Jump to content

Alladino

Members
  • Posts

    6,634
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1
  • Points

    2,005 [ Donate ]

Everything posted by Alladino

  1. Considering the GOV apartments, it is the concept and not the location or Covid-19 that is problematic. RLC moved the girls out of their actual home and let them perform silly shows instead of actually providing an insight into their private lives. Especially the idea to have only girls in an apartment as big as B4 is really stupid. Two or three decent guys, who could be of real interest for the girls, would have enabled a lot here. In any case it is important to let these shows go. They prevent any realistic development. Especially all these pseudo lesbian shows are completely unrealistic. RLC was once more than just porn. Take the parties as an example. All that GOV achieves here is meat inspection tailored to the camera. In the other apartments there were often more realistic parties with real guests who just had a good time without trying to put on a show for the camera. When Things really went further than 1st base, it usually happened separated from the other visitors. These were then often exciting developments where you could really see more than usual. BTW, These regulations on privacy exist in almost every country and certainly also in Russia. The difference there lies more in the laws that allows the government to monitor its citizens. Again, it is the cocept of the GOV that is not working.
  2. Of course I interpret. For this I also used my knowledge from the past about B4. I have also described it accordingly. One thing is strange. RLC has installed over 40 cameras in this house, but has left out all the favourite places of the residents for parties.Maybe that's why these places are so popular, because there are no cameras.
  3. I used the words of @ed2 : I think he is a critical thinker but certainly fair and reasonable. We are certainly not always of one opinion and he makes that clear, but always fair. BTW, It's not that I have no idea what these words mean in the context of GOV. It's not the first pseudo party the girls from RLC have pulled off. I don't know if they were already dancing on the tables and if they had already lost some of their clothes, but we all know that both would have happend if they would not had the interruption. That is always there problem with RLC in B4. The really exciting part seems to have happened off camera again. For the camera there is only to see what the girls think the audience would like to see. The whole Thing normaly looks more like a strip club than a real party. The exciting part is the interaction between the participants. Usually including the approchement between the sexes. That is missing in GOV. B4 parties in camera view are anything else than realistic.
  4. I used the words of someone else in this forum because i did not saw the event.
  5. @moos54 As I understood it, many of the residents were already off camera for a long time before the event in question.Almost like there were two parties. One in the living room with silly dance show for the camera and one off camera with all the action. That RLC then has gone UM to not show the violence, is fine. I guess. Strange is just how long it all took. What remains is that this was probably the most exciting evening since months and there was almost nothing to see. Typical RLC. REAL LIFE off camera.
  6. I think that summarises this event best. B4 is best when it is in UM. 😂
  7. The real question is which of the Girls RLC had intended for the now unavailable guest. 😉🤣
  8. Imagine if he was actually the owner and now he cancels the contract. B4 would finally be finished. 😉🤣
  9. I think by the time the apartment gone in UM the fun was already over. Now it is just a matter of not showing how the residents react to the event, which should very well be included.
  10. Well, the idea is to be able to see the real life with the camera. The way I understood it, most of all happened off camera. First the party itself and then the end of the Party. One of the Girls even cover a camera to do so. The followed by the ever popular UM game. 🤣
  11. Self defence is fine, but even here really only self-defense. One should not let it turn into a fight.
  12. No idea what happened. That was just a basic remark on my part.
  13. No, they had the right to defend themselves. If he did not not attack them they may ask him to leave and could call the Police to enforce this.
  14. It sounded like you had control of the cameras and he ask you to start them again.
  15. I guess the whole thing was more of an off camera Party.
  16. Then we can only hope that it turns out positively and B4 has to be closed. 😉😂
  17. Well, B4 UM fits better, the party took place more off camera anyway. 🤣
  18. Silly dancing Show in the living room, real life off camera. 🤣
×
×
  • Create New...