Jump to content
*** New Software Coming Soon! Please Check for Important Information in the Read Me Section ***

Ozi

Members
  • Posts

    1,469
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Points

    -25 [ Donate ]

Everything posted by Ozi

  1. Life is full of disappointments. Some of them post on CC.
  2. looks like they were trying to connect to the internet and used one of the cam rj5/6 connections. does this mean they have no idea the cams exist? on the other hand, was the kitchen cam not out before they arrived? They connected the computer to the TV. On the Internet, they had already been through WiFi. Camera 1 stopped functioning while they were in the bedroom taking photos. Ahhhh, les connes !!! Stupid blondes girls !!!!! lol ! Why?
  3. FYI She has her periods Hope one day, she'll put one fingers in her asshole !!! I would like to smell it and to lick it !!!! Why doesn't that surprise me.
  4. Does that mean that you will only look at pictures and videos of public cams posted on CC, or will you still look at images from locked cams posted by all the other suckers?
  5. Looks like you've pissed off a heap of Asians.
  6. Define perfect, but make sure it's my interpretation, not yours, so that I can compare Leora and Alisa based on my preferences. Once you've done that then maybe you can define average, normal and a host of other adjectives. But again, make sure you allow for my preferences otherwise your definition is meaningless.
  7. Good move 'cos I would have just told them to fuck off. In fact, I think I just did.
  8. Yep, the owners of the channels that people will watch and pay for will be the ones who get the audience. I guess that means that the owners of the channels that people don't watch and pay for will be the ones that won't get the audience! Not exactly rocket science is it. Don't know about the rest of the world, but Australians have been watching movies and tv shows on computers, tablets and phones for years. And can you tell me exactly and confidently what TYPE of thing (if it's not necessarily RLC) is a prototype of the future? And don't tell me it's reality tv because people have had a gutful of that garbage already.
  9. Can't see the connection. Do you need two beds to have sex? I've always managed with one, more often with none.
  10. Hi ojoslocos, welcome to planet earth. Which planet are you from? Or a different solar system maybe? Seriously, only someone from another planet would use expressions such as social experiment and a study of sociology in connection with RLC. And let’s not leave out the interesting thing here that it is real life with all its normal moments and surely this is not the last of this voyeur living that we'll see. Mate, whatever RLC may have started out as, it is nothing to do with real life or normal anymore. And as for voyeurism, much of it has more in common with chaturbate. Some of the couples maybe close to reality, Nina and Kira, Diana and Efim. But things like Dasha fucking herself with a banana, Daniel filming himself with an iphone having anal sex with Adriana, and Leora now freely masturbating in front of the camera every chance she gets, mate that’s all exhibitionism. And voyeurism is not about watching exhibitionists. A voyeur will watch and maybe even copy what he has seen to watch again. Watching recorded clips made by someone else is watching porn. And now apparently it’s all available on pornhd, along with all the other porn movies and porn stars. If you ever do find a real voyeur site, let me know. In the meantime, I guess we’ll keep watching RLC, but don’t for one second think it’s either real or voyeurism.
  11. Not a phrase used down here but thanks for the info, didn't know my fetish had a nickname!
  12. We don't actually have many taxi drivers that can even speak English and their driving skills are less than the requirement to pass a test to get your provisional licence.
  13. Man Haron Monis is the muslim involved in the recent 'so called' terrorist attack in Australia. The following is a basic profile of his more recent history, drawn from Wikipedia (sorry about that but it is up to date). It's a bit long but I ask you take the time to read it to understand the issue. Man Haron Monis was an Iranian Australian who at the time of his death had recently converted from Shia Islam to Sunni Islam, and pledged his allegiance to the caliphate declared by Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. He had sought political asylum in Australia in 1996 which was granted in 2001. He was also known as Sheikh Haron, Mohammad Hassan Manteghi and Ayatollah Manteghi Boroujerdi. On 15 December 2014, Monis took hostages in a siege at the Lindt Chocolate Café at Martin Place, Sydney, lasting until the early hours of the following morning; he was confirmed by police to be dead at the conclusion of the siege. Monis, together with a colleague, Amirah Droudis, undertook a campaign protesting against the presence of Australian troops in Afghanistan, by writing letters to the families of soldiers killed there, in which he called the soldiers murderers and urged the soldiers' families to petition the government to remove its troops from Afghanistan. According to justice Heydon of the High Court, the letters compared the deceased son of one family to a pig and to a dirty animal. It called the son's body 'contaminated'. It refers to it as 'the dirty body of a pig'. In July 2011, Monis was charged at a St Mary's police station for intimidation of his ex-wife, Noleen Hayson Pal, following a confrontation in a McDonald's car park in Green Valley. Pal claimed Monis had threatened to shoot her and told her that he held a gun licence. On 21 April 2013, Pal's body was found stabbed 17 times and alight in a Werrington apartment stairwell. Monis' girlfriend Amirah Droudis was formally charged with Pal's murder, and on 15 November 2013, Monis was charged by NSW Police with being an accessory before and after the fact to the murder of Pal. On 14 March 2014, Monis was arrested and charged with sexually and indecently assaulting a young woman who went to his consultancy in Wentworthville, New South Wales, for "spiritual healing", after seeing an advertisement in a local newspaper. Monis claimed he was an expert in "astrology, numerology, meditation and black magic" services. Seven months later, on 13 October 2014, a further 40 charges were added, including 22 counts of aggravated sexual assault and 14 counts of aggravated indecent assault, allegedly committed against six more women who had visited his business. Esmaeil Ahmadi-Moghaddam, Iran's chief of police, told reporters that Monis had "a dark and long history of violent crime and fraud" in Iran and had run a travel agency in 1996, before fleeing to Malaysia and then Australia. "It lasted 4 years to collect evidence on Manteghi [Monis]'s identification documents and we reported this to the Australian police but since Australia has no extradition treaty with Iran, they didn't extradite him to Iran". The London-based Persian TV channel Manoto 1 reported that Monis had been working as the managing director of a tourism agency in Iran, and had fled Iran after taking US$200,000 of his customers' money. The same source reported that he was protected from extradition by his refugee status. Iran's official Islamic Republic News Agency states that he was "under prosecution by the Interpol" and Iran provided information to the Australian government about his criminal record, mental and spiritual status. Despite this, he was granted asylum in Australia. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Marzieh Afkham, publicly questioned the Australian government's having taken his criminal status "completely clear", after several discussions. So here is a man wanted in his own country of Iran for prosecution on a number of crimes, known to be violent. Despite pleas from the Iranian government, Australia refused to extradite him back to Iran because he had been given refugee status. Since then he has been charged and convicted for sending abusive correspondence to the families of dead Australian soldiers, been charged with being an accessory before and after the fact to the murder of his wife, as well as numerous charges of aggravated sexual assault of female customers. He is on welfare and as such the Australian taxpayer has paid for his numerous unsuccessful appeals to the Supreme Court and High Court to overturn his conviction for the letters he sent. Despite all the information from the Iranian government, he was still given refugee status. Despite claiming his allegiance to the caliphate declared by Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, he has kept his Australian status. Despite the charges of accessory to murder and multiple aggravated sexual assault charges, he was still allowed to walk the streets. Now he has topped it off by carrying out what is described as a terrorist attack, resulting in the deaths of two innocent Australians. You wonder why I have no faith in my government.
  14. Yadevol, thank you for picking up the error. These figures are based on deaths per 100,000 people not a percentage. The figures should be .96 per 100,000 and 1.87 per 100,000. I didn't realise I'd added the % mark (force of habit 'cos I work with percentages all day). So take out the % and the post still works.
  15. Sorry mate, the only Kerrigan Gap I understand is the gap between promises and results. What's your reference directed to or is it the same (looks good but wouldn't deliver)?
  16. I always find it amusing when people try to rely on statistics for their argument without knowing what they mean. To start, intentional homicide, as defined by UNODC, is "unlawful death purposefully inflicted on a person by another person". So if someone comes at me with a gun and I shoot him in self defence, that's not homicide. However, if I was unable to defend myself and he did manage to shoot me, that is homicide and the percentage goes up. So arguably carrying a gun reduces the number of homicides. Using your statistics, the figure for homicides in the UK without a gun is .96% whereas in the USA, its 1.87%. Take away the guns, it's still a violent country to live in. Take away the guns, the homicide rate would rise further. Why? Because the criminals still have guns. In Australia we now have a new phenomenon, home invasions. Home invasions are not just robbery, they are carried out by criminals knowing that people are home, with the additional intent of causing fear, injury, death and rape. Pure coincidence that these incidents are on the increase since Australia introduced stricter gun controls? I doubt it, it's because the criminals know people can't defend themselves anymore. You could probably find some statistics somewhere to contradict that, but I doubt the many people who have suffered the trauma of a home invasion will believe you. You will also find that these same people who were law abiding citizens and didn't own a weapon because they believed 'the state' would protect them, now own a weapon. Better late than never I guess. Your rubbery source of statistics doesn't include Russia, which doesn't advertise its problems often. There is data available that indicates that very few of Russia's homicides, double that of the USA, are gun related. Explain that. I own weapons and I can access them quickly. I will use them to defend my family. I will not support any government that tries to take those weapons away from me because gun control only applies to law abiding citizens. I openly advertise the fact that I own weapons, am a member of a sporting shooters association and I am capable of using a weapon. I am an ex serving member but still active with the Army Reserve and pass weapons proficiency tests twice a year. I refuse to become a victim. And in case you haven't realised, I DON'T live in the USA, but I can see which way my government is taking this country. Large percentages of violent crimes are being committed by minority ethnic groups, allowed to enter the country for so called humanitarian reasons. They have totally fucked up their own countries and now they bring their shit culture here and try to impose it on us. Violence in their countries is part of their culture and the police are powerless to stop it. You had better be prepared to defend yourself and your family because no one else will.
  17. I saw a video clip which was a presentation on gun laws by someone described as a "Virtual President". Can't remember the whole story but well presented, basically talked about taking weapons off the victims and evil minded people kill and will always find a way. Today eight brothers and sisters between the ages of 18 months and fifteen years old were found stabbed to death in a house in Cairns, Queensland. A real tragedy and one of the worse crimes on record in the state. As sad as it is, I hope people don't resort to the normal political correctness so that people are not offended because of facts and reality. Of the little I've seen, one thing stands out immediately, not a gun in site, not one. I won't go into detail of their cultural background, I'm sure the tree huggers will find some excuse to condone or justify what happened. I know I am about to be branded a heartless, racist and bigoted arsehole, again, but too bad. Facts are facts and until we stop turning a blind eye to reality and address the real problems of violence and culture, we are never going to solve the problems. Typical is the do gooder complaint about the number of black people in jail and I say black not indigenous because sooner or later, second or third or fourth generation whites can surely claim to be indigenous. There are more black people in jail because more black people commit crimes.
  18. Good luck. Have you thought of paying someone to take it?
  19. Let me re-phrase that. So what.
  20. Two people killed in Sydney by a lone gunman with a sawn off shotgun who took hostages in a coffee shop. He was eventually taken out by the police, who may also be responsible for taking out one of the hostages. Sad, but collateral damage happens. Seventeen escaped unharmed, so in reality a good result, maybe. If you look at the guy responsible and his background you would have to surmise that he was a bit of a nut job, but unfortunately he was a muslim so it automatically gets tagged as a terrorist attack and the country has gone crazy. The reaction almost labels the event Australia's 9/11 and there are even discussions of a memorial. Seriously. In addition, the fuckwits are out calling for more stringent laws and further bans on gun ownership. At least one Senator has stated that if we had the same laws as America, the odds are at least 2 or 3 of the hostages would have been armed and chances are the whole thing would have been over in 17 seconds rather than 17 hours. The following video a timely reminder for the US and us Aussies. I think it was originally promoted as Wake Up America. WARNING: Graphic images of weapons being destroyed that some viewers may find distressing and confronting.
  21. And?
  22. Corboblanc: 1- I said that we research on people we look for months or years, not that our research lasted for years, I have personally something else to do. 2 people with whom I share are trusted and in very limited numbers. 3- you have the option here of review, as we all do, but certainly not to impose a dictatorship to others, insults and threats. 4- Have you seen a single picture out rlc posted by me from the case diana ?? do I given any identification ?? 5- I do not show myself on the internet, if I did, I will assume to be recognized because it is the risk .... 6. We do not need members who police improvise on CC, and is used to threaten other members cc, which does not have the same view !!!! 7- If you search for facebook or vk of a girl showing off on the internet, this is called "stalking", definitely you stop the drug, dear friend, and and you change your words!!! So the people you share this information with are trusted and very limited. Great, I assume then that you know them personally? I doubt if I am one of your trusted few yet you sent me an e-mail with information on your activities. How many others get e-mails from you by mistake? I didn't actually say that YOU had posted any personal information about RLC members, it was a generic conversation that you chose to buy into, coincidentally the same time you e-mailed me. You obviously do have a lot of information on the girls, must have spent considerable time "researching" as you put it. Again I ask the question, why? What good is the information to you? You do not show your personal information or identity on the internet because its a risk! Why? Are you embarrassed about things you do on the internet? Scared that you might be harassed, continually spammed, maybe even stalked? Wake up corboblanc, make no mistake regardless of what anyone else tells you, what you are doing is stalking. You can deny it all you like, doesn't change the facts. And admitting that you share this information with other people makes it even creepier. I deal with creeps every day mate, I know one when I come across one. Interesting that you 'liked' StoJa9's post. I can't be 100% certain what he was referring to, but seeing as I'm not the one that "act like you're involved in these people's lives. or you try to be"' then I must assume that its you and your mates that are the "seriously borderline stalker psychos". Regardless of what he meant, it fits. I'm not wasting anymore of my time on you, because you are obviously set in your creepy world, with your creepy mates, to each his own. But for fucks sake, keep it to yourself and stop encouraging all these whackos that keep asking the same stupid fucking questions all the time about personal details of the girls. And again, pretend all you like, what you are doing is stalking, or as the French say harcèlement criminal. And just in case you missed it the first time:
  23. You're Paul right?! Please introduce me to her! ;D Shhh....Keep that a secret. ;) hmmm...I smell a rat...... Bit stronger than that mate....
  24. I think you are another one of the growing breed of fuckwits that CC seems to have attracted recently. I think you should spend your free time researching them. Then, when you find them, I think you should see if you can find a big enough rock you can all crawl under together. Enough thinking for now. the important thing here is to not reveal anything about the identity of the people we have identified !!! if a photo outside rlc diana, leora or any other rlc girls is posted and does not reveal the location or identity of the girl, I do not see what there is wrong !!!dropoff window if your goal is to continue to matter and you wank cock on unknown, then good for you !!! you continue to polish the shaft in front of your computer and stop pissing others !!! members who think they are good moral moderators seriously starting to piss us !!! if you do not know vouler then stay in your fantasy !!! photos that do not allow identified and not wear harm to persons, bring more to DC. If you do not want to see them, do not watch !!! There are a few members on cc that are going to great lengths to discover the true identity of RLC members and I mean great lengths, based on an e-mail that I was obviously sent by mistake. Extract: Frankly, if you have discovered the identity of sofie and lilu (nastya or anastasya), bravo! I tried with your directions on vk, but of nastya's 29 years in Moscow, there are more than 7000! This gave nothing with anastasya, either in Moscow or in Barcelona. When to sofie, nothing either! my research in Russian have nothing given, as for example "Russian in Barcelona model.....................................................". That my friend is not normal. As for your post above, didn't make much sense, was mostly a lot of wank as far as I'm concerned. Take your own advice, you don't like my posts, don't fucking read them. If the information is not sourced about the RLC members from the RLC site, then it's not relevant to cc. If you want to pm other people with this personal information, for whatever perverted reason, that's your business, as long as you send it to the right person. I do not see how your personal message here has any use !!! yes, some members of CC like to research the people they watch every day, for months or years !!! yes, we échangons our information, so what? !!! almost all of the girls are now identifed rlc, he this would not have caused enormous scandals ?? nora was identified rlc On arrival, there was many months and are back today !!! I am Accors on one point, is that asshole unveiled to the identity of Diana, with her name and even his phone number. identities must ABSOLUTELY NOT be shared in public !!! but if the photos do not be traced back to the source, I do not see where is the problem ... You do not see how my personal message here has any use? Now that I find interesting. Maybe I'll have to post the whole e-mail to see if it has relevance. When you translate stalking, which is what you are doing, into French it comes up with harcèlement criminel. Typical French, they don't have just one word for it. So translated back to English, you get criminal harassment. Does that ring any bells, turn on any lights in that thick head of yours. So you research the people for months or years and agree that the information shouldn't be made public. Yet you exchange that information with others, people you don't know. What do they do with that information, do you have any idea? What the fuck do you do with it? Great idea. I make the same request to you as that other fuckwit, post your real name, your address, your profile, for all of us to see, after all there's no harm in knowing it according to you, it will just save me months, even years, of research, though it wouldn't take me years, or even months to find you. And what will I do with that information?
×
×
  • Create New...