For once I agree with sr71gn. Just why am I supposed to take Alex and Linna's word over the participants? Obviously they have a vested interest in trying to explain the assolian way their "eviction thugs" handled running off Josh and Sylvia. Moreover, what would move Josh to even make the threat of stealing the cameras? If he even made such a threat. Could it be they got stiffed on their wages?. I have managed or owned businesses for over 40-years. Often threats are made to steal if wages are not properly paid. Gas stations used to be famous for that. Managers would say they read the pumps and they didn't match with the register. All the time the manager was pocketing the shortage taken out of the employee's wages. I'm not saying that definitively happened here. Conversely, I haven't heard Josh & Sylvia's side of the story either. Not knowing either party, I'd want to hear both sides before I make a judgement. Only judgement I can make right now is the thugs that threw them out are dickheads. The mangers are simple shits for endorsing that behavior. And VH has no idea what good public relations are by essentially staying mum on the subject and thus condoning such behavior also.
So no miscvoyeur, I don't understand why you would choose to take their word over anybody's. Just what makes you believe they wouldn't lie too?