Political correctness.

[Aubrey]

Yep I do. An alternative course of action that if followed will result in less deaths and the end of Islamic extremism.  Don't hold your breath for it tho, this really isn't the place to share it, is it?

[Ozi]

Why not? A few have asked you for your solution.

[Aubrey]

Time: It would take fucking ages just to write, and the same amount of time to check I've got all my facts straight before opening it up to the likes of you to rip apart.

Inclination: A group of people who advocate juicing West African Ebola victims into some kind of aerosol and then spraying that across the Middle East are not going to dispassionately consider anything that could potentially mean less brown people being dying.

Location: As I've repeatedly said this is a forum about consenting voyeurism, I'm not going to put in that kind of effort for an audience of 5 - ok an audience of 2 (probably 1) discounting the various alts :D  That you old boys use this for something else is a source of amusement for me and my comments are not designed to make you laugh, they are me laughing at you.  I'm not looking for respect from people who seriously consider ebola as a weapon against intolerance (and all the rest that you people have posted over the months), they are disrespecting your Draconian world view.

You have the right to your extremist views, I find them as distasteful as Islamic fundamentalism so I'm exercising my right to sending you up on them.  If this was a forum called www.IHateTheDarkiesDon'tJoinIFYouDon'tThinkWeSHouldKillThemAll.com then things would no doubt be different and I'm sure that both of our rights to free speech would be severely curtailed.

[Ozi]

Time: It would take fucking ages just to write, and the same amount of time to check I've got all my facts straight before opening it up to the likes of you to rip apart.

Inclination: A group of people who advocate juicing West African Ebola victims into some kind of aerosol and then spraying that across the Middle East are not going to dispassionately consider anything that could potentially mean less brown people being dying.

Location: As I've repeatedly said this is a forum about consenting voyeurism, I'm not going to put in that kind of effort for an audience of 5 - ok an audience of 2 (probably 1) discounting the various alts :D  That you old boys use this for something else is a source of amusement for me and my comments are not designed to make you laugh, they are me laughing at you.  I'm not looking for respect from people who seriously consider ebola as a weapon against intolerance (and all the rest that you people have posted over the months), they are disrespecting your Draconian world view.

You have the right to your extremist views, I find them as distasteful as Islamic fundamentalism so I'm exercising my right to sending you up on them.  If this was a forum called www.IHateTheDarkiesDon'tJoinIFYouDon'tThinkWeSHouldKillThemAll.com then things would no doubt be different and I'm sure that both of our rights to free speech would be severely curtailed.

In other words, you don't have anything.

[Aubrey]

In actual words, what I wrote.

[Ozi]

Israel must grow to defend itself. It needs more territory for an ever growing population, needed to expand its military forces.  If Israel was ever caught up in a one-on-one war with Egypt, they could potentially lose. It is more than feasible that it could take out Syria. A safer course of action would be either Jordan or Lebanon, neither of whom are military threats and are easily defeated. In fact, Israel could defeat both Jordan and Lebanon simultaneously with perfectly-planned invasions.

Depending on the outcome of current circumstances, Iran and Iraq are likely to go to war against each other. This would be a protracted conflict with both sides trying to develop nuclear weapons. An exchange of nuclear weapons would trigger a global holocaust, a potential outcome.

Egypt could also decide to go to war against Israel, and Syria, sooner or later, would join the conflict, mopping up Jordan and Lebanon on the way. The main problem would be ensuring that Egypt and Syria attack concurrently, so as not to create a protracted war.

The optimal solution for Israel seems to be to take Egypt out immediately with a perfect surprise attack using a single brigade to push the war right to the Egyptian side, followed by invading Lebanon before it collapses and Jordan before anyone else invades it, while attempting to topple Iran by espionage (to prevent nuclear war with Iraq) and then, finally, invading and defeating Syria. It is important to take out any nuclear installations in the other countries, so as to prevent rivals from gaining nuclear weapons. This can be done via airstrikes, but only before an invasion. Israel risks getting nuked if the opposing side completes an installation during war.

And the cost of this solution, nothing. It’s the possible strategies from Conflict: Middle East Political Simulator and can be downloaded free.

Used correctly, it currently has as much chance as any other solution put forward by military experts, political experts, religious experts, think tanks, UN councils or armchair warriors, absolutely none.

[woodworker]

You'll die of thirst trying to draw water from that well Ozi.  Aubrey's got nothing.

[Aubrey]

"Is there a mouse in the well George, huh George, is there? Lemme find it George, I'll love it so much George."

[woodworker]

Aubrey:  "Now where did I misplace my superior intellect?"  "I know it's around here somewhere."

[Ozi]

Quote:

Angela Merkel said that Germans have failed to grasp how Muslim immigration has transformed their country and will have to come to terms with more mosques than churches throughout the countryside, according to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily.

“Our country is going to carry on changing, and integration is also a task for the society taking up the task of dealing with immigrants,” Ms. Merkel told the daily newspaper. “For years we’ve been deceiving ourselves about this. Mosques, for example, are going to be a more prominent part of our cities than they were before.”  Merkel’s remarks represent the first official acknowledgement that Germany, like other European countries, is destined to become a stronghold of Islam. She has admitted that the country will soon become a stronghold.

Now lots of people are going to say here we go again, another uneducated racist, spreading hate and fear amongst the German people, fuelling the racists and bigots that support her views.

But, for those that don’t know her, the significance being that Angela Merkal is the German Chancellor. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but that’s the equivalent of the British or Australian Prime Minister, the elected, sorry, re-elected leader of the country.

And that from one of the most powerful and influential member countries of Europe. Who could have guessed it.

[woodworker]

To me, people who have just sat back and allowed this to happen, had no respect for that of their own heritage.  Germany, once a beautiful country, also had more than it's fair share of great composers.

All gone to waste now.    Just more cause and effect from failed liberal policies.

[Aubrey]

Quote:

Angela Merkel said that Germans have failed to grasp how Muslim immigration has transformed their country and will have to come to terms with more mosques than churches throughout the countryside, according to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily.

“Our country is going to carry on changing, and integration is also a task for the society taking up the task of dealing with immigrants,” Ms. Merkel told the daily newspaper. “For years we’ve been deceiving ourselves about this. Mosques, for example, are going to be a more prominent part of our cities than they were before.”  Merkel’s remarks represent the first official acknowledgement that Germany, like other European countries, is destined to become a stronghold of Islam. She has admitted that the country will soon become a stronghold.

Now lots of people are going to say here we go again, another uneducated racist, spreading hate and fear amongst the German people, fuelling the racists and bigots that support her views.

But, for those that don’t know her, the significance being that Angela Merkal is the German Chancellor. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but that’s the equivalent of the British or Australian Prime Minister, the elected, sorry, re-elected leader of the country.

And that from one of the most powerful and influential member countries of Europe. Who could have guessed it.

The full translated quote:

http://www.unaoc.org/ibis/2010/11/01/merkel-on-mosques-in-germany/

Chancellor Angela Merkel pointed out in an interview with the “Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung” that integration was an important task for German people facing immigration. Germans need to accept that immigration is changing the character of the country. Indeed, “mosques will be a more prominent part of [the] urban landscape than before.” Merkel reminded that the German constitution guarantees freedom of religion. Respect and tolerance can only be guaranteed if laws and all articles of the constitution are respected.

The University of Osnabrueck has launched a program that goes in this direction: training Muslim spiritual leaders to help Muslim communities to integrate.

It's quite easy to pick bits out of translated reports then add a bit of guff in the way you do Ozi that I'm sure gets people like Woody hard but she is in fact saying that Muslim people are required to follow the laws of Germany if they wish to be tolerated.

I love the fact that you have to explain to your cretins who Angela Merkel is and you feel the need to explain that the title of Chancellor means that she performs a similar function to Prime Ministers in our respective countries. That's what I'm talking about right there, fucking beautiful, thanks.