Jump to content

philo

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,914

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Points

    13,005 [ Donate ]

 Content Type 

Everything posted by philo

  1. philo
    Another way of understanding my questions is to ask who is the intended audience or beneficiary of the significance of that gesture?
  2. philo
    Short sheeting can be observed by watching on Replay as Shantal makes the bed. She used the two bed sheets to fold vertically, physically separating the bed into two distinct areas (i.e. short) rather than the full length and width of the sheet to cover the entire bed. Shantal's actions were observably deliberate. So, my question of "benefit" asked whether Shantal was intending to send the demarkation message to us, the viewer, or to the guest?
  3. philo
    I'm also having difficulty determining what the relationship between Shantal and her guest might be from the visual cues. Clearly they have some past history together but it does not appear to be an exceptionally close relationship. Maybe others have seen things, but I have seen nothing to indicate "closeness": no hugging, touching...not even much eye contact from the guest toward Shantal?
  4. philo
    I just watch as Shantal made up the bed after sleeping there with her guest. She very deliberately short sheeted the bed vertically. (Some of you will know that short sheeting is). It seems odd to do that unless to make a clear demarkation of personal space. I don't understand if Shantal was doing that for her benefit or for ours?
  5. philo
    I wonder if RLC is still running the feed to the replay for B-1? Maybe we can see what is happening later?
  6. philo
    Has B-1 gone UM?
  7. philo
    Thank you for that correction as well. I thought that Gina had fucked them both but did not want to make the assertion because I was never able to tell them apart. LOL
  8. philo
    Thanks for the additional correction. I did, however, see Esmi reach under Kristy's skirt and touch her pussy while they were on the sofa in the living room. That, however could only be considered as sex play.
  9. philo
    Although one of the twins technically did not have sex. on camera, she did lay on top of Gina while Gina fucked her twin sister with a dildo.
  10. philo
    Correction: I believe that one of the twins never had sex on camera. Otherwise, the track record of continuous sexual activity in B-1 is what creates the expectation for sexual activity among subscribers and is basis of what makes me think what I think.
  11. philo
    I have watched everyone who has slept in Shantal's current bed since Nora and Kiko and cannot think of anyone who did not eventually have sex on camera.
  12. philo
    I don't think that many people would go through the trouble of getting vetted to appear on an internet sex platform like RLC in order to re-unite with their playmates from grade school. They can make content to display their friendship to the world from a You Tube platform with much less hassle. While I have learned that there are many different reasons why people pay a subscription to RLC, at least some of us have the expectation of seeing sexual content.
  13. philo
    I'm starting to believe that Shantal's guest may just be a good buddy and not at all a sexual partner. The girl may have an extraordinary mind or she may be extremely trustworthy and is bonded with Shantal in that way. I can detect nothing at all that I find sexually appealing about her...nothing!
  14. philo
    Shantel's girlfriend has arrived?
  15. philo
    I don't think that Leora has changed much at all. I have watched her in three different apartments and the only change that I have seen is when she changed her on-camera shows and took a girl to her bed for ratings. Then she attempted to take another before fate stepped in. If that scenario had succeeded it is likely that we would have never seen Paul again. I wish that those who think that Leora has changed would simply describe just exactly what has changed? The fact that a new colored dildo shows up from time to time is not change!
  16. philo
    I respect the perspectives of all those on the forum who have theorized that Leora's only anal adventures have been with her toys rather than with an actual lover. However, my personal training and experiences have conditioned me to believe that sexual fantasy is grounded in some earlier life experience...so I believe that the fantasy is an effort to recreate a feeling from an actual earlier event. Also, I believe that Leora's choice of dildos are not random in my opinion. Whether she chooses one size or color over another for a bate session may be based upon her memories rather than her projections. The decisions she makes in choosing Mr. Pink over Mr. Black for any particular bate session could be based upon her desire to recreate an earlier experience just as much as it could be something desired. My perspective on this issue is not evidence based. I have nothing to support my differing opinion from others than my personal life experiences, some study of human behavior and a limited understanding of the science on the subject. I do know that the terms we use to describe what we see Leora due are biased by our own perceptions, and our understanding is therefore define by whatever meaning we ascribe to her behavior. For example, some will see a Leora anal bate session and believe she is fantasizing. They may define fantasy as envisioning what desired but is impossible or improbable. Others may believe it is a misplaced description of what Leora is really doing...The may believe that Leora is envisioning, which is more the visualization of an actual future possibility. There is one other possibility that can be supposed, and used to ascribe our individual meaning to what we see. Leora's use of the dildo in her ass may actually be....recollection! That assumption has the same weight as any other assertion that I have heard here on this forum. Until we hear it directly from Leora, we will never know.
  17. philo
    Watching her makes me wonder who was the first to take her ass that way? I wish that she could feel supported enough to bring that kind of action to her life again.
  18. philo
    I was referring to the actor who played the young Adonis in the film.
  19. philo
    Could the character Adonis in the movie Creed III be Shantal's little brother? Family resemblances are hard to ignore. Except for his apparent younger age, they might have been twins?
  20. philo
    I also fail to see the appeal in this apartment as currently being revealed. There has not been anything of any sexual significance since the Nelly affair other than the same bed sex night with another couple. The fact that that sex session is not widely discussed or even remembered, is evidence of a single minded narrative that is not really worth following any more. Where is the curiosity about how that soft-swing session happened? Where is the speculation about how they met the couple, how Alberto got to agree to participate and what might be their ongoing relationship with the couple?
  21. philo
    Many of the people who post here regularly have claimed repeatedly that Martina's brother is gay. They have also reported that nothing sexual could be going on between Martina and one of her male friends and the reason stated is because her friend is also gay (according to them) . Now we see Martina's brother with a girlfriend and he is fucking her regularly. Can someone please explain if Martina has more than one brother?
  22. philo
    What life experience happens to someone like Alberto, that causes him to lose all sense of self worth, self respect, and manhood, and that allows him to remain in a situation such as he finds himself in with Martina?
  23. philo
    I am please to see.the progress we have made with respect to Big Guy: From "it did not happen" to "maybe something happened but it does not mean anything because she does that with everyone". Maybe next time there will be more on camera activities to discuss since Alberto seems to be totally disregarded now. Pease Out.
  24. philo
    The arguments cannot refuse to account for what is obvious. Did we or did we not see Big Guy in bed with Martina and rub her ass before they pulled up the covers? Is that a type of sexual touching? If it is non-sexual touching, then would he do that in front of Alberto? If not, why not? On the other hand, If Martina does allow Big Guy to touch her, it does not mean that they are about to become engaged or have a "relationship". There have been several friends who have stayed overnight at Martina's apartment. What is the criteria for who gets to sleep in the guest room and who gets to sleep with her in the bed? We have heard the explanation of that's just how Martina is with her friends. Really? Why is Big Guy the only man to sleep with her in the same bed other than Alberto? I think that people will do what they are accustomed to doing and what they have permission to do. That should not be such a difficult concept to understand.
  25. philo
    It seems that two people can see the same scene and come away with different ideas about what they saw. (Where did we learn that before? LOL). One person can see his spouse come out of the bathroom with a guy and say "oh, that's just Johnny, they went to school together since forth grade and she never pays him any attention". While another person would say" WTF are they in the bathroom together for 15 minutes? Both of these ideas about what went on in the bathroom comes from their imagination...BOTH!
×
×
  • Create New...