Jump to content

Leora, Malia General Chat Topic #65 August 2020


HarleyFatboy

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Nicholas said:

     Some good points made marco. Of course there are those who have tunnel vision or narrow mindedness enough on certain matters in life, and evidently one being as to what actually is, or should be considered to be, as to whether or not any certain individuals should be considered porn actors or actresses simply because of there being ways at times to observe when some of those individuals may be involved in sexual situations or activities. Which the same individuals also consider that a voyeur site such as rlc should be considered a porn site as well because of the same. It would be fair to believe that some of the same individuals who believe those things, also probably believe that movies rated PG should actually be rated R, and that movies rated R should actually be rated X, and that movies rated only X should really be rated XX or XXX.  

by "those", i guess one of those is me?  the only difference between RLC and porn movies is that in porn movies there is a roving camera man/woman making sure you get to see all the best angles.  RLC is static porn where the participants can choose to show you the best possible angles or not.  In either case, it's still porn and i'm sorry you think that people like myself and apparently others that don't agree with you, are narrow minded with tunnel vision.  Sexual acts broadcast to millions of people are porn whether you agree with me or not!  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...