-
Posts
1,375 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Points
0 [ Donate ]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Blogs
Competitions
Everything posted by vlkvlk111
-
Barcelona Apt. #2 - Videos (2016)
vlkvlk111 replied to StnCld316's topic in B#2 Tanya, Astra, Roxa (08/02/16)
If my understanding is correct, videos posted in the attachment center are "safe" (when i say safe, I mean safe from dmca claims, the author of the video will still be banned by rlc).It happens that most of the people who post videos do it on external sites like zippyshare or mab.to, where they are struck down by the rlc police within hours, but not by camcaps fault. I don't know why, I assume because the most prolific video posters don't have premium membership to cc ?I am not cc management, but perhaps they could allow uploads to the attachment center for free members, keeping downloads to premium customers ? maybe it will help funnel more videos and exclusives to the attachment center, thus giving more value, thus more customers, to a premium membership. -
Barcelona Apt. #1 - Videos (2016)
vlkvlk111 replied to TMR1's topic in B#4 Veronica, Neytiri, Nani, Dominga, Thais (11/11/15)
Thanks a lot niininch, mad at missing this, but happy that you offer us a glimpse -
Should RLC allow girls to do Cam Shows on this site ??
vlkvlk111 replied to legrandrobert's topic in Polls
I'm split on this issue. It is their work, it is a form of real life. In some sense I am okay-ish as long as the RLC viewers are not shortchanged. Performing in a remote corner (Jess), in a dead angle (Michelle current comptuer setup), turning their back to RLC cameras (the three girls during the short cam session) will only build up anger and resentment against the girls, and against RLC. If we get some decent views, I all happy for this, it is at least more exciting than seeing them on their phones, amorphous on the couch, or on phone with the BF 24/7. To be honest, I completely admit that I would be excited to see Michelle use that giant dildo ... Now on the minus size, while I don't mind an isolated recruitment or two, I don't think it is a good direction for RLC recruitment if they continue in this path. It blurs thing to much. It's confusing to the audience and what RLC wants to achieve with this site. And it shouldn't be detrimental to the recruitment and contract renewal of other girls (I am still mad at the Melissagate ) -
I won't go deeper into this topic, because it is really out of the scope of that kind of discussion - there's plenty of material you can find on the internet about, but in terms of victimization it is alas not that simple There are complex psychological and sociological mechanics (guilt, self deprecation, emotional blackmail ...) , but it can be extremely complicated to flee the grasp of an abuser or a narcissist/perverse manipulator, and it can happen to intelligent and solid women (and men) too. I am sincerely sorry for the girl, and not in a position to judge her
-
So we might see her cam after all, and if she goes to bed, we might have a view. With my luck, I will miss it, but heh Also some Belle lovers might be interested by her potential next work
-
I guessed something was very wrong and unhealthy in Candy's relationship with her BF and alas I was right It must be very difficult right now for the poor girl. I am not sure it is better to stay here and be away from these lowlifes - because she'll be mad with worry, or come back to her dire situation. Frankly, I am sad for that girl. It also reminds us that many of these girls come form really crappy backgrounds, and that we should not be too quick to judge the way the choose to flee away from that - even if some find adult entertainment unpalatable ...
-
Barcelona Apt. #2 - Pictures (2016)
vlkvlk111 replied to StnCld316's topic in B#2 Tanya, Astra, Roxa (08/02/16)
RLC will ban the account of anyone sharing or posting the video, and use dmca claims to have it removed.So the only way is to wait for a video or image dump of a former user who do not care about his account anymore (that s how some footage of the Megan night surfaced). That been said, the screenshots here are practically the best view you could have from this particular night : 99% happened behind bedsheets or on the balcony, you won't see more in the actual footage -
New girl Melissa
vlkvlk111 replied to Noldus's topic in B#4 Veronica, Neytiri, Nani, Dominga, Thais (11/11/15)
Got an answer by the RLC support, they will forward to the RLC management. Let your voices be heard everyone ! -
New girl Jessica
vlkvlk111 replied to Noldus's topic in B#4 Veronica, Neytiri, Nani, Dominga, Thais (11/11/15)
Still no luck finding her, it is driving me nuts -
As I had say before, I have an extremely bad vibe with this whole Candy relationship. I am certainly and hopefully wrong, because I can't understand the language, and I have to rely on the translations on the forums and guesswork, but these kind of things happen always the same way in real life, and the signs are there, according to me. She doesn't appear to be in a healthy relationship at all. Even when you are madly in love, it is natural for couples to be temporarily separated for different reasons (work, health, familily obligations, hobbies, whatever ...), and to cope. She seemed yesterday devastated and frightened to displease him, and he seemed to be using her guilt to blackmail her.
-
New girl Jessica
vlkvlk111 replied to Noldus's topic in B#4 Veronica, Neytiri, Nani, Dominga, Thais (11/11/15)
I didn't hear ... but it is actually confusing, because how she acted (sitting idle most of the time, then smiling, then starting to be sexy, and dragging time a lot, then putting her dress back at various points in the process and starting over) I would have thought she was on paying private shows. -
New girl Jessica
vlkvlk111 replied to Noldus's topic in B#4 Veronica, Neytiri, Nani, Dominga, Thais (11/11/15)
Still no one found Jessica's site ? You can PM, I promise I'll behave, you might even see more Jessica on free cam -
While I disapprove some of the things I see (the confusion between beeing on RLC and camming), let's not start to call girls with derogatory name. They are not s.... This is an horrible word. As you can see in the relevant threads, many of them come from crappy backgrounds, and if it is what it takes to live their life, so be it. I know there is a moral stigma with working in "adult enterainment" in general but ... let me just tell me a story. I had a friend who worked in the IT business, and for some time, he worked as an IT subcontractor for a business dealing in consumer loans. At the end of the day, he said to me he couldn't look at himself in a mirror. These guys were doing customer profiling, to prey on the poorest of households, making money over vulnerable people already under heavy debt. No one called him derogatory words for his job. No one insulted him. His kind of job is held in high regard in our society. Yet he had a bad impact on real people's lives. These girls are just showing tits ... it is as inocuous as it gets.
-
Just beeing the devil's advocate there : it is hard for RLC to find a good balance. It is not real life, it can't be real life, because there are cameras, and the people know that there are cameras. In scientific experimentation, you learn that the actual observation, like using measuring instruments, can potentially change the natural of physical phenomenon that you want to observe. It's the same here. Theoretically, the only real "real life" voyeur site would be a site where the tenants will not be aware of the fact they are filmed. Which will be oviously immoral, and illegal - criminal. Some sites embrace that fact fully, and offer us porn ; tenants who are here to fuck in front of the cameras, like Voyeur Villa. But I don't think it is what the majority of us want here. On the other end of the spectrum : the life of normal people is boring. Normal people don't party every evening, don't spend all their days naked or in underwear (and people work, have social lives, and go outside, so they do not spent that much time in their apartments or houses either). So you have to draw a balancing line. For the couples, it is a bit different, because, well they are couple, and sex is part of their "ordinary" life. So if they are (like most of the couples on RLC obviously are), a little exhibitionists and not bothered/turned on by the fact that they are viewed. So the balancing between "entertainment" and "reallife" for the viewers is quite natural. But for the Barcelona appartments ... all girls that are either single or not with their BF ... no reason for them to engage in any ... "enteraining" activity, aside for a quick bate under covers, unless they can bring a BF home which has happened but is very rare. So that leads us to "shows", the parties, the massages, the candle lit baths, the lingerie and nudity, and those bates with the covers thrown aside - with the associated incentives in the girl's paycheck at the end of the month. We remember the days of Ilona and Irma (and Anna, K&K ...) fondly, because the girls were great, but also before they managed to have this great balance between the real life, and the liitle bits of entertainment, during which they were so playful and cheerfull that suspension of disbelief kicked in for many of us viewers. The coke-laced orgies of Lola's time kind of blurred the lines (and I believe RLC had nothing to do with the way things unfolded). And after that, I believe RLC does not know what to do and where to lead the barca appartments. They are probably trying very hard, too hard, to spice things up by hiring experienced cam girls, but it may alienate some of their viewers just out of principles, and will backfire pretty hard if the model favoritize their paying viewers instead of the cam caps users (to Jessica's credit, she would have cammed in her room instead of a remote corner because RLC can't manage to have a proper internet in her room, and she gave us our own shows). On the other hand, they took onboard girls who are not willing to do anything beyond the bare minimum of functional nakedness. So yeah, I don't know what the future is. But the firing of Melissa is one of the examples that RLC doesn't have a clue, because if there was a girl who managed that balance, that feat to give us plenty of sexyness for our viewing pleasure, while staying classy, it was her. Whoever decided this, this is professionnal negligence.
