Jump to content

waldi

Premium Member

Posts posted by waldi

  1. 2 minutes ago, rodox said:

     go to scott place archives of June and July 2020, mainly july 4th . that two months were at least for me months of true and real persecution for her naked and something more.  but until now anything sexual from her.  

    in other words, waste of time..😁

    • Haha 3
  2. 51 minutes ago, rodox said:

    i totally agree with you. only scott with Kim B could make me return the subscrpition by now. i didn like the look of these girls, there was very action but with a little staged too. i respect who likes but it still not the true voyeur for me.

    You can always climb a tree and spy on your neighbours;  loads of benefits, and you won't need to pay for subscription, Mr. true voyeur 🤣

    • Haha 5
  3. 36 minutes ago, Callypb said:

    Is there more or less stigma around sex workers in the Eastern culture? 

    With varying degrees sex workers are stigmatized in every country; just read bullshit comments of users who claims they are from West Europe, or any other so-called "developed" countries; their reasoning is often at the level of Neanderthals; tragedy;

    • Like 6
  4. 56 minutes ago, groomy said:

    I do not agree with your happy end.

    1) The apartment go to offline for 10+ hours on first day after the party and for all prime-time. The real fine (or rather the unearned Sadie profit) is $150-200.

    2) What is the reason? Operator's suspicions? How it works? Any apartment can be simply turned off. Someone coughed too loudly and end.

    And most importantly, what was the point of turning off the apartment? Why it not possible to conduct investigations in the background? Sadie could always go out into corridor, call on private topics without cameras. There was no any shock content. No dangerous risks. The alleged rapist, etc. There are no any complaints from subscribers. Moderators and admins could watch suspicious episode 100-times and have explanations from Sadie without turning off the apartment.

    Absolutely right; it was another example of vhtv incompetence; all the stories about suspicion of the rules' violation are ridiculous, and it undermines consumers trust! Speculations that operator or even a subscriber could know better than a girl whether her sexual encounter is consensual or not simply makes me laugh, unless we witness an evident attempted rape, what took place in vhtv only once, if I remember well; sometimes I think that most of the wiseacres here are people who never had a woman in bed;

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...