B4 - General Topic 2025 #63 (December)

[Alladino]

8 minutes ago, Captain Kangaroo said:

They're women. They don't need a reason to whip up some fake tears 😏🤣

Did you catch the time when Samson cried?

 

The problem with comments like this is that they serve no purpose other than potentially making the writer look like a complete idiot. We don't know what the background is. Do you really want to come across as someone who makes fun of someone who might be worried about someone else, etc.? Maybe someone is sick or has to defend their country. That's not funny.  

Let's be serious, we should not forget that the residents are just human beings. 

[Captain Kangaroo]

CC Is so FULL OF CRYING SUCK TIT BITCHES IT'S REDIC!!! You Whinners make this place TOXIC AS FUCK!!!

[Captain Kangaroo]

2 minutes ago, Alladino said:

 

The problem with comments like this is that they serve no purpose other than potentially making the writer look like a complete idiot. We don't know what the background is. Do you really want to come across as someone who makes fun of someone who might be worried about someone else, etc.? Maybe someone is sick or has to defend their country. That's not funny.  

Let's be serious, we should not forget that the residents are just human beings. 

NO WHERE in my QUESTION was I making fun of ANYONE!!!

[Xarvaz]

11 minutes ago, Brit Guy said:

Who said Christina is her real name? I quite clearly stated the cleaning lady is 'known as' Christina on the other forum. Doesn't mention anything about a real name at all.

The B4 cat is known as Sofie on the other forum but Zucchini on here ...and if that's its 'real' name then perhaps we shouldn't be using it 😆

It doesn't matter what you call someone, to find someone you just need a picture and within 10 minutes you'll have that person, It's an illusion to think that a made-up name protects someone but since it's the forum rules I'll just stick to the fake name.. What I find annoying are people who act like forum dads but are not admins 

[thereala78]

6 minutes ago, Alladino said:

 

The problem with comments like this is that they serve no purpose other than potentially making the writer look like a complete idiot. We don't know what the background is. Do you really want to come across as someone who makes fun of someone who might be worried about someone else, etc.? Maybe someone is sick or has to defend their country. That's not funny.  

Let's be serious, we should not forget that the residents are just human beings. 

Be careful, you're too nice, you will be flammed by haters 🤣

Maybe he was joking... we can joke sometimes... while we don't know the real reasons... 😉 

[Brit Guy]

3 minutes ago, Alladino said:

 

The problem with comments like this is that they serve no purpose other than potentially making the writer look like a complete idiot. We don't know what the background is. Do you really want to come across as someone who makes fun of someone who might be worried about someone else, etc.? Maybe someone is sick or has to defend their country. That's not funny.  

Let's be serious, we should not forget that the residents are just human beings. 

They are 'just' human beings yes, I agree. What they are NOT though is objects for viewers sexual gratification who also seem to feel they are entitled to see nudity and sexual activity most of the time. The FACT is this is the participants choice ...NOT the viewers and being pressured by them in to doing something they may not want to because they have complete freedom to make this choice. I rest my case, thank you 👏👏👏 

[Brit Guy]

5 minutes ago, Xarvaz said:

It doesn't matter what you call someone, to find someone you just need a picture and within 10 minutes you'll have that person, It's an illusion to think that a made-up name protects someone but since it's the forum rules I'll just stick to the fake name.. What I find annoying are people who act like forum dads but are not admins 

Oh for sure ...dads here insisting we respect the participants ...meanwhile the same dads watching girls naked whilst showering and bating. This forum is just too funny at times 😆😆😆

[Xarvaz]

1 minute ago, Brit Guy said:

Oh for sure ...dads here insisting we respect the participants ...meanwhile the same dads watching girls naked whilst showering and bating. This forum is just too funny at times 😆😆😆

Who was it again who said that Karma was the daughter he never had but got lame arms when he looked at her and Chris... it's a good thing they don't have a daughter 🥶

[Captain Kangaroo]

12 minutes ago, Xarvaz said:

It doesn't matter what you call someone, to find someone you just need a picture and within 10 minutes you'll have that person, It's an illusion to think that a made-up name protects someone but since it's the forum rules I'll just stick to the fake name.. What I find annoying are people who act like forum dads but are not admins 

When Everyone in the Project starts calling her SWEATLANA BETTIE BARNEY WILMA DAPHNE JESSICA or something else then I will too. If I wanted to know anything about her I would follow her IG like the rest of the Stalkers on here do. And I agree with your last statement 100

[Alladino]

2 minutes ago, Brit Guy said:

They are 'just' human beings yes, I agree. What they are NOT though is objects for viewers sexual gratification who also seem to feel they are entitled to see nudity and sexual activity most of the time. The FACT is this is the participants choice ...NOT the viewers and being pressured by them in to doing something they may not want to because they have complete freedom to make this choice. I rest my case, thank you 👏👏👏 

 

That's the deal. I'm a voyeur and I pay to see what I wouldn't otherwise see. It is about the "private life of other people". If a girl doesn't stick to this deal, I naturally have a reason to be disappointed and call it out for what it is.

Ultimately, I'm aiming for a win-win situation here. RLC and the girls get money, and I get a voyeur-like experience. None of the sides are doing any charity here and yet you can still remain respectful towards each other. 

Anyway, B4 currently has a comparatively good cast. A lot of attractive and sympatic girls, no issue with nudity in front of the camera, and with 1 or 2 exceptions (im still not sure about one girl) no issue with beeing sexual activ in front of the camera either. For me, this is one of the few apartments that really works well at the moment on RLC. Not perfect, but good. 

 

 

[thereala78]

25 minutes ago, Alladino said:

That's the deal. I'm a voyeur and I pay to see what I wouldn't otherwise see. It is about the "private life of other people". If a girl doesn't stick to this deal, I naturally have a reason to be disappointed and call it out for what it is.

Ultimately, I'm aiming for a win-win situation here. RLC and the girls get money, and I get a voyeur-like experience. None of the sides are doing any charity here and yet you can still remain respectful towards each other. 

Anyway, B4 currently has a comparatively good cast. A lot of attractive and sympatic girls, no issue with nudity in front of the camera, and with 1 or 2 exceptions (im still not sure about one girl) no issue with beeing sexual activ in front of the camera either. For me, this is one of the few apartments that really works well at the moment on RLC. Not perfect, but good. 

I fully agree with that... respect and B4 current situation 🙂 

[Brit Guy]

38 minutes ago, Alladino said:

 

That's the deal. I'm a voyeur and I pay to see what I wouldn't otherwise see. It is about the "private life of other people". If a girl doesn't stick to this deal, I naturally have a reason to be disappointed and call it out for what it is.

Ultimately, I'm aiming for a win-win situation here. RLC and the girls get money, and I get a voyeur-like experience. None of the sides are doing any charity here and yet you can still remain respectful towards each other. 

Anyway, B4 currently has a comparatively good cast. A lot of attractive and sympatic girls, no issue with nudity in front of the camera, and with 1 or 2 exceptions (im still not sure about one girl) no issue with beeing sexual activ in front of the camera either. For me, this is one of the few apartments that really works well at the moment on RLC. Not perfect, but good. 

 

 

And which deal is that then as nobody has ever seen a contract between RLC and the participants in what they are obliged legally to do. Your voyeur-like experience is paying for access to the apartments, and what goes on in them is up to the resident/s, not the viewers. I think viewers like yourself are clearly feeling hard done by in believing RLC offers endless sexual content when it clearly does not, so some here turn to pressuring the participants into events they may not want to participate in. Also, as far as I know how I feel about RLC and what the participants do is not a bad thing so why people think they are entitled to nudity and sexual content is beyond me as I especially not desperate to see EVERY participant in the nude or participating in sexual content. As you stated they are only human and that they are not objects of/for sexual gratification for the viewers.