Ozi

Don't forget, you also have to look at quality as well as quantity. A language spoken predominantly by illiterate peasants doesn't really qualify as a dominant language.

She is in the lounge, but I can only assume she has learnt to masturbate using mental telepathy, unless of course she is following Paul's lead and it was over in 3 mins. I've been watching her for the last 30 mins while I've been logged on and nothing is happening. I don't know what themysteryguest is watching, it's all a mystery to me!

I suggest you check the validity of your source: 1 Mandarin (Chinese) 2 Spanish 3 English 4 Hindi 5 Arabic These stats are from sources like The Linguistics Society and Ethnologue.

Learn Spanish, which is the language most spoken in the world 8) El español es el idioma màs hablado en el mundo. Actually it's not. The language spoken by the most people in the world is Mandarin, well over twice as many as those that speak Spanish. In fact Spanish is only spoken by about 1% more of the world's population than English, significant but far from dominant.

GERMAN is the cultural language of the poet and thinker! THE language of intelligence Anglo-American is only cheaper substitute for understanding Learn german Why? English is the official language of over 60 countries in the world, German in only 6. English is spoken by around 5.5% of the world's population. Not really that many, but 4 times as many as those that speak German, which is only spoken by less than 1.4% of the world's population. If you are going to waste your time learning a new language, try Arabic, our new masters will be impressed. Or if you want to communicate with the masses on CC, try Yoda speak. And before the French posters get on their high horse, despite their efforts, sorry, failed efforts to dominate any significant part of the world, only 1.2% of the world speak French, less than the Germans.

This site doesn't have a real structure and closing down "annoying threads" could be a poor decision, besides saying that something like Buster is correct send a very negative message of what this site is about... Buster is correct. Is that negative enough for you?

The pen might be mightier than the sword, but who fights with a fucking sword.

Hey, here's an idea, something you Neanderthals that still use expressions like "his woman" will understand. How about Leora doing something about satisfying "her man". I'm sure Paul is just as unsatisfied as she is. Maybe Leora could take the initiative.

Rules of Engagement, seen by some as another piece of political correctness gone wrong, is an important guideline for those that have to abide by it, in real life, especially when we are fighting a different war, a different type of enemy, sometimes street by street, house by house. Ten questions I put to my new guys after they've gone all gung-ho, with the most common answers: 1. Have you ever shot a kid? Of course not. 2. Have you ever shot a woman? No. 3. Have you ever shot an old man? No, never 4. Have you ever shot anyone? Not really 5. Have you ever shot AT anyone? Well, actually no. 6. Have you ever been shot? Fuck no 7. Have you ever been shot AT? Not really, I guess not 8. Could you shoot someone? Shit yeah 9. Shoot an old man or woman? Yeah, maybe 10.How about a kid? Well I guess, fuck no Easy isn't it, even with all the training.

My comments (with the exception of assholes like you and ozi and a couple of others) rag on those that have volunteered to be on display on RLC. You and your cronies choose to rag on other camcap members rather than rag on those on RLC. You guys are fucking bullies on here and no doubt in real life. As a result, I am making it my camcaps secondary mission to rag on you and ozi and others pricks who enjoy making fun of others. So bring it on asshole!! You're camcaps secondary mission! Wow, I've never felt so intimidated, or important. You must have a boring life if I can influence you're actions so much. So, you can 'rag on' members on RLC, who are all obviously inferior men to you, but please leave the poor fuckwits on cc alone. Ok, I should know better than to pick on retards, you win.

Another super stud. Tell you what mate, instead of whining, and that's you and probably 50% of the posters on cc, why don't you do something about it. Go out and find yourself a girlfriend. But not just any girlfriend, she has to be at least as good looking as the girl WITH Paul. Then, contact RLC and get yourself one of their apartments. Problem solved, you can show us all how it should be done. Yes, I am not surprised Buster likes your comment. Two peas in a pod. And obviously clueless about both how to make love to a woman and the basic point of this website. If you two don't like what 99% of the people on this website have to say about the way Paul attempts, in vain, to satisfy his woman then why don't you two take your idiot comments to another site? Because I'm hoping to learn from the Master. I've only been happily married to the same woman for thirty five years, raised three awesome kids and still enjoy regular and incredible sex with my wife. I'm trying to figure out where I went wrong. Can you help me?

There is nothing in history that is going to either assist us today in relation to the muslim problem in Europe or the rest of the world, this is not a traditional type of war. Before you can successfully fight an enemy, you have to know your enemy, you have to understand their tactics. “Gaddafi - We have 50 million Muslims in Europe. There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe—without swords, without guns, without conquest—will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades”. If you can be bothered to read this, and I apoligise for it's length and the fact that for expediency I am only quoting from one source but there are credible references within it, you might better understand the problem. Muslim immigration to Europe continues apace, with record numbers of new arrivals daily in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and across Scandinavia. In Britain, Holland and Spain, the rate of Muslim immigration is accelerating at an especially rapid clip, and in a shorter amount of time than in other European countries. Islam is already the fastest-growing religion in Europe, where the number of Muslims has tripled over the past 30 years. Most demographers forecast a similar or even higher rate of growth in the coming decades. European society has created a huge spiritual vacuum that Islam is eager, willing and determined to fill, due to a near-wholesale rejection of the Judeo-Christian worldview, fuelling a demographic time bomb, planted by Europeans who see no meaning to human life beyond the present, and who do not believe in the future enough to want to pass it on to the next generation. Birth rates among native Europeans are far below replacement levels in most European countries. By contrast, Muslim immigrants in Europe are procreating at a breakneck pace, with birth rates that in many cases are double or triple those of native European populations. The exact number of Muslims in Europe is difficult to calculate, largely because the official census data collected by many European countries does not track population trends according to ethnicity or religion. But the Berlin-based Zentralinstitut Islam-Archiv, the oldest Islamic organization in Germany, estimates that 54 million Muslims were living in Europe in 2007, including 16 million in the European Union. According to a US Air Force study conducted by Major Leon Perkowski in 2006, the EU's Muslim population could actually be as high as 23 million if estimates on illegal immigration are included. In any case, most surveys agree that Muslims currently constitute around five percent of the EU's total population (compared to around one percent in the United States). On a country-by-country basis, Muslim residents currently represent about eight percent of the population in France, six percent in Holland, four percent in Belgium and Germany, and three percent in Britain. Although these numbers may seem relatively insignificant at first glance, Muslim immigrants are clustering in large European cities, many of which are being transformed beyond recognition by their Muslim inhabitants. In Amsterdam, Brussels and Marseilles, for example, between 20 and 25 percent of the population is now estimated to be Muslim, according to official municipal statistics and a variety of unofficial calculations. In Birmingham, Cologne, Copenhagen, Leicester, London, Paris, Rotterdam, Stockholm, Strasbourg and The Hague, the Muslim population is now estimated to be between 10 and 20 percent. In Antwerp, Berlin, Hamburg and Vienna, the Muslim population is estimated to be between 5 and 10 percent. Analyst Ömer Taşpınar, writing for the Washington, DC-based Brookings Institution, estimates that the Muslim birth rate in Europe is three times higher than the non-Muslim one, and that Europe's Muslim population currently is growing by more than one million each year. If current trends continue, the Muslim population of Europe will nearly double by 2015, while the non-Muslim population will shrink by 3.5 percent. According to the Migration Policy Institute, which is also based in Washington, at least 20 percent of Europe's total population will be Muslim by 2050 (this figure would jump to well over 50 percent if Turkey joins the EU.) Muslims are already transforming European society in ways unimaginable only a few years ago. In Britain, for example, the government recently acquiesced to adopting Islamic law, with Sharia courts given full powers to rule on Muslim civil cases. In Holland, Mohamed, or other variations of the name, has become the most popular name for baby boys in the four biggest cities in the country In Spain, the Muslim population has increased ten-fold in just 20 years. As recently as 1990, there were only 100,000 Muslims there; now there are more than 1 million. Immigration, however, is only one reason for the steady rise in Spain's Muslim population. Muslim fertility rates are more than double those of an aging native Spanish population. Spain currently has a birth rate of around 1.3, far below the replacement rate of 2.1 children per couple. At the current rate, the number of native Spaniards will be cut in half in two generations, while the Muslim population in Spain will quadruple. Princeton University's Bernard Lewis once told the German newspaper Die Welt that "Europe will be Islamic by the end of the century." At the time, European political elites expressed outrage at the prediction. But if current trends persist, Lewis (and Gaddafi) may yet be proven right.

Ok, the general consensus seems to be we declare war on muslims. So where do we start? How about an easy one, we can have the first front in North America, there’s only about 8 million between the US and Canada. But where do we send them, or do we just shoot them all. After that, the countries around Australia and New Zealand, wouldn’t want to leave our allies out in the cold. Besides, there’s only about 2 million in that whole region, good training ground for our troops. Just make sure we stay well clear of Indonesian waters, wouldn’t want them to get wind of what we are doing, there’s 218 million of them, not ready for that fight yet. Next one is a biggy, Europe. There’s 56 million of the fuckers over there. But hang on, back up a bit, let’s not forget the 2 million in South America, wouldn’t want those shifty little bastards creeping up on our rear flank now would we. See, that was easy, just 1.9 billion to go.

Another super stud. Tell you what mate, instead of whining, and that's you and probably 50% of the posters on cc, why don't you do something about it. Go out and find yourself a girlfriend. But not just any girlfriend, she has to be at least as good looking as the girl WITH Paul. Then, contact RLC and get yourself one of their apartments. Problem solved, you can show us all how it should be done.

And how do you intend to use these drones in the suburbs of Paris, Rome, London or Washington for that matter? The muslims in the middle east are fighting a civil war. Leave them alone. We don't give a second thought to the terrorists in Africa and other regions. The muslim threat in Europe is the muslims living in Europe. Same as the muslim threat in the US is the muslims living in the US. Thanks to immigration policies approved by governments in almost every country under threat, these muslims are now citizens. Some are now 1st, 2nd, even 3rd generation born and bred. Some are representatives within our governments. Many are in the military and police forces. How do you identify, separate then remove them? The Golden Dawn is a far right political party in Greece. Despite it's own PR campaign, it is actually losing ground, holding around 7% of the general vote in an election in the first half of the year and sliding further down in the second election in 2014. It is not even remotely representative of the general population, so don't expect anything constructive from the Greeks. The 4 million that marched in France were not protesting against Islam, despite the worst terrorist atrocity on home soil. What they were doing was promoting solidarity, so don't expect anything constructive from the French either. The UK? They arrest their own politicians for speaking out against muslims. And Germany? If the far right gets a hold there, they will be too busy fighting each other. Forget the bombs, forget the drones, forget the weapons. These are always easy solutions for people that never have or never will have to use them AND they simply won't work. You don't want to start urban warfare. (Possessing weapons to protect myself and my family is a different issue and THAT will work.) Close the borders, repatriate those that don't have ties. Offer incentives to leave. Family unification can travel in both directions, only one if you close the borders. What's left? A minority, treat it like one. And the money we save? Spend it fixing the countries we helped to fuck and make them somewhere people will want to live.

Granted, she did have a hot fuck session with Paul last week (doggie style, in bed, in full view of the camera's, which is WAY different for her), WAY different based on? Leora is a show pony, always has been. Sex in full view is nothing new. Same type of comment the other day from someone when she was naked on the lounge. He claimed she remembered the camera and covered herself. Leora doesn't forget the cameras, she plays to them.

Just in case some missed the point, the original Nazi anthem version banned after the war.

Lack of respect in society isn't a new thing, it goes back a generation or two, which is where all the shit started. When my kids where still in primary school, they were taught new ideas about their rights, their entitlement to privacy. Well that didn't work with my family, my house - my rules. My kids were taught respect; respect for their parents, respect for their elders, respect for the law. They were taught to earn a living, all three had part-time jobs while still at school. Incidentally, my kids are all grown up living in different states in Australia with their own kids now. I don't see them as often as I'd like, but guess what, each one of them rings me and their mother every week, without fail. They talk to each other every week, to see how they are going, offer help or support if needed. And their spouses do the same, not always with their own parents but with us, their in-laws. Respect produces respect. Now we have no respect for anything or anyone. Why? because a generation or two back, kids were taught they had rights, they were taught the bullshit that respect had to be earned. So tell me, why should parents have to earn the right to be respected by their children? Why should a teacher have to earn respect from his pupils? How does a policeman earn respect from someone he may have only ever met once? What gives someone the right to not respect someone else's property? The generation that was taught they have rights, are owed a living by society if they can't be bothered to support themselves, taught that everyone, including authority has to earn respect, are now the generation of lazy, bludging crack heads bringing up another generation that's even worse. If we had never been given these so called rights, people wouldn't have ended up as crack head parents that think the world owes them a living. If people were taught respect for other people and their property, then maybe the punishments would be more in line with what is needed to deter people. What we have ended up with now is anarchy and until people start to show some respect for themselves and for other people, nothing is going to change, and waiting for people to 'earn' respect won't get us anywhere. Oh, and just in case you lot missed it while we were all holding hands and singing kumbaya over the dead cartoonists and three police officers, Boko Haram, an Islamic militant group, took out an entire village of about 2,000 people, then used girls as young as 10 as suicide bombers. Not sure when the rallies for these people will be held, but I'm sure we'll hear about it. Maybe it will appear in notices in Charlie Hebdo.

Two police officers died as a direct result of the attack on Charlie Hebdo, yet the wife of the editor is now blaming the government for not doing enough. She said her husband had the guts to print the cartoons yet the government did nothing to protect them, ignoring the hate mail and threats, protecting those responsible. Tell that to the families of the two police officers who died, as well as the third who died in the second planned incident involved with the plot. And the first response to my original post: "maybe you didn't get them". Yeah, lets get our priorities right here. Now many of the muslims living in France and other parts of Europe, who shouldn't be there in the first place, will benefit from this show of solidarity from the masses. It's already happening in Australia. My government has never put me in harms way for something as inane as protecting some fuckwits right to draw stupid cartoons, but the day may come when I may be expected to protect some radical, minority groups right to freedom of speech, freedom of expression, which goes against all that Australia stands for. Can anyone see the double standards here? I can only hope that day never comes.

It's likely you simply don't get them then. I didn't say they weren't funny, I said they weren't that funny and if you ever bothered reading the publication, and I have read numerous translated articles from a friend of mine, they are very repetitive. I get a lot of amusement from cartoons, my father is a cartoonist. But, like the mainstream masses, you missed the point. Did they really achieve anything? Apart from providing a job and income for a few people, no. Were they worth dying for? I doubt it. And if you are going to scream about freedom of speech and freedom of the press, let's fight for freedom of speech where it really counts, and how about we fight for a free press, that would be worth dying for.

Twelve people died, including 10 staff at the Charlie Hebdo office in Paris. I feel sorry for the families and colleagues of the two police officers killed trying to protect them, such a waste of life. The others died for what, cartoons and cynical articles with a circulation of 50,000? Certainly a world changing publication. The reality is their life's work achieved absolutely nothing apart from amusing a few people with stupid, repetitive cartoons and articles that in all honesty, weren't necessarily that funny. Most people outside of France hadn't even heard of them. Now dead after an Islamic terrorist attack, the whole world knows them. Has their death achieved anything? I doubt it, other than polarising the majority of the population towards solidarity and promoting appeasement, concessions to an enemy in order to avoid conflict. A recent attack by a lone gunman, tagged a terrorist attack, left two dead, one by the terrorist and the other by a ricochet from a police round. Now the government wants a memorial built on the site and bravery awards to the hostages. WTF? Even a senior church member involved with a political party suggested the "men" that escaped and left the women behind certainly weren't worthy of any bravery award. Again, we have taken our eye off the ball, focusing on solidarity and group hugs and tears rather than the problem. Am I isolated from mainstream society by my thoughts? Most likely. Do I care? No, because it's obvious mainstream society has got it wrong.