mic351

Ya know, since they covered the one cam Grisha, if he was considerate at all, could f**king jack off on the side of the bed and not block the view of another cam. What wankers!!!

Bet you if they docked their wages they'd be more careful. And don't be an apologist for VH. they own the site. It's up to them to do something about it!

I'm not paying you people for covered cams!!!!

VH, when in the hell are you going to tell your participants TO QUIT COVERING THE DAM CAMS???!!!!

Best cam of the room and they covered it!!!

Girl could be eating a hamburger and she'd be entertaining to me... For awhile anyways...

Probably talking to Anna

He left.. Perhaps the cams scared him off or perhaps he'll be back.. who knows?

Congratulations Smith. You've just won the "Dickhead of the Week" Award!!

Later Mike. Take care....

Nah, someone would have bitched about it no matter what ya put on the end.....

K TY

Song could have been written for Nichole..

I like this one Mike..

Who said anything about anyone in here? Moreover, I don't believe you are from the states Dear and I think you got lost in the translation. What I said is a very common form of street slang; especially in Detroit where I am from...

While I don't think anyone at any of these apartments owes me a dam thing, nor do I feel I should be the object of their derision.. I am a paying customer and I am paying a substantial sum for entertainment. That being said, these are voyeur cam sites and even the purest of us expects to see some form of nudity and/or sex during a young lady's stay at an apartment I am helping to pay for. "Real Life" is not hiding under the covers, covering cams, showering in your underwear for God's sake, or going out every night, or constantly vacationing while you are staying at one of the apartments. I am wondering if there is a set of guidelines for the girls to read before they sign any agreement. Such "guidelines" would surely help them to understand what is expected of them. I know, I know.. "if I don't like it I don't have to look or subscribe". True enough but I really think the Webmasters at RLC should be a bit responsive to their customers and what they want to see. For instance, who are the most popular girls or apartments? I would venture to say: Irma, Belle, Masha and Sasha's, Oliva & Nick's, Tara & Bill, Linda & Tibor, Leora and Paul. Why do you think that is? Obviously, they are the most exhibitionist of the lot. Granted, a number of the girls in B1and B2 are gorgeous and have a loyal following but there is more bitching about these apartments also. I really believe that RLC is going to have to realize they are not the only game in town and they are going to have to be more responsive to their customers and what they want. they are also going to have to be a bit less arbitrary and capricious when it comes to banning customers. A banned customer is one that will constantly bad mouth you throughout the net. I might also suggest they perhaps participate in these forums a bit more than cruising them looking for people to ban. The time of being the only popcorn stand in town is over and other sites are fast catching up... Simply my 2 cents

Bitches be tripping!!!!!

In here most of the guys fuck their girls. But with Teya, she will fuck her guy! Lucky Stan...

BYTW VH; what ever happened to those new cams that were supposed to be in and set up for Maria and Grisha's place this week? Blowing smoke or are there actually new cams coming this year?

Hey VH, cams are still freezing and buffering in Misty's apartment..

Miscvoyeur you are probably right about RLC not caring abut their customers. If you are right then the 2nd half of my statement holds true. Now that there are other games in town, they will loose market share. It was a bifurcated statement and thus I believe it was accurate.

Thank you. And mine too

Yeah, right. And I'm Bill Gates....

I can see you want to get into a pissing match here. Generally when someone cannot come up with a valid response that's what they do. Ok, You the one that open the ball by bitching about his bitching. I responded and you, in an obvious "I'm rubber you're glue" response attempted to throw it back into my lap. You my friend are the one who told him if he didn't like to not watch it. You are the one who said RLC doesn't care about his $39 a month. But when someone responds and puts you on the carpet for your negative post you get all a twiterpatted. So I guess it's really all about you isn't it? And I probably will not respond because as of now, you are of no moment to me....

I own a small business and each and every one of my customers means something to me. So yes, I believe RLC very much cares abut every ones' $39 a month. If they don't they will eventually loose their market share to someone who does. From your post I have to believe you've been an employee all your life and not an employer. Because zeB1 doesn't like something he's supposed to be a sheep and toe your imaginary line? Ideas and growth are brought about by suggestion and dissention. Not by silence and compliance. If you don't like what he posts, put him on your ignore list and don't read him. Some of the rest of us may agree with him.. Moreover, unless you're the "posting police" or "thought police" or a mod for cc, he can pretty much bitch and scream all he wants. As can I by responding so eloquently to your verbose diatribe.