Epikouros

If you go far enough back in history, you could collectively blame any group or nation as a whole at a certain point in time. Including Americans. Just ask the Native Americans, among others. This is an alley without end... Let's just say Homo Sapiens as a species is capable of horrible things in the right, or rather the wrong, circumstances (such as manipulative dictator types with a big propaganda machine gaining power, or religious fanatics stirring people up, or...), as history so often shows. Nothing inherently makes Germans or Russians biologically or genetically more (or less) prone to cruelty than other humans. Those are external influences, and can change over time. In the next big conflict, it will be "all of them" of nation/group X (maybe yours, or mine,...) that will be the bad guys. "It is all of them", is exactly what Russians are now being spoonfed about "nazi satanic gay-loving" Ukrainians. Apparently you're thinking the same way, just the other way round. Do you still hate the Germans? They are now the country with the strongest anti-nazi laws on Earth. Germans (in general) are now much more allergic to nazi-style propaganda than - for example - Americans. Or Russians. You would get very cold, even hostile, reactions from most Germans (exceptions exist, as always) if you went there saying shit like "the nazis weren't all that bad". Things change. The victims of today can be the perpetrators of tomorrow, and vice versa. Every nation has dark pages in their history (or present, & probably future) not to be proud of (though they all have their portion of extremists & apologists who try to be anyway). Saying "it is all of them" (fill in enemy of your, or rather that of the manipulator behind the scenes, choice) is propaganda lesson 1.1. Saying "it is all of them" is a clear sign of ignorance, no matter who says it, against no matter which enemy. It's a manipulated frame of mind designed to make collective punishment of "the enemy" possible. That's how soldiers go as far as to mass execute civilians without their conscience bothering them (for now), as it's "all of them" and "they deserve it". It's called "demonizing the enemy" & it's an essential propaganda tool for making your people & soldiers ethnically cleanse the enemy population, for example. Saying "It is all of them" is also a slap in the face of all the Germans who resisted Hitler & died for it, and all the Russians who are currently being detained or otherwise in trouble, for opposing the war & their country turning into a dictatorship. As for those who keep silent, they're no heroes but it's how most humans act in comparable situations. Would you (or I) 1) be hero and resist & risk your life/freedom if a dictator came to power? Or 2) keep your head down? Or 3) support him wholeheartedly? Only one way to find out... In practice most humans pick the second of those three options, with the outliers choosing the first or the third. Option 2 is most common, though part of the people tend to gravitate (some for show, some out of belief) towards option 3 when a dictatorship is establishing itself / is on the rise, and towards option one (again, some out of pragmatism, others because their eyes opened) when a dictatorship starts unraveling (due to crises, such as suffering from war, famine, shortages,...) If it is "all of them", why were so many Germans (not even counting the Jewish Germans) arrested & often killed by their nazi government? Why are so many Russians becoming political prisoners and dying strange deaths the last few years or even longer? Surely there would be no Russian political prisoners & assassinations if it was "all of them"?... "Having been somewhere" is not valid as proof of how every single individual over there says, let alone thinks. Lots of people have been there, including foreign correspondents with no love for Putin, but talking to people off the record who are not happy with the direction their country is going (mostly younger people, the older generation tends to want to "make Russia great again" - generalizing here), but (understandably) afraid to publicly speak up. A lot also refuse to be interviewed out of fear. The only ones who aren't afraid to be recorded are Putin supporters or even bigger fanatics like Prigozhin fans - though the latter have had their "night of long knives" recently, too. Case in point, and back on topic: if it was "all of them", there is no way that Ukrainian & Russian RLC tenants could get along or even be able to live in the same house. Still, they clearly do.

Don't worry, it seems the cat helped itself to some meat on the kitchen counter. Or was it another cat? (didn't see it myself)

That's why they're fantastic animals. 😸

There are also Russians fleeing the Putin dictatorship (with good reason) ... And Russian RLC tenants have little reason to love Putler, as he outlawed RLC & similar sites several years ago. If his dictatorship becomes even more strict (& more efficient), Russian RLC tenants might even get in trouble for what they do on RLC when/if they get back home (& are identified). I'm thinking of charges like "promoting homosexuality" for lesbian or bisexual girls (Kristy, & other Russian girls who had sex with girls on cam). Or some form of treason or "extremism" for (suspected) criticism against the war, like sleeping in a room with a Ukrainian flag (Ari, if she's Russian?), or even just being friends with / supporting Ukrainian tenants who made pamphlets & even took part in a demonstration in Barcelona when the war broke out. There are pictures of that demonstration, and some people on those pictures might have been Russian tenants (not sure, but certainly on good terms with them on RLC). The only thing that might keep them from harm is possibly them being "not big enough fish" and/or inefficiency/ignorance of the government agents investigating dissenters. It seems the Ukrainian tenants bear less hatred towards their Russian colleagues than you do...

Not yet, perhaps. Or not with this guy. Maybe she wants to 'officially' break up with Vencel first.

Why shouldn't she be allowed, or be justified, to talk to other guys? Talking to other guys, even being friends with them, is not the same as dating them or having sex with them. Should a girl (or guy) stop talking to all her male (his female) friends & acquaintances?... Sounds very uptight to me... If Vencel had this kind of jealous reaction: way to go to push his girlfriend away from him. We can see the result now. Though probably the relationship was a sinking ship already...

Judging by a lot of comments: so is her boyfriend Timur, albeit another kind of douchebag apparently... At least he seems to prevent a lot of fun from happening, as I heard through the grapevine... But I don't know/haven't watched either guy often enough to be able to judge.

Possibly. I missed the moment when Wolf needed the injection, I just saw Rachel giving him a butt injection in the bathroom. Whatever it is, we might consider the possibility that Rachel is a trained nurse? Theoretically anyone can give an injection of course, although if an untrained person does it, it would be more painful. Where I live, only trained persons are allowed to give injections. Though there may be exceptions for emergencies. Family members of patients, or the patients themselves could learn how to give an injection, for example. Or it's an Episode in Northguy's spy show, where both Ukrainian & Russian spies somehow ended up in the same voyeur villa in Barcelona. Isn't Rachel Ukrainian? Giving the Russian Wolf a taste of his own secret service's Polonium?... 😄

What's Rachel injecting in Wolf's butt cheek? Insuline or something? Maybe she's a trained nurse?...

Or rather 100 % non-subscriber at the moment? Edit: nevermind, he answered confirmative himself.

You're totally right. And still some people call you a RLC shill... 🙄

About Esmi & Nadia sunbathing naked/topless on the balcony (of course I missed it): maybe the neigbour(s) in question is/are all female & without boyfriend/husband? Or visibly gay? But probably the girls were just sure they weren't home... Still, I wouldn't mind as a neighbour 😉 but surely wouldn't harass them or make silly remarks if they did that. I might water my balcony plants a bit longer than necessary, possibly drowning them in the process, but alas this alone would probably cause them to quickly cover up... Even just being on my balcony could suffice. All because of the existence of some few douchebag guys who wouldn't be able to handle themselves at the sight of a topless or naked girl/woman... 😕 So girls get conditioned at an early age to cover up when males are about... They would be way less prude if (almost) all men could actually act normal in the presence of naked girls. Obviously rude/lecherous guys is why we (most civilized guys with a possible voyeuristic streak) can't have good things...

Maybe not, but I knew the kind of reactions that would come. One already did. And there's actually no reason not to smoke weed on the balcony over there. There'd be no consequences. Only reason I could think of is that perhaps too much smoke (whether weed or tobacco, or both) would blow into her room. Or there's simply no real reason at all.

Who cares if they smoke simple tobacco or some weed? Or the place were they do it (or not)? It's tolerated in Spain anyway. People (especially when younger) smoke weed in the open, too. Certainly in parks, on balconies etc. And not just in Spain, but pretty much all over Europe that is not a provincial small village (& even then). Since the late 1960s/70s, & more widespread since the early 1990s. And guess what: society didn't collapse. Some people need to stop pearl clutching over this actually rather common phenomenon. I'm not sure about you, but some people on here are apt to start a howling & shaming choir over this. Again.

Because it's more fun this way?

I was never a subscriber, or maybe only a month or so close to two decades ago, but now & then you see a vid with the news of months or years ago on some porn video sites. The name Victoria Sinclair rings a faint bell, though. Lily Kwan, too, if I remember her name well. Asian, or at least Asian roots. Still a fun concept though, and the journalism, reporting & presenting quality was (is?) actually not bad, certainly on par or better than most American media. It's a Canadian company I believe. Some/most of the presenters had had a bit too much surgery for my taste, though. Don't know how things are nowadays. I also preferred younger journalists then they had, but maybe the quality of journalism/presenting would have suffered then, because of inexperience.

From some angles, those buttplugs cover more than some panties... Edit: damn, did Ulyana read this forum? I didn't mean she should put on panties like she just did... 😕

Went back to adjust her outfit to the pantyless & buttplugged dresscode? But this is more hope than good sense talking...

You mean they had sex already?... I thought Lacrim didn't score with any of the BCL girls yet... Except his own guest gf, of which I don't know if she's still around...

Lacrim & his pal positioned for a good view (Fior less so, guess he's used to something, working for RLC). You'd really start to think he won some subscriber contest to be allowed in the project or something. 😄 Because, to be fair, most of us would also be positioned like this if given the chance. Edit: seems the party is over. Maybe they had just a bit too much of a good pantyless/buttplug upskirt look. I think the whole pantyless buttplug thing was all a ruse by the girls to find a reason to kick them out early! 😉

I had to check, but it is.

Naked News at least, I presume?

Was she? When? & especially: why?

I'm not watching karaoke unless/until the girls take their clothes off. I hate karaoke: it's almost always bad songs anyway, made even worse by (drunk) amateur singers. So I guess I'm staying with the teasing butt plug party for now. Though the end of both parties will probably be equally eventless. Still prepared to be proven wrong though.

I think it's somewhat funny to see how they tease those guys. Especially Harley at the moment.