budda

It never happened to me to play cards with an avversary like that...

None of us knows exactly what the tenant payment process is. What I wrote was used only to demonstrate how a "dead apartment" can generate high views. The revenue count - then - can be right or wrong. Some of you - long ago - had pointed out how the "strange story" between Em and Sid (without sex) generated more attention than the one between Lisa & Grant who had sex every day. Have a nice day

Yesterday morning I started to follow - hour by hour - the views in the apartment of Em & Sid until same hour of this morning. The result is shown in the table below. It is important to consider that: · There were no sexual activities throughout all the day. · There were no exciting moments throughout all the day. · The apartment has been empty for 5 consecutive hours. This "dead apartment" has totaled almost 5,000 views anyway ! In the following table, I hypothesized the net gain of Em & Sid (from which rental costs and utilities must be deducted). Monthly revenues are very important and, if we consider some possible sexual activities or exciting moments, they could even double. This confirms my thesis that Em & Sid have a business agreement: Not regular sexual between us but just a few kisses or caresses to keep Voyeurs' attention high - We are a "money machine" even if we do nothing.

A good way to watch TV.

Relax, relax, relax.

A bit of gymnastics before going sleeping ...

Welcome on board !

Em got so sexy for Sid or why did she have to go out ?

With the cameras positioned in this way you can not see anything !

WOW !!

Sorry Aladin but my $ 1,3 must divided between all the apartments I look at. Nobody looks at a single apartment all day.

Thanks my friend !

I need to be educated on how you could see the views of Em at 3:45 and then those at 11:45. Many thanks.

So how do other apartments with lower visibility survive? The only possibility is that VHTV has a very high number of subscribers.

Many thanks for your clarification Groomy. I believe that in this case it should be considered the "law of large numbers". Even a very small amount, if multiplied by a high number of views, can give interesting figures, I do not know if the Coffee94 table is realistic. If it is, Em had 385 views in just one hour. This means - if we consider 15/16 hours of views a day - about 6,000 views per day. Even a few cents, multiplied by these numbers, give important figures (and Em does little sex ...).

It's just an hypothesis ...

I suppose it is a gross revenue from which all expenses must be deducted

Thanks. I will immediately send a ticket to WHYV support.

Is there anyone who has problems with the camera # 7 in this apartment ?

Now it is 6 pm and, as expected, Em has not returned home. VHTV had announced her return for Sunday evening or - at the latest - Monday; if there had been transport problems ...

Would any of you sleep ?

An empty house does not always mean no money. See the example of Em !

Not yet. As many of us had supposed, perhaps we will not even see hertoday. It's too good for her to stay away from home ... eh, eh, eh.

I followed your green arrow but I see - for example - 1850 response or 2150 response. How can I turn them into the number of views? How did you get the number of 385 views of Em? Thank you

I'm sorry. Where exactly you may read the number of visualization ?