Jump to content

B2 - General Topic 2024 #22 (December)


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Maxbell said:

I havent really seen that specific scenario but I get what you are saying. Based on that, there is evidence that is a smoking gun. More often than not though, a lot that gets said here that is complete speculation and generally unprovable. It can be food for thought and at times ring true. Circumstantial evidence is good, also when there is a history with that person banging off camera that we know of, then it’s likely. 
 

but all I was really talking about is payment structures though. And not trying to slag anyone. 

i get what you're saying and i know you weren't trying to slag anyone!  there are just some people on this forum that can be shown circumstantial evidence and unless they actually seen them in the act, then they would say it didn't happen.  that to me is an asinine way of thinking!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, maxfactor said:

This forum was bombarded with outcrys about "fake shows" (girl girl) for well over a year.  The changes RLC made now are a result of that.  They brought in guys and the subs fell off and it has been a death spiral ever since.  RLC introduced xlife in a cynical attempt to "reflect the wishes" of those who want to see "real life".  

Guys who get off on masturbation and watching couples are the root of the problem.

For the whole time that I've been reading this forum, it has overwhelmingly been anti male.  You only have to look at the comments and insults every time a man visits the apartments to see that, compared to the comments when a woman visits.  If RLC actually instructed the tenants to do anything, and they based their instructions on what they read in this forum, they would be telling them not to bring guys to the apartment.  They would also have gotten rid of Nelly and Bogdan a long time ago.  RLC doesn't give a shit about the constant crying in this forum.

RLC have precise viewing figures for every camera, so they know exactly what people are watching and navigating towards.  They also know how many subscribers they have and how much they make through subscriptions and tokens, etc.  Why would they give such importance to comments in a forum that they despise and try to shut down, over viewing figures and subscription numbers.

Also, you contradict yourself.  You tell us RLC pushes guys on us and as a result have been losing subscribers for a long time and are in a death spiral, yet just a few weeks ago, you told us RLC knows what sells and that girl/girl stuff will get them subscriptions.

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, maxfactor said:
7 hours ago, luvdoggy1111 said:

I honestly think it might be turning right with Jessi. Not yet naked, but she has no problem with sexy thongs anymore. I really hope it's not too late for her. 

If they pay her, she will do it.

 

4 hours ago, maxfactor said:

RLC is not paying for "bates"

So what you're saying is:  RLC don't pay for masturbations because they expect that from them anyway, but they don't expect nudity from them and have to pay extra for it...  and the reason that Jessi hasn't been naked yet, is because RLC won't sanction it and refuse to pay for it. 🤣

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...