Jump to content
*** New Software Coming Soon! Please Check for Important Information in the Read Me Section ***

Alladino

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,415

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

  • Points

    1,230 [ Donate ]

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Alladino

  1. Alladino
    Just holding a lot of press conferences is useless if they are of poor quality. Trump has spent far too much time playing down the problem or looking for someone else to blame. Sure, Later the quality of these events improved strongly by having experts like Dr. Fauci speak. Only, with someone like Trump, there is always a lot of confusion and misinformation. The only advantage of Trump's presence here is probably that certain groups of the population have more confidence in him than in science. A sad, but probably realistic observation.
  2. Alladino
    Yeah, I'm sorry. I'm just really upset about Trump.
  3. Alladino
    Already answered:
  4. Alladino
    Then you're wrong, a doctor can be an expert, but he doesn't have to be. Even the observation of a positive result does not automatically make him an expert, since, as already mentioned, most Covid-19 cases result positive. Systematic studies provide an objective view. That is why they are so important.
  5. Alladino
    The important thing is that not all participants need treatment. It may be that for people with mild syntoms, the danger from the drug is greater than the disease itself. Of course, when things become critical and no other option is available, alternatives will be used. But this already happens world wide without Trump needed so say a word about it. I do not understand why these decisions cannot be left to the experts. Why does Trump have to get involved in these things?
  6. Alladino
    Do you know why medical studies are ideally conducted in a double-blind procedure?
  7. Alladino
    Do you really compare the scientific methods of modern times with the predominantly religious dominated area of the middle ages?!? Don't you realize how stupid this comparison is? Where does this deep skepticism towards science or knowledge comes from? What makes you trust a person like Trump more than someone who has been dealing with this kind of topic all their life in an scientific manner? Without these experts there would be no hydroxychloroquine.
  8. Alladino
    Well, the girls still need time off camera to get orders for the next shows. 😂
  9. Alladino
    This bullshit about Trump versus establishment really pisses me off. Trump, even as president of the USA, is in no way able to evaluate the effectiveness or usefulness of a drug. That's what experts do. There is no reason for a politician to advocate the use of a drug. That is what doctors do and they rely on the recommendations of experts. The task of the news channels is to report on all this. Including the unprofessional conduct of Trump. What makes me so angry about Trump's approach is that it will lead to people asking for medication they do not need. It is the task of the doctor to prescribe medication. Trump should have just kept his mouth shut here.
  10. Alladino
    I think the studies are still ongoing. More participants, statisticly improved results. If it is such a success, we will certainly find out soon.
  11. Alladino
    Nice to see that this lawmaker is feeling better again, but unfortunately this is no proof of the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine at all. It could have been that she would have shown improvement also with a placebo. Anyway, I looked a little further. My information might have been a little out of date: Let's see what other studies will show as result.
  12. Alladino
    No one is against using this drug. On the contrary, I think there are over 10 studies in progress. Still, it is very important to know that it actually helps. Especially since these drugs also have side effects, which, if there are no positive effects, only cause harm. I don't know what source you're basing your assumption on. However, there is a fairly well-known study that I suspect. This study has some very strong weaknesses: If you have another source, I would like to have a look. I agree with you on one thing. Sometimes it's necessary to take shortcuts. This is already being done (e.g. in the development of a vaccine). However, the whole thing must always be carefully assessed and reasonable. Simply being fast no matter what can end up doing more harm than good.
  13. Alladino
    If you believe in this bullshit, you are obviously a conspiracy theorist or at least falls for them. Especially considering the extreme countermeasures being taken worldwide to protect this risk Groups, is it silly to assume that there is a hidden goal against them. The problem with conspiracy theorist is that they interpret statements out of context or completely misinterpret them and then have the audacity to claim that a hidden intention was inadvertently revealed. Fauci did not accidentally reveal a future outbreak. He has only made a statement based on statistics and science that this outbreak will almost certainly occur. Assessing these risks and advising on them is precisely his job.
  14. Alladino
    CNN has reported on hydroxychloroquine already on 19.03. with a clear and unambiguous Statement by Dr. Fauci. The statement might not be what you wanted to hear, but corresponds to the statements of the majority of experts. For the time being, the aim is to produce meaningful studies. If the drug really proves to be helpful, it will be important in the future to give it to the participants who really need it.
  15. Alladino
    Wash your hands with soap for 20-30 seconds and the problem is solved. There is never a 100% certainty, but alsp no use to overdo it.
  16. Alladino
    At the moment, we do not know when (here in Germany) we will start to reopen. Currently, we are importing patients from other countries, which I consider to be a sign that there is some hope that the hospitals will not exceed their limits. The economic consequences for 2020 will be dramatic. However, I think many things will return to normal as mid 2021. It is not a war and the structures are all still there, only the engine has stalled.
  17. Alladino
    The question is only what belongs in which category. It is quite possible that none of the girls in GOV really masturbates on their own initiative, but only for payment. It could even be that some of the girls do not even truly masturbate, but only pretend to do it. I wouldn't call myself naive. I just take into account that in apartments where girls dance on tables and work on each other with dildos, a lot of content may just be superficial shows.
  18. Alladino
    In the past it often seemed to me as if RLC tried to perform at least one somewhat more extreme event once a month in GOV. In general, I don't think it makes much sense to believe that all these shows are based on some kind of sexual drive. Much more likely it is just money.
  19. Alladino
    Maybe. Anyway, please also keep in mind that women can fake orgasms. This is perhaps the most important point to understand. Squirting is no proof of an orgasm. Otherwise no woman could pee without first reaching climax. 😅 At the latest when the girls started to perform silly porn shows on the dining table, you should consider that there is something wrong with GOV.
  20. Alladino
    Yes that's right. I think there is a certain pattern in the GOV Apartments that I like to describe as shows for the camera. That now suddenly more and more girls seems to be unable to hold their water could be a coincidence, or just mean that RLC started to pay the girls for this show element now.
  21. Alladino
    The point is that female ejaculate is not discharged in large quantities. The articl obove Mention this like: This is really something for the laboratory and most likely cannot be seen on the wide angle cameras from RLC. BTW, Nobody said that Squirting can not happen during orgasm. The artical obove mention this like: Anyway, still, the fact is that squirting is mostly pee.
  22. Alladino
    You should really learn to read and not only to have prejudices. Is Female Ejaculation Just Urine? | The Sex MD WWW.THESEXMD.COM If you were to ask most people to describe female ejaculation, they would probably describe what is most often seen in porn and adult magazines—a...
  23. Alladino
    Squirt, as the large amount of fluid that is so popular in porn movies, is mostly pee. Very rarely there is also female ejaculation, with very little fluid (more similar to male sperm but without semen): Female ejaculation comes in two forms, scientists find | New Scientist WWW.NEWSCIENTIST.COM Sometimes referred to as squirting, and banned in UK porn, no one knew what the fluid some women produce at orgasm was composed of until now Anyway, everything you will see on RLC in the porn shows is probably mostly pee.
  24. Alladino
    Now suddenly all the girls start peeing everywhere. It seems someone at RLC has extended the bonus catalogue. 😣
  25. Alladino
    I'm curious if this is really the start of a product development that will be used later or if it's just a marketing event.
×
×
  • Create New...