B1 - General Topic 2026 #4 (February / March)

[thereala78]

4 hours ago, FrankZabba said:

i commend RLC for kicking out the streamers, that is not what RLC is all about nor should it be.

lol they didn't kick them out, but if you believe in... good for you... happy man 😀

[Brit Guy]

5 hours ago, FrankZabba said:

give yourself a LMAO

I had a wank instead ...went 1 step further.

[FrankZabba]

Just now, Brit Guy said:

I had a wank instead ...went 1 step further.

that's nice

[FrankZabba]

40 minutes ago, thereala78 said:

lol they didn't kick them out, but if you believe in... good for you... happy man 😀

you are the great-------------defender!  oh, and know it all!

[thereala78]

7 minutes ago, FrankZabba said:

you are the great-------------defender!  oh, and know it all!

I can defend them, sometimes and even often 😛 

But that's irrelevant here... and yes, I know that for sure 😉 
But maybe it's the case for D&S... that I don't know 🙂 

[Brit Guy]

20 minutes ago, FrankZabba said:

that's nice

Having wanks generally are nice I thought ...thanks though.

[illy]

48 minutes ago, thereala78 said:

Any other paid activity is prohibited, yes (OF, CB, etc.).

But that's in no way the reason for Neytiri and Nani's departure, which had been planned for a long time... As for Aya, the same applies, albeit for a different reason.

RLC does what they want with their own rules and when it suits them 😛 

The rule as I've heard tenants themselves explain it is that content making is perfectly fine so long as the content in question is not personalised to such a degree that it points towards there being a buyer. The example given was a name being spoken or written.

I've never heard the rule explained well enough to know if the point behind it is to prevent a buyer from being identified or if RLC are just trying to maintain the illusion of everything on cam happening only for the RLC viewers by not having tenants so obviously give clues of who they're actually making their content for instead. Maybe it's both. But none of us were born yesterday - we all know what is happening when the ring lights are turned on and that the resulting streams/videos are going to other people. So if the rule really is one of 'make your content, but only if it doesn't give away how it's meant for some other site' then it's a bit of a silly one and largely unenforceable.

[CuriousOne693]

1 hour ago, thereala78 said:

Or they need it for 3 returnees 😁

Then we still sit with the mystery of why the 2 stunning lesbians are leaving, if they are indeed leaving.

[CuriousOne693]

BTW can someone pretty please ask RLC to change a like from a heart to a thumbs-up 🤣

[thereala78]

33 minutes ago, illy said:

The rule as I've heard tenants themselves explain it is that content making is perfectly fine so long as the content in question is not personalised to such a degree that it points towards there being a buyer. The example given was a name being spoken or written.

I've never heard the rule explained well enough to know if the point behind it is to prevent a buyer from being identified or if RLC are just trying to maintain the illusion of everything on cam happening only for the RLC viewers by not having tenants so obviously give clues of who they're actually making their content for instead. Maybe it's both. But none of us were born yesterday - we all know what is happening when the ring lights are turned on and that the resulting streams/videos are going to other people. So if the rule really is one of 'make your content, but only if it doesn't give away how it's meant for some other site' then it's a bit of a silly one and largely unenforceable.

I think the reasons are simple and completely understandable from RLC side...

RLC are hosting girls free and paying them for living their life on cam... they don't pay them an apt or a villa with a pool to allow them making content for an alternative paying site...

It's the same thing as if you used the tools you have at your work to do another paid work... 

Also, they could think that if viewers can see girls in other site OF, CB,... they could unsub from RLC and then pay to follow them on these site...

[Maxbell]

1 hour ago, CuriousOne693 said:

BTW can someone pretty please ask RLC to change a like from a heart to a thumbs-up 🤣

But I love ❤️ your comments!! 😂
Totally agree, they also need a ‘wow’ emoji

😮🙀😱
 

Edit, you meant CC not RLC of course. 😉

[CuriousOne693]

1 hour ago, thereala78 said:

I think the reasons are simple and completely understandable from RLC side...

RLC are hosting girls free and paying them for living their life on cam... they don't pay them an apt or a villa with a pool to allow them making content for an alternative paying site...

It's the same thing as if you used the tools you have at your work to do another paid work... 

Also, they could think that if viewers can see girls in other site OF, CB,... they could unsub from RLC and then pay to follow them on these site...

I hear you, and that is the one point of view. The other point of view seems to be that this is allowed, as long as third parties' names/details are not revealed. Dunno?