Barry Elephant

6 minutes ago, scutus said:

Now this is the " BARRY ELEPHANT FORUM " take it to the rant and rave section if you wish to continue this discussion.

oh dear, you seem to have lost the thread. I get it that you think you are ranting and raving, but you go ahead, I am ok here, thanks.  Have a good one, anyway.

21 minutes ago, scutus said:

But did you see the actions I referred to ?

I used the word "rules " in the same context you did. " you might want to calm down a bit mate".

I think you have got all you are going to get out of the quote you are overusing.

I am familiar with the "two wrongs make a right" school of thought in its various forms. Ta.

Just now, scutus said:

March 10 2017  ( Leora deletes her account )

Barry Elephant said " calm down a bit mate "

Perhaps you sir, condone the slapping by an adult male to a female, or a pet in anger !

I do not !      Nor does that behavior deserve respect.  Granted Paul has not grabbed Leora by the neck, and was forcibly lifting her, as he did in the hallway of the old apartment. But just recently swung at Leora's head, but pulled back enough to hit her hair. AND, slapping a dog because it is barking is not the way to treat a pet that shows you unconditional love.

You are entitled to your opinion, as stated in the "rules" . As I am entitled to mine.

There have been RLC apartments closed because of violence by the " male " tenant. I, for one do not wish to see this happen to this apartment.

Perhaps, if our comments are read, then maybe an attempt to nullify the adverse actions would be made, before RLC has to close it because of abuse.

Have a good day.

I don't see much signs of abuse here. Sometimes couples fight, sometimes they each do things that they later regret.

I don't know why you scare-quote the word "rules". Our interactions here are governed by rules. We follow them, otherwise we aren't welcome here, as I understand it.

You might want to calm down a bit mate.

10 hours ago, ApeApeMan said:

I didn't intend to get political. I was just under the impression that different opinions were welcome here. I don't see how one can say "I'm Right and you're wrong" I know the difference from an opinion and a fact. I would never be so rude to say you are wrong and I'm right. Long story short I found the Ignore button. Now IMO All opinions are welcome again.

how about "in my opinion I am right and you are wrong"?

;o)

8 minutes ago, RAIMOND said:

Le respecter pourquoi?

Un type qui est capable de lever la main sur sa femme ne mérite aucun respect

Sans parler du fait qu'il n'est meme pas capable de débarassser son assiette ou de faire un minimum de ménage.

Le respect, ça se gagne et lui il en est loin 

It is a requirement of the rules of the site

google translation:

C'est une exigence des règles du site

6 minutes ago, Pepe said:

No sir I don't think you breached anything just thought you should read it all.... Let's agree to disagree and move on as not to clutter up things anymore. 

With you pepe. I normally enjoy just reading your comments, I certainly wasn't baiting you when I disagreed with the general slagging-off that Paul has to silently endure from all and sundry. Have a good day / evening / whatever it is wherever you are

1 minute ago, Pepe said:

Maybe you should read all of it.

) Do not flame-bait, flame, or attack other member’s comments or tenants actions without explaining yourself. Treat others and their Comments and/or Quotes with respect. Especially in the RLC, Camarads, VHTV, And VV Apartment and Old Dudes threads, treat other members and tenants with respect. It is fine to disagree with another's opinion or to critique the action of the tenants, but do so in constructive ways using socially acceptable language. Do not be an annoyance, or members will file reports against you, and Mods will be irritated and will ban you.

can you point out where I breached it?

you asked me to tell you why you should show the guy respect, so I did. I am treating you with respect. I don't know what has caused me to inflame your scent glands like I seem, to have done, but I hope that my critique was constructive and that I used socially acceptable language. I certainly intended that to be the case.

5 minutes ago, Pepe said:

Your point?  Prove to me that I should respect him 

well...there is this from the global rules

Especially in the RLC, Camarads, VHTV, And VV Apartment and Old Dudes threads, treat other members and tenants with respect.

Just now, Pepe said:

Again nothing has been said that's not true 

your point?

Just now, Pepe said:

Your point? 

you made it for me

Just now, Pepe said:

He's a piece of shit and does not deserve any respect 

that's precisely what we mean

thanks

Just now, Pepe said:

He said no said anything bad him other than what we see...  

the guy is slated regularly here. I gave a few quotes shat show it, but he is constantly disrespected

8 minutes ago, esanders9863 said:

On many occasions I have said time after time she loves Paul but are we at a point where we have to walk on eggshells just to make comments around here now

the only risk you face is someone disagreeing with you. You don't have to "walk on eggshells" that is being over dramatic

21 minutes ago, esanders9863 said:

 Well good for you Sherlock Holmes

it didn't require any deductive skill. I just read the topic. And there it was.  People not saying anything bad about him, apparently.

On ‎2‎/‎2‎/‎2019 at 9:11 AM, moos54 said:

she's not Emily 

She's Sonya 

good to see someone helping a fellow forum member out - at last!

3 hours ago, just man said:

Well, I 'll start of the last points which you said it, it's unnatural if claimed to solve the problem of world hunger or drugs or any disaster's has been occurred or  will occurring in that a world  on these forums,even if i had objections about any disaster, i would go to on the place his, for discussion it ..with Knowing that All these problems has begun a tiny and then getting bigger and bigger (such as water leakage from the roof of the house),all these problems doesn't have been solved at his time & have been ignored it and have been placed in the files of  the drawers of the archive.
 but, i wouldn't came here to that thread unless if the CC has opened the mini UN security council on the videos topics.
about the problem of video's or content's that's which we all know that it belongs to the one owner is RLC,he's the owner of all copyright & he's has right to demanding for it,we all are agreeing till this point,even if had were used like a coverage to supporting  over and over to somebody..

As for the sites as you mentioned i had did visited to some of them at several times and found some videos that have already had been taken from here and been posted on their sites, but there is a big big difference on that it ,i had noticed on that, they don't remove the watermark of those videos,whether if it belonging to the owner RLC or watermark to those who recorded it and posted it here or somewhere else,like some of the videos  i or Hope85 or Mittsy or godfather Haword has did posted here...
for example take this link:

,and came to here and posted all of links which related of that videos as like if he is the one who has recorded and he's the one who has taken an risk like as the banning, block off, and stalking on

"risk"

lol

you are downloading porn. there is no need to get carried away and take it all so seriously

16 minutes ago, esanders9863 said:

As you have read through our comments you can clearly see we have said absolutely nothing bad about Paul but only what our eyes are seeing and of course I will never ever want to see him have sex and that will never ever change and that would never change how I feel about our princess

Really? I found these quotes, in this topic, without really looking or translating the French and Italian:

Paul really needs someone to kick the ever loving shit out of him

On the rare occasions I have mistakenly watched [paul and leora] I usually end up throwing up a little bit in my mouth. 

I would rather pluck out my eyes before I go through that trauma

heaven help him should we ever meet face to face

hopefully she's trying to convince him to leave 

is naiger okay? should we be worried?

18 hours ago, akaanon2 said:

Regardless of the "banner" we should respect the efforts of Hope/Mittsy etc who do most of the unpaid work to keep us supplied with quality uploads. Stick with cc as the mentioned sites source most of their rlc material from cc anywa

That's true. But CC is full of pages of 'quoted' photographs requesting reuploads. It obscures fresh content on the site, and is evidence that there is an unmet demand.

This would be a good time to say cheers to the lads you mention, hope and mittsy. Nice one boys.

On ‎1‎/‎30‎/‎2019 at 2:54 AM, moreau said:

sous prétexte que Éva soit belle et séduisante tu lui trouves toutes les excuses ....mais c ' est une calamité pour entretenir son appartement ....quasiment en permanence la vaisselle traîne dans l ' évier la nourriture n ' est jamais mise au frais le lit n ' est pas fait elle sort le linge de la machine à laver elle le laisse dans un baquet sans l ' étendre..........alors si tu me traites de crétin et d ' imbécile quand j ' écris que c ' est  une paresseuse je pense que nous n ' avons pas la conception de la femme idéale ....être femme c ' est un ensemble il n ' y a pas que le physique ....avec les années la sensualité va disparaître mais la paresse restera 

on the pretext that Éva is beautiful and seductive you find him all the excuses .... but it is a calamity to maintain his apartment .... almost constantly the dishes drag in the sink food is never put fresh the bed is not made it leaves the laundry of the machine to wash it leaves it in a bucket without extending .......... so if you treat me stupid and fool when j write that it is a lazy I think we do not have the ideal woman's conception .... to be a woman it is a whole there is not only the physical .... with the years the sensuality will disappear but laziness will remain

does anybody else watch RLC to critique the tenants housework?

I know I don't!

On ‎1‎/‎24‎/‎2019 at 8:39 AM, Yalche said:

your reply is not honest.

The issue is not there

There is no issue. The internet is a huge place. If you don't like pornlink's site, don't visit it. It's not an "issue" until you make it so.

On ‎1‎/‎29‎/‎2019 at 6:21 PM, Helderwelder2 said:

I agree with that;

pornlink post`s only videos from other sides or members

....and deface these videos with his banner "Hotscopes", just like yesterday on Leora's back.

i would suggest doing it like me, avoid those videos.
In addition, there is the same (without additional banner ads) of Hope85 or Mittsy1 especially in vile better quality.

NO; Pornlink !!!!

this sort of stuff is all over the site at the moment. I don't understand the fuss

12 hours ago, Helderwelder2 said:

what more could you want ..... no banner on Leora's back !!!!

 

Why so much fuss? Be calm. I am pretty sure that the banner is just placed on the screen, then leora moves around on the screen and sometimes her back is beneath the banner, and it appears to be on her back.

I am certain that pornlink hasn't tattoed anything onto Leora

12 minutes ago, miscvoyeur said:

What a completely idiotic post.

 

Posts like that often tell us more about the poster than the subject of the post

17 hours ago, Yalche said:

yes pornlink only wants to make money

His problem is not what want or think the forumers on this site and respect is an unknown word for him. RLC is nothing for him. Camcaps is only a potential source of customers.

He is like a business man and he is here simply to get some customers for his site thanks to the job of others, unscrupulous.

Do what you want with his site but don't be naive with his motivation.

calm down people. RLC are in it for money. Camcaps are in it for money. and what?