SierraTM

Amira is beautiful, I suspect she did something to her face after her first visit which kinda makes her look weird. She isn't looking like this on her first visit, iirc. But she is okay for me. Lets hope she would be more active this stint.

Pam, one of the nicest & easiest to get-along girls from this project

Yep they will only respond when the subscriptions drop massively. If not, they just hope you would fuck off & they continue to collect $$$.

I find it weird, perhaps he did not make her cum in the laundry room. But anyway, this is bullshit. Fucking real life cam = fucking in the laundry room where they have their own room.

She isn't one of my fav girls but no doubt she contributed to the project. For the subscribers, the only thing that should matter is whether the girls contributed in return for what we paid RLC. All other talks/discussions about 'what is' or 'what is not' are rubbish. We don't fucking pay RLC so that we can see if Esmi wear or did not wear pants today & hope for the fucking best 😏

So my thoughts are someone from RLC really like them & is keeping both of them here for a reason (more likely). Or they actually fulfill RLC's agendas elsewhere off-cam (less likely).

Yes, I am thinking about this too. If this goes on, my subscription is on its last legs. RLC is giving very bad value to its subscribers and this will only continue.

And fuck the sisters are still here... Either someone at RLC like them very much or they do the work for RLC offcam. Either way the subscribers lose out.

Well last I heard not just the women are into men nowadays 😏

Thanks! Apt name for him too.

Zara is a sexy cute girl!

Sorry who's this Conan talking at the table right now?

There is also a reason why for 90 out of 100 times, Leora (probably the Queen of content here) was & is on the top row of Replay. You think her fans won't riot if she decides to read a book, go out or laze around all day, without nudity and bate shows for them? And this fucking why RLC pays her well cos they themselves sell their content based on sexual nature & she provides it!

And guys, please bear in mind that for any decent, moderated online forum (not a tea party forum), there shouldn't be anyone telling someone else to leave or go away (or say something like 'end of discussion') simply because whatever he or she said, you don't agree with. This is immature and childish behaviour, like a fucking troll who cannot be corrected or disagreed with. You want to act like Putin, Kim or Xi (no Trump, cos he is a real clown), then actually go do some real work & somehow work your way up to be a dictator. Probably shouldn't waste your precious time here imo.

I would probably agree with most of what you said if their room is free to view. The sisters wasting a room & literally just using the apartment to sleep & relax. They take part in no activities which the viewers paid to see & thus provide ZERO content for paying viewers. There is simply no way to excuse these girls & their do-nothingness. But well there is one actually, that is to make their room free to view or to give them an apartment of their own & make the whole apartment free. I would not say one more negative comment if this happens. And talking about girls getting along well, acting genuinely and no shit shows, aren't these 'normal behaviour' that we should be expecting to see among these girls who are on the same boat? I really don't see the point why these girls should be 'plotting against each other' & I truly believe most of them are friends or already knew each other before joining this project. And in B4, Ulyana & Olivia aren't getting along well? Harley & Fiora aren't getting along well? Holly & Tweety aren't getting along well? Both Ulyana & Olivia aren't getting along well with the rest in that house? The only exception is probably B2, which I feel the girls there are 'acting abit weird', even between Alana & Kristy but that's probably it.

You know this is bullshit right? Just some supposedly 'legal terms' they put up so that people just can't claim a refund because they see that there is a lack of content. There is no such thing as a bonus for the viewers when you already charge this into your subscription fee. If all of us are paying 5-10 euros per month, then I accept this. But subscribers are paying 45 euros per month, and you tell me sexual content is a bonus? Nowadays, which pornographic website charges their viewers 45 euros per month and tell them everything else you expect to see is a bonus?

No no no, that is real life. Girls use cushions to protect their modesty when they are all alone in a room 😏 This simply just Serafima - Stay #1 all over again. Zero content but you can read all the bullshit from the RLC Defenders gang here.

We the paying subscribers should be grateful that RLC put Marlene & Karol in this apartment instead of complaining about the two do-nothing freeloaders 😏

All these that you mentioned have proven to be true for some girls. Some of the girls already have their nude profiles on other sites before they join the RLC's project (which is understandable cos not all 'normal girls we see on the streets' are open to be cam girls). Whether RLC has a cut in their revenue earned outside the apartments is perhaps not explicitly known to us 😏.

Ya so they are but then again, RLC don't give a shit until the subscription numbers drop significantly enough. Like imagine you are RLC, would you give a shit about people writing in (if there are people writing in at all) to complain about 'missing girls' from their cam site? No you don't, cos it does not affect the + and -. RLC has always been one of the worst content providers (if not the worst) when it comes to responding to feedback from those who pay them.

You should really read that, that is the Code of the RLC Defenders and those 'romantic believers' of the voyeurism nonsense that is going on around here. If you disagree with what he said, then thank goodness you are sane. If not, I am fucking sorry man.

Fucking joke, telling it like you think we are senile.

No, you lot and many more of your kind here are believing what you already want to believe. Terms IBB.CO Image Terms hosted in ImgBB This is the concept that RLC is really selling, adult entertainment via cam girls living in apartments arranged by RLC. You used the term 'whores', but cam girls are not whores (i guess we all know that, at least not all of them). You used the words 'but they have to pretend', so tell me, does pretending not to be cam girls not make them the cam girls that they are? You said "this is what make the idea of the voyeur...', no no no this is just what you want to believe in. This is what RLC markets itself to be but actually, they are just a 'corporate cam girl site'. This is market positioning, they want to avoid to be seen as competitors to MFC or other cam girls sites and push out this 'voyeur element' so that guys like you would 'happily buy in' and pay for this bullshit. You said "you are not paying to to get them fucked with strangers...', no we are! You are! You are paying to watch them get fucked by strangers and stop denying this to be true. If you are not paying them, who is paying them? RLC? Out of charity cos RLC is showing their content to you for free? Goodness, how fucking brain-washed you can be and how so many of the lot here actually believe in this nonsense. You are fucking paying them to spread their legs in front of the cameras. If you are not paying them, they would fucking leave the apartments and do something else! Let that sink in!

Taken from Wikipedia So tell me my dear innocent puppy, fine gentleman of all standards known to mankind, which part of this citation from Wikipedia does not describe Karol, Harley (i love this girl btw), Radislava and the rest?

No you don't, cos if you do you would realise RLC is in fact a cam girls website. They are no fucking real voyeurism bullshit.