Foamy T. Squirrel Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 Did I hear someone pull a quote from Col. Kurtz? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaHj2B3iXHY&list=UU7I48XqECiMDWYU7zPBYYpg&index=3&feature=plcp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarenKraft Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarenKraft Posted May 15, 2015 Share Posted May 15, 2015 Did I hear someone pull a quote from Col. Kurtz? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodworker Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 Great stuff! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarenKraft Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 In that same vein.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarenKraft Posted May 16, 2015 Share Posted May 16, 2015 So, as Clemensa might say, "Now Toto sleeps with the vicious." Sorry, I couldn't resist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foamy T. Squirrel Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 We might need to start a new thread on "Old Dude's" for these video masterpieces... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarenKraft Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 We might need to start a new thread on "Old Dude's" for these video masterpieces... Do it; do it; do it. [ yay ] Would it be just for parodies or for amusing videos of other stripes as well? Excluding "reality" bullshit like amazing dogs and jerks damaging their groins. Scripted and produced funny films? Humorous not-too-long movies -- snort shorts if you will -- oh yes. Would these qualify? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarenKraft Posted May 18, 2015 Share Posted May 18, 2015 WONDERFUL FOLKS TO WORK WITH! CHICKEN GIRL MANGO Here's to ALL MY FRIENDS !!!! © 1987 Charles Bukowski, BARFLY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarenKraft Posted May 25, 2015 Share Posted May 25, 2015 Washington Times - Letter to the Editor 6/7/95 - Thomas Colton Ruthford During the past several months in the American press, the Democrats have frequently denounced the Republicans as Nazis due to their attempts to control runaway federal spending. How very ironic. I remember the Nazis. Let me share a little about them and recall some of their exploits. First of all, "Nazi" was gutter slang for the verb "to nationalize". The Bieder-Mienhoff gang gave themselves this moniker during their early struggles. The official title of the Nazi Party was "The National Socialist Workers Party of Germany". Hitler and the Brownshirts advocated the nationalization of education, health care, transportation, national resources, manufacturing, distribution and law enforcement. Hitler came to power by turning the working class, unemployed, and academic elite against the conservative republic. After der fuhrer's election ceased being a political conspiracy and was transformed into a fashionable social phenomenon, party membership was especially popular with educators, bureaucrats, and the press. Being a Nazi was politically correct. They called themselves "The Children of the New Age of World Order" and looked down their noses at everyone else. As Hitler accrued more power, he referred to his critics as "The Dark Forces of Anarchy and Hatred". Anyone who questioned Nazi high-handedness in the German press was branded a "Conservative Reactionary". Joseph Goebbels, minister of communications, proclaimed a "New World Order". The Nazi reign of terror began with false news reports on the Jews, Bohemians and Gypsies who were said to be arming themselves to overthrow the "New World Order" and Hitler demanded that all good people register their guns so that they wouldn't fall into the hands of "terrorists and madmen". Right wing fanatics of the "Old Order" who protested firearms registration were arrested by the S.S. and put in jail for "fomenting hatred against the Government of the German people". Then the Reichstag (government building) was blown up and Hitler ram-rodded an "Emergency Anti-Terrorist Act" through Parliament that gave the Gestapo extraordinary powers. The leader then declared that for the well-being of the German people, all private firearms were to be confiscated by the Gestapo and the Wermotten (federal law enforcement and military). German citizens who refused to surrender their guns when the "jack-boots" (Gestapo) came calling, were murdered in their homes. By the way, the Gestapo were the federal marshals' service of the Third Reich. The S.W.A.T. team was invented and perfected by the Gestapo to break into the homes of the enemies of the German people. When the Policia Bewakken, or local police, refused to take away guns from townsfolk, they themselves were disarmed and dragged out into the street and shot to death by the S.A. and the S.S. Those were Nazi versions of the B.A.T.F. and the F.B.I. When several local ministers spoke out against these atrocities, they were imprisoned and never seen again. The Gestapo began to confiscate and seize the homes, businesses, bank accounts, and personal belongings of wealthy conservative citizens who had prospered in the old Republic. Pamphleteers who urged revolt against the Nazis were shot on site by national law enforcement and the military. Gypsies and Jews were detained and sent to labor camps. Mountain roads throughout central Europe were closed to prevent the escape of fugitives into the wilderness, and to prevent the movement and concealment of partisan resistance fighters. Public schools rewrote history and Hitler youth groups taught the children to report their parents to their teachers for anti-Nazi remarks. Such parents disappeared. Pagan animism became the state religion of the Third Reich and Christians were widely condemned as "right wing fanatics". Millions of books were burned first and then people. Millions of them burned in huge ovens after they were first gassed to death. Unmarried women were paid large sums of money to have babies out of wedlock and then given medals for it. Evil was declared as being good, and good was condemned as being evil. World Order was coming and the German people were going to be the "peacekeepers". Yes, indeed, I remember the Nazis and they weren't Republicans, or "right wing", or "patriots" or "militias". They were Socialist monsters. -Thomas Colton Ruthford "In Germany they first came for the Communists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me--and by that time no one was left to speak up." -Pastor Martin Niemoller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarenKraft Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozi Posted September 7, 2015 Author Share Posted September 7, 2015 NOT all Americans will be mourning 9/11 victims and their families this Friday on the 14th anniversary of the attacks. Hundreds of college kids across the country will instead be taught to sympathise with the terrorists. That’s because their America-hating leftist professors are systematically indoctrinating them into believing it’s all our fault, that the US deserved punishment for “imperialism” — and the kids are too young to remember or understand what really happened that horrific day. Case in point is a freshman-level English class taught at several major universities across the country called “The Literature of 9/11” — which focuses almost entirely on writings from the perspective of the Islamic terrorists, rather than the nearly 3,000 Americans who were slaughtered by them. The syllabus, which includes books like The Reluctant Fundamentalist and Poems from Guantanamo: Detainees Speak, portray terrorists as “freedom fighters” driven by oppressive US foreign policies. Source: New York Post Even highly ranked University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has adopted the curriculum. The 9/11 seminar is taught by UNC associate English professor Neel Ahuja, who specialises in “post-colonial studies.” In Ahuja’s twisted world view, al Qaeda terrorists are the real victims. “Abu Zubaydah’s torture may be interpreted as simply one more example of the necropower of US imperialism, the power to coerce and kill targeted populations,” Ahuja recently wrote in an academic paper criticising the war on terror. He says America’s depiction of the 9/11 terrorists as “monsters” is merely an attempt to “animalise” them as insects and justify “squashing” them in “a fantasy of justice.” This colonialist “construct” of an “animalised enemy,” he added, “dovetails with the work of mourning the nation after 9/11 (which in the logic of security must be made perpetual, melancholic).” To him, it’s all cynically designed to justify more “imperial violence” against “Muslim, Arab and South Asian men.” Ahuja goes on to decry the US “colonisation” of Afghanistan and north-western Pakistan, along with “aerial bombing (and) indefinite detention” of al Qaeda terrorists at Gitmo. In other writings, the professor bashes Israel and sides with Palestinian terrorists, further revealing his agenda. He clearly has an axe to grind, which critics say the university gives him license to exercise through “The Literature of 9/11” curriculum. A group of concerned UNC students has complained to administrators that the 9/11 course, also taught at the University of Maryland and other campuses, is being used to brainwash impressionable underclassmen. “These readings offer points of view that justify terrorism, paint the United States and its government as wholly evil and immoral and desecrate the memory of the victims of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks,” the UNC College Republicans said in a recent letter to Chancellor Carol Folt. “There is not a single reading required that focuses on the lives of the victims, the victim’s [sic] families, American soldiers (or) families of American soldiers,” they added. “Nor is there a perspective that portrays the United States as acting in good faith before, during and after the Sept. 11 attacks.” The course, moreover, “does not teach students how to think, it teaches them what to think,” the letter continued. “And the material it presents is an apologetic for the violence and murder against the United States.” The university replied that freshmen should be exposed to differing points of view, even radical ones. “Part of the college experience is the opportunity to learn from those who have differing points of view. Carolina’s first-year seminar program is part of that growth,” the administration said in a press statement, while insisting “the university isn’t forcing a set of beliefs on students.” But several students who have taken the course warned in a professor review blog that Ahuja, who earns $US72,100 ($A104,094) a year spewing his unAmerican propaganda, does not tolerate dissent. “He favours kids who share his views, so learn to do that,” said one reviewer. “A very interesting guy, just don’t disagree with him.” Added another student, in a January 2014 post: “I would avoid contradicting him openly.” “AGREE WITH HIS STANCE IN YOUR PAPERS!!!!!” advised another in November. What’s happening in Chapel Hill is not isolated. Presenting terrorists in a sympathetic light and the US as an imperialist nation is standard fare. This is what, in varying degrees, most college kids are learning today, all over the US. Paul Sperry, a visiting media fellow at the Hoover Institution, is author of ‘Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated Washington’. Email him at [email protected]. This article originally appeared on New York Post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts