B2 - General Topic 2026 #5 (April / May)

[thereala78]

18 minutes ago, Brit Guy said:

The best ...at what ...going AWOL for 90% of the time, btw you certainly aren't the best member on CC 😆

But his opinion counts just as much as yours… 

[Mi02]

7 hours ago, ddhm said:

There are many excellent tenants , people , personalities and characters that I enjoy RLC watching and pay pleasantly to have daily on my screen and watch . I have accepted and understand obviously that nobody can be 100% happy with what we have , we can’t like all tenants or feel pleased on how they “ manage “ and live their lives on cameras 

With Astra and Roxa I simply feel “ cheated “ by RLC providing me these two girls , further more it is BEYOND my understanding on how and why RLC pays two girls who simply DO NOT CARE . With that being said , believing also that my thoughts reflect many other subscribers , I can’t hide my displeasure on having Astra as a tenant . I praise RLC for the nice and absolutely suitable being on camera tenants  but at the same time , I will be very bad mouth speaking for their business on things they do and “ insult “ my common sense .  

Ce que tu n'as pas compris c'est que RLC ne s'est jamais soucié de ce que pensent les abonnés, y'a que les résidents qui comptent à leurs yeux.

Quand ils perdent des abonnés à cause de la mauvaise qualité de ses résidents, ils préfèrent fermer des appartements ou avoir des lits vides pour baisser leur frais que de virer ceux qui sont là et n'apportent rien aux abonnés. Les résidents qui ne font rien ont plus de chance de rester longtemps et de revenir plus souvent dans le projet que ceux qui apportent de l'audience...

Donc si tu trouves que le prix de l'abonnement vaut toujours le coût de rester abonné, continuer à payer mais il ne faut pas attendre à voir du changement.

[thereala78]

1 hour ago, Mi02 said:

Ce que tu n'as pas compris c'est que RLC ne s'est jamais soucié de ce que pensent les abonnés, y'a que les résidents qui comptent à leurs yeux.

Quand ils perdent des abonnés à cause de la mauvaise qualité de ses résidents, ils préfèrent fermer des appartements ou avoir des lits vides pour baisser leur frais que de virer ceux qui sont là et n'apportent rien aux abonnés. Les résidents qui ne font rien ont plus de chance de rester longtemps et de revenir plus souvent dans le projet que ceux qui apportent de l'audience...

Donc si tu trouves que le prix de l'abonnement vaut toujours le coût de rester abonné, continuer à payer mais il ne faut pas attendre à voir du changement.

Tu n’as pas complètement tord, je pense… il s’agit d’un équilibre difficile à trouver…
Effectivement, RLC doit rémunérer « convenablement » les participant(e)s… même ceux/celles qui ne font rien ont le droit à un salaire minimum. Mais si les souscriptions ne sont pas suffisantes, cela devient compliqué… et dans ce cas ils préfèrent garder des participants moyens qu’ils rémunèrent moyennement plutôt que de participants très actifs qu’il faudrait rémunérer 2 fois plus…

Personne ne sait exactement comment leur système de paiement fonctionne mais je pense que le cœur du problème est là… l’argent… c’est toujours l’argent qui dicte les choix et effectivement pas ce que nous voulons nous les clients/viewers 😉

[CuriousOne693]

6 minutes ago, thereala78 said:

Tu n’as pas complètement tord, je pense… il s’agit d’un équilibre difficile à trouver…
Effectivement, RLC doit rémunérer « convenablement » les participant(e)s… même ceux/celles qui ne font rien ont le droit à un salaire minimum. Mais si les souscriptions ne sont pas suffisantes, cela devient compliqué… et dans ce cas ils préfèrent garder des participants moyens qu’ils rémunèrent moyennement plutôt que de participants très actifs qu’il faudrait rémunérer 2 fois plus…

Personne ne sait exactement comment leur système de paiement fonctionne mais je pense que le cœur du problème est là… l’argent… c’est toujours l’argent qui dicte les choix et effectivement pas ce que nous voulons nous les clients/viewers 😉

True, unless they suddenly start losing tons of subscribers which is, sadly, very unlikely.

[thereala78]

21 minutes ago, CuriousOne693 said:

True, unless they suddenly start losing tons of subscribers which is, sadly, very unlikely.

I think that's the issue actually 😞 

[ddhm]

9 hours ago, thereala78 said:

Same amount of money? Do you know how much they are paid?

I can tell you that girls don’t earn the same amount of money… it has always been and is still like that 😉
Or if they do it’s because they did/show the same things 😉

It happens that I know the payments ( the girls used to reveal that on cameras in the past forgetting that cameras monitor the talks or valuable translators who are still “ hiding “ in CamCaps 😉 and they rightfully do so ) , not the exact number but quite precisely let say , what is essential to know is that nowadays the money is BY FAR much much less than what used to be . It is also a reason that the quality is reduced but for long time subscribers , it is easily to say the difference .

 

All I can say , the villa girls are getting paid much much more than the Barcelona downtown apartments , there have been times that girls have been surprised of payments which seemed for them very low according to their contribution .

 

In general , it is a very “ sensitive “ subject but again , what is undeniable is that the salaries have been REDUCED and the quality has also been reduced . 

[ddhm]

3 hours ago, thereala78 said:

👍

Uly is RLC and RLC is Uly… quite simple 😛

Most probably he didn’t answer one of his messages in Instagram or she blocked him . Whenever a tenant isn’t “ behaving “ nice at him at social , he gets ballistic towards this tenant . This is CONFIRMED .. 

[Brit Guy]

14 minutes ago, ddhm said:

Most probably he didn’t answer one of his messages in Instagram or she blocked him . Whenever a tenant isn’t “ behaving “ nice at him at social , he gets ballistic towards this tenant . This is CONFIRMED .. 

I hate Uly on RLC because she's useless, but I see her on social media where she is a pleasure to see in the outside world doing nice and less seedy things like petty bates on RLC for your type of people ...confirmed. 

[thereala78]

11 minutes ago, ddhm said:

It happens that I know the payments ( the girls used to reveal that on cameras in the past forgetting that cameras monitor the talks or valuable translators who are still “ hiding “ in CamCaps 😉 and they rightfully do so ) , not the exact number but quite precisely let say , what is essential to know is that nowadays the money is BY FAR much much less than what used to be . It is also a reason that the quality is reduced but for long time subscribers , it is easily to say the difference .

 

All I can say , the villa girls are getting paid much much more than the Barcelona downtown apartments , there have been times that girls have been surprised of payments which seemed for them very low according to their contribution .

 

In general , it is a very “ sensitive “ subject but again , what is undeniable is that the salaries have been REDUCED and the quality has also been reduced . 

You talk about the past... good we are talking about now or few months ago 😉 

Of course, in the past, payment was better but I think incomes was better too and also quality and activity was better... so normal payment was better 😉

The money is not BY FAR much much less... and if you compare the villa girls with other apt.. of course... thgere is more activities in the villa than in other apt... simply because there are more tenants...

Now do you think the quality has declined because the salaries has reduced or the salaries has reduced because the quality has declined? 😛 

[ddhm]

3 hours ago, Mi02 said:

Ce que tu n'as pas compris c'est que RLC ne s'est jamais soucié de ce que pensent les abonnés, y'a que les résidents qui comptent à leurs yeux.

Quand ils perdent des abonnés à cause de la mauvaise qualité de ses résidents, ils préfèrent fermer des appartements ou avoir des lits vides pour baisser leur frais que de virer ceux qui sont là et n'apportent rien aux abonnés. Les résidents qui ne font rien ont plus de chance de rester longtemps et de revenir plus souvent dans le projet que ceux qui apportent de l'audience...

Donc si tu trouves que le prix de l'abonnement vaut toujours le coût de rester abonné, continuer à payer mais il ne faut pas attendre à voir du changement.

Je dirais que RLC ne se soucie pas de ce qui est écrit ici sur Camcaps, mais je pense qu'ils se soucient de leurs abonnés, sinon le site n'existerait plus. Mes dernières réflexions (j'en ai également parlé) sont que RLC semble avoir réduit son implication à Barcelone, mais ils se portent très bien au Monténégro (leur meilleur hub) et assez bien en République tchèque et en Pologne. Il est étrange que le hub de Barcelone semble être « abandonné », alors que c'est celui qui leur rapporte le plus d'abonnements et qui a le plus de visiteurs. Cela a peut-être un lien avec l'augmentation des coûts, mais je pense que la guerre a affecté les opérations générales à Barcelone et, en même temps, le hub du Monténégro fonctionne plus facilement et sans stress, et en plus, les personnes qui y travaillent sont russes (je pense que le projet fonctionne mieux sous une direction russe).

 

Le problème, et ce que tout le monde semble oublier, c'est qu'avec l'essor fulgurant des réseaux sociaux, les locataires communiquent désormais avec les visiteurs (ce qui est formellement interdit) et sont eux aussi impactés par ce qui est écrit, plus que jamais et avec une ampleur sans précédent par rapport à ce qui a été publié ici sur CamCaps. L'équilibre est rompu, mais comme je l'ai dit, le problème est surtout visible à Barcelone. RLC y est parvenu pendant 15 ans ; ils doivent donc faire les choses correctement, mais depuis la guerre, beaucoup de choses ont changé.

[ddhm]

5 minutes ago, thereala78 said:

You talk about the past... good we are talking about now or few months ago 😉 

Of course, in the past, payment was better but I think incomes was better too and also quality and activity was better... so normal payment was better 😉

The money is not BY FAR much much less... and if you compare the villa girls with other apt.. of course... thgere is more activities in the villa than in other apt... simply because there are more tenants...

Now do you think the quality has declined because the salaries has reduced or the salaries has reduced because the quality has declined? 😛 

I can only tell that the girls would do much much more if the money was better . But I believe in the past the tenants seemed to LOVE being a RLC tenant while nowadays is just girls who are brought to fill in beds . An easy explanation would be that in the past , the girls were brought from Eastern Europe , the payments for them were EXTREMELY insanely higher according to what they were making in their countries and they also loved being in Barcelona , the lifestyle , the men , anything for them was a unique experience . After the Covid and now during the war , Barcelona hub has shifted to local girls that have less motivation let’s say , that’s why I think it is ALL much much less quality than in the past . We have seen some great locals the last years but they have the safety of their Barcelona apartments and they don’t - in my opinion - contribute the same like the girls who were coming from Russia , Belarus , Ukraine , Moldova and so on . Patience is the key and we pay for better content that it is “ served “ but I believe RLC always manages to find ways to keep the site interesting ( Montenegro is the proof for that ) .

[thereala78]

37 minutes ago, ddhm said:

Most probably he didn’t answer one of his messages in Instagram or she blocked him . Whenever a tenant isn’t “ behaving “ nice at him at social , he gets ballistic towards this tenant . This is CONFIRMED .. 

I think you are right for some tenants or old tenants like Aya or Astra who blocked him 😛 but actually Uly didn't yet 😉 But actually I don't think she cares about what he or we said here 😉