Brit Guy Posted October 4 Posted October 4 2 minutes ago, Sulzer said: I think that has now changed, im hoping she has realised there is more to been in the Villa than Masshole. You think or you hope, because ultimately Masshole can't do ANYTHING to stop Ellaya being interested in his cock, not even fucking other women. If he fucked even her Bimbo mate she got so upset over for hanging out with Masshole, not even a fuck would not stop her. She dispatched her Bimbo mate pretty quick because she was a threat whilst everyone else in B4 isn't or they are just smart enough to see through his BS where Ellaya isn't ...or doesn't give a shit. 1
Brit Guy Posted October 4 Posted October 4 4 minutes ago, Sulzer said: There are plenty of women on here and elsewhere we all might have a fantasy to fuck and never will, thats life....... Precisely ...and there's many people on here who are free to say what they wish about the participants whether you are a follower or detractor and whether they are insulting or being nice ...it's all allowed here.
Maxbell Posted October 4 Posted October 4 14 minutes ago, Brit Guy said: Friendships they continue with once they leave RLC? Who knows, but the interaction is more than welcome while they are on RLC. Of course the downside is less English. The upside is less Mass. 😄 2
Brit Guy Posted October 4 Posted October 4 13 minutes ago, Maxbell said: Who knows, but the interaction is more than welcome while they are on RLC. Of course the downside is less English. The upside is less Mass. 😄 Boo hoo 😶😆
Epikouros Posted October 4 Posted October 4 Il y a 3 heures, thereala78 a dit : Of course they can... tenants can be blamed for that... but again, they can or not... they do what they want as they ask tenants to leave for any reason or none... 😕 What I meant to say is that it would be very overbearing & intrusive of RLC if they actually did that. Not to mention having to "keep guard" & watching to see if no VHTV tenants happen to visit... And then having to fire an existing tenant (or several!) for inviting them, thereby shooting themselves in the foot again. Impractical & untenable imo, and that's why I don't think they really do or enforce this (though they still might refuse to re-hire them as tenants of course). And what if someone was just a guest at a VHTV apartment? Would they be banned from being a tenant or even just a guest at an RLC apartment, too?... And how would they keep track of all that?... Seems more trouble than it's worth... Of course the tenant inviting them can be blamed if their guest causes trouble or breaks something etc... But that goes for all guests, not just VHTV tenants/guests. The issue just didn't really arise yet, but might (& just did, with Gelia) now that both RLC & VHTV have apartments in Barcelona, with (ex-)tenants who know each other or are even friends... It might play a role in deciding if/when to send someone away, but as you said RLC already does that rather erratically (for us) when VHTV is not involved anyway. But it would be very petty and stupid to fire a good tenant for this, especially if no replacement is available. Imagine if Massimo or one of the girls picked up a VHTV tenant (or several!) and brought them to B4 for sex (or an orgy)! I don't think RLC would or should have a problem with the increase in views & possibly subs in that case!... Perhaps VHTV might, though 😉 but I have no idea about VHTV's policy regarding this. (which, just as RLC's, could indeed change at any moment anyway).
Epikouros Posted October 4 Posted October 4 Il y a 1 heure, isidore57 a dit : The other number is already back in B4 and he is in his room, he must be looking at the bathroom. I know I would! 😛
thereala78 Posted October 4 Posted October 4 5 minutes ago, Epikouros said: What I meant to say is that it would be very overbearing & intrusive of RLC if they actually did that. Not to mention having to "keep guard" & watching to see if no VHTV tenants happen to visit... And then having to fire an existing tenant (or several!) for inviting them, thereby shooting themselves in the foot again. Impractical & untenable imo, and that's why I don't think they really do or enforce this (though they still might refuse to re-hire them as tenants of course). And what if someone was just a guest at a VHTV apartment? Would they be banned from being a tenant or even just a guest at an RLC apartment, too?... And how would they keep track of all that?... Seems more trouble than it's worth... Of course the tenant inviting them can be blamed if their guest causes trouble or breaks something etc... But that goes for all guests, not just VHTV tenants/guests. The issue just didn't really arise yet, but might (& just did, with Gelia) now that both RLC & VHTV have apartments in Barcelona, with (ex-)tenants who know each other or are even friends... It might play a role in deciding if/when to send someone away, but as you said RLC already does that rather erratically (for us) when VHTV is not involved anyway. But it would be very petty and stupid to fire a good tenant for this, especially if no replacement is available. Imagine if Massimo or one of the girls picked up a VHTV tenant (or several!) and brought them to B4 for sex (or an orgy)! I don't think RLC would or should have a problem with the increase in views & possibly subs in that case!... Perhaps VHTV might, though 😉 but I have no idea about VHTV's policy regarding this. (which, just as RLC's, could indeed change at any moment anyway). Yes perhaps you are right... let's try 😛 Big party at the villa with Gelia, Karma, Brandon and Lev! And let's see what happens next 😁 1 1
Epikouros Posted October 4 Posted October 4 il y a 1 minute, thereala78 a dit : Yes perhaps you are right... let's try 😛 Big party at the villa with Gelia, Karma, Brandon and Lev! And let's see what happens next 😁 Lev probably wouldn't want to do RLC that favour. And they might have more to fear from VHTV's reaction than from RLC's in that case, I think... So I'm afraid this will unfortunately stay a hypothetical scenario anyway... 😉 1
SPYING 1 Posted October 4 Posted October 4 15 minutes ago, Epikouros said: What I meant to say is that it would be very overbearing & intrusive of RLC if they actually did that. Not to mention having to "keep guard" & watching to see if no VHTV tenants happen to visit... And then having to fire an existing tenant (or several!) for inviting them, thereby shooting themselves in the foot again. Impractical & untenable imo, and that's why I don't think they really do or enforce this (though they still might refuse to re-hire them as tenants of course). And what if someone was just a guest at a VHTV apartment? Would they be banned from being a tenant or even just a guest at an RLC apartment, too?... And how would they keep track of all that?... Seems more trouble than it's worth... Of course the tenant inviting them can be blamed if their guest causes trouble or breaks something etc... But that goes for all guests, not just VHTV tenants/guests. The issue just didn't really arise yet, but might (& just did, with Gelia) now that both RLC & VHTV have apartments in Barcelona, with (ex-)tenants who know each other or are even friends... It might play a role in deciding if/when to send someone away, but as you said RLC already does that rather erratically (for us) when VHTV is not involved anyway. But it would be very petty and stupid to fire a good tenant for this, especially if no replacement is available. Imagine if Massimo or one of the girls picked up a VHTV tenant (or several!) and brought them to B4 for sex (or an orgy)! I don't think RLC would or should have a problem with the increase in views & possibly subs in that case!... Perhaps VHTV might, though 😉 but I have no idea about VHTV's policy regarding this. (which, just as RLC's, could indeed change at any moment anyway). That's a long ass ddhm post 📫 are you trying to write ✍️ a novel or are you trying to be ddhm 😱 1 1
thereala78 Posted October 4 Posted October 4 3 minutes ago, Epikouros said: Lev probably wouldn't want to do RLC that favour. And they might have more to fear from VHTV's reaction than from RLC's in that case, I think... So I'm afraid this will unfortunately stay a hypothetical scenario anyway... 😉 I think Gelia's brief appearance was just a case of necessity... assuming she had indeed left some things in the garage... Nothing wrong with that... nobody invited her. But of course, they're making a big deal out of it here... 😁 1 1
Epikouros Posted October 4 Posted October 4 il y a 4 minutes, SPYING 1 a dit : That's a long ass ddhm post 📫 are you trying to write ✍️ a novel or are you trying to be ddhm 😱 I consider it my duty to educate you proles here with my enlightened & nuanced prose. 🙂 Perhaps you should try reading, it's a nice change from social media brain rot. As a plus, this will only confuse FZ into thinking me & ddhm are the same person with two accounts again, which can only lead to future hilarity! 😛 1 2
MarioneTagliafico2 Posted October 4 Posted October 4 Io vi saluto, gente. Ho provato a fare l'abbonamento per un mese e devo ammettere che non mi sono divertito per niente. Tante belle cose a tutti e un saluto da parte di Massimo. Bye!!! 2
Recommended Posts