at them again. And again, because I don't see shit.
-
Can't argue against that but I think her friend Ariela might be hotter (at least for me)...
-
B2 Girls on Vacation - General Topic 2020 #4 (April)
SierraTM replied to Noldus's topic in B#2 Astra (08/02/16)
B2 is definitely the best GOV apartment right now for me. Mimi and Fiore are doing fine 🤩 And I have grown to like Ulyana. Really find that her to be cute, just like her pussy and finger-bating 😍 The rest? Fucking shit. -
Oh I missed this part. If I am correct, public transport in Barcelona is a bitch. The train is somewhat alright if u r not picky but the buses r just bad. The only good thing about public buses in Barcelona is the one that takes you from El Prat to the city center.
-
Max, my argument is NEVER ABOUT RLC KICKING THEM OUT OF THE HOUSE. My point is why the fuck are we again facing this situation, where we have 2 do-nothing dolls for at least two months in total or more and no replacements possible in sight??????????
-
I only tried to explain why RLC is keeping them. Of cos I know why RLC 'has to keep them'. I am not in self-denial, self-righteous mode like some of the lads here. If all Max said is you are "embarrassing himself" than he is in a good mood. Hahaha, alright you got me there. I have nothing against Max btw, he may go nutty sometimes I don't take his comments personally at all. If girls walk in and feel compelled to shut off the lights to take shower then RLC failed the girl and themselves. Yes, this is upsetting as well as compelling (to rant) at the same time. Especially when u see the name of the website. How fucking real life is that?
-
Hey I guess you may have yet to read my comments on Mimi in B2. I am not into show girls but I can't complain about them because they at least do provide sexual content.
-
I accept some people needs help in understanding what is being written. The scenario I want is for RLC to remove them from the project, meaning they are not paid for their stay here but like they always do (Serafima, Cindy etc), allowing the girls to stay in the house until they can find accommodation elsewhere. This will fulfill your 'empty room' argument, allowing not a blank screen but a trashy show as per ed2, and maybe also allowing subscribers to hope that these girls will somehow be willing to create sexual content. You are trying to say that I want them out of the house despite the COVID-19 situation but I have never in my comments, mentioned that. Please do not apply social justice on your keyboard. Why do you think RLC to keep A&A.... and on the project? Because they fail to do proper screening, they fail to implement a set of basic standard of content creation for the girls to follow and thus, they are left with these 2 girls doing nothing for a month which is becoming what we see so often. So that's why they have no other choice right now except to keep them in employment for another month or so at least, because they fail to take screening precaution earlier. This is the issue which I am angry about. Now we have the COVID-19 situation, so no remedy can be done and anyone who complains about this is apparently 'embarrassing himself' as per Max but I will take it because I am not here to collect likes and we have all seen this so often than not. It is disappointing really that we are watching the results of poor planning from RLC again and again, apartments after apartments and now people are asking me what RLC should be answering.
-
Well right now, since they are not going to be dropped off this project, this is the best scenario one (or rather I) can hope 🙁
-
I repeat my point again. Which is, why are they still in this project? And please read my reply to Naga, which you happily leave out the rest 😏
-
You misunderstood me. I believe RLC works this way (correct me if I am wrong). When they remove the names of the girls but these girls still stay in the house, they are off the project. And would you really prefer to look at an empty room? Of cos I don't Naga, but in all fairness, what there's to see anyway? And this 'empty room' argument is doing subscribers no favours.
-
Noldus, I just want girls who are in this project, be willing to 'create sexual content' and not do absolutely nothing and hang around until their time is up. Such girls should have no place in this project. This should not even be a preference, like the ones you mention, this should be the minimum requirement.
-
Oh my intelligence is definitely and by far, lower than yours. I stand in awe of your presence and I long to worship your intelligence. You are so kind and so helpful and filled with RLC knowledge. And as always, you are always correct.
-
If they are in a porn project, which means sexual content, and they do 'no sexual content', are they refusing to work? Are they merely less productive? And the girls are there to do sexual acts. If they are not, this website will ceases to exist. Especially when the 'pornhubs of the Interent' are pushing out all kinds of porn content (hidden & non-hidden voyeurism) and mostly for free. I see that our disagreement is on the issue of should employer retain non-working, or in your words, less-productive employees so that the desk will be filled and at least the office looks packed and other employees can make friends etc. In RLC's context, at least they have something to show on their cameras. I don't disagree with this except when you already know that these girls will not do any sexual content and will not even get naked (other than showering). When you keep girls who do some sexual content occasionally, once in awhile, longer than you probably should, I can't complain because your logic stands. But when you keep girls who do absolutely nothing, your logic don't stand. I believe this is the root of our disagreement.
-
Ahh so the COVID-19 situation actually rewards workers who do no work at all. Fantastic. Well, at least Trump can say he understands the COVID-19 situation much better than you. And that is really 'lowering the bar'.
-
This is not about them being able to be replaced or not. You still don't get it. If a factory has 2 workers who do no work at all whatsoever, but because the factory can't bring in new employees, they still keep these workers simply because although they do no work, they at least fill the space? What logic is this?
-
RLC can still provide them housing but get them off the project. You still don't see my point, these girls have been doing absolutely nothing, showing us absolutely nothing (not even a pussy look if i were to believe) before the virus ran riot in Europe. And what RLC will do is so just let it be until they can't leave. That's it. Easy money.
-
B2 Girls on Vacation - General Topic 2020 #4 (April)
SierraTM replied to Noldus's topic in B#2 Astra (08/02/16)
Wow I was about to log off b4 I saw your comment. Short but nice real (non-showy) bate 🤩 -
Both of you should read my comment carefully. Let me give you this rather brash but still apt scenario. Say 2 girls in a whorehouse refuse to take customers. The whorehouse madame still keep these girls in the whorehouse because she says we cannot bring in anyone else. So you have 2 girls in a whorehouse who aren't whoring. And the reason they are there, according to u guys, is they can't bring in anyone else at the moment. Makes sense?
-
No my question is why are they on this project if they are not going to do anything sexual? This is not about Spain on lockdown, of course if u have your senses you will know they can't leave but they not being able to leave does not mean they should be still on the project. We knew for a long time these girls are not going to do anything sexual. And they are still here. That's my point.
-
Why are they even in this project in the first place? They have no interest to do anything sexual on cameras. This is literally a one month COVID-19 vacation on our expense, that is if they are leaving.
-
I've been busy for the past few days so missed Monica's departure. So bye love, may we not see you again on this project so all the best to you & stay clear of Mr.Covid! Goodbye Monica!
-
Kapitolina, Assol and Amelie. The KAA girls. Time to put them on a plane back to where ever they came from. Should not be a problem for RLC since tickets should be cheaper now. If they are lucky, they might meet their very own Mr.Covid along the way 😏
-
B2 Girls on Vacation - General Topic 2020 #3 (March)
SierraTM replied to Noldus's topic in B#2 Astra (08/02/16)
Maybe it is time we accept that the RLC DEFENDER will always defend RLC (duh?) and is always right. So we either move on and ignore him or argue with him which is pointless anyway. This moderator you are trying to reason with is not, and will not reason on level ground with you. Either he will pick and choose your words, or ignore your points which might be valid but obviously not to his advantage. Which is why I always question, WHY THE FUCK IS HE A MODERATOR IN THE FIRST PLACE? Is it because he shares information about the RLC girls among those in private discussion, not available on public forum? Because I don't see the relevance of his existence so far. But anyway, there are plenty of such people around in the working society, it is normal. What can we do? Yes, it is always to RLC's advantage if the girls are going to offer the paying customers anything to watch. If the girls happen not to, RLC saves $$$ and just let it be. Who will lose out? The paying customers of course. -
What is Kapitolina's role exactly in this house? Other than wasting a bed and 3-4 cameras? And her friend Joy? And I have yet to even mention the 2 two night stalkers in the big bedroom?
