vortios

Thanks, but can you tell which is the novel that I tell? Just to remove it ...

By the way, after friends brought drugs into the house, do not you think that Heidi's stay inside the house can have consequences? She can not be responsible, but her friends have already been marked. Heidi's boy, do it again or not, will be marked by his image with the straw in his hand, or the white bag above the sink ... For me, it's stupid to go to a house full of cameras and have certain behaviors ... but it's my opinion.

It is strange that I arrive with the purchase Nicole, leave two large packages of toilet paper a shopping bag and with the same leaves ... It is also rare and highly objectionable, that every time girls spend less time inside the house. By the way, I criticize these girls, how little they are identified with the RLC project. In B1, I do not think any assumes what their first objective is.

I suppose you have not understood my words, and the problem may be the translation. Real, it is to me, the behavior of people. And I put it ahead, that I assume this is a show and the only thing they offer is entertainment. There is a saying from the older people, who says "Whatever hides, something hides" or as Agatha Christie says: "Conversations are always dangerous if they have something to hide." In the houses of Barcelona, more and more has gone to concealment, manipulation of the scenes and behaviors of the girls (to go into details would be very heavy to explain), perhaps for people who take a little time, sound my words Rare, even incomprehensible, but for you, I think you will know what I am talking about. But focusing on his words ... You say, "What is real to one could be false to another." But I deny the greater, and by my work I face it every day. Reality is what you are ... another thing is that we want to make it up. A murder is a murder, and there is a criminal action in it, then we will be to prove that it was in self-defense, that there were attenuating, whatever you want, but there is an unquestionable truth ... The girls should, in my humble opinion to Barcelona, only for a reason, and it is the fact that they participate in a program of retransmission of cameras live by Internet ... any other reason is spurious. Of course we do not enter the last girls, that their intention is not to entertain those who see RLC, but their own businesses ... and RLC allows it? Of course, from the moment they are there. It's that real, as real as I'm writing it. It seems that it bothers me to talk about Nicole, but when my criticism went to Lima, I do not remember so much "criticism" towards me (and I'm not annoyed by it), just who catches my attention. If I do is critical, or call attention to these facts, it is because I think they deserve special attention from RLC and on our part to say that we do not like it, if that is our opinion. On the other hand, I understand, that who likes not complain, is understandable. But I do not go by the branches ... Jess, of course the sexcam's way of acting is false ... she thinks the company girls get paid because they enjoy it, no. They are paid, because they make the viewer enjoy. Nobody would pay for a serious girl, or not arranged, or who is stupid in the deal ... I've said it before, personally I do not like girls doing sexcam inside the houses ... but that is the way the sexcam girls live, well, I do not know their way of life. In the case of Lima, do you think she is happy dealing with men who pay for her services? Please, no one insults your intelligence ... But it is a way to get easy money ... well yes. Is your life inside the house real? Well, if you say so ... I do not know the intimacy of girls who are engaged in that ... but if you say that so live, you will know more than I do! Of course a normal woman, even a model, does not lead that life, of that if I'm sure. As for Nicole, she exercises as a companion in Moscow to "pay" the studio, well said in a soft, but since I do not think we are not children, we know what he meant. Is your life real ?, well, if it's real to enter a program, go to another country and look for the way that when your time ends in the program, you can stay in that country, that's real ... well real if Is because we are seeing it every day in the development of this girl ... but that it is sold as real? Even as I said at the beginning, I think it is not proceeds within RLC. And just to point out that just like when Vika put her partner inside RLC, criticize the fact a lot and said that it created a dangerous precedent ... Imagine the precedent if Nicole gets papers to stay in Spain? Tomorrow she'll have a bunch of girls knocking on her door because they'll want to page them to stay, just to get papers. Then turning the stay inside the house. Since they will not be in the house so that you and I enjoy some kind of entertainment, but simple girls trying to find a silly boy and money to give them papers ... If that's what some RLC viewer wants to see, I certainly do not. It's real or not ... RLC is what you are. It's not your house or mine. He does not seek that kind of reality. It is much more like a series, where it seems that we see the reality of the life of some girls, but that reality has nothing to do with the reality of millions of women in the world. Nor with the reality of the girls inside the house.

Now I wonder what awaits us entertainment in B2. More training? I do not know if you have seen a fact that struck me as shocking ... Nicole putting the bra in Michelle's room, without taking off the shirt she was wearing ... is a strange behavior, right?

I just asked for your impression, thank you very much for your comments. I assume it's too early yet.

Well, without going into discussion, after what I know, that's real ... this girl is not very real ... And if someone wants me to explain why it is not real a girl who is looking for someone to act for her ... and the difference between her and real cases of girls that are illegal in the European Union, looking for life to get ahead, that Have a really bad time, not being able to eat hot every day, or with miserable jobs ... for me this girl is the least like a normal girl, with a normal life.

I mean, what impression does this new change give you? By the way, Nicole, I think she's still looking to bring her to B2, right?

Is that RLC does not think about you, nor me, nor anyone who pays their monthly fee. Michelle, I knew that when Candy left the room, that was for her ... she would simply have an agreement beforehand. But hey, since I do not pay RLC, to see girls in sexcam, but I would go to other pages, it gives me the same where I do it. What I feel is that we are paying a fee for them to do their business, and that leads me to wonder ... Your sexcam time, is not reflected anywhere, that is, we could ask for damages and damages? In the contract with RLC, it is not reflected that pornographic shows are made, that can not be justified as normal life inside a house. And another, if the cameras premiun, are for exclusive looks of partners who pay a fee to see the girls in those rooms. They are not free access ... as anyone can access these stays by means of other cameras. Does not it seem like a contradiction? Also, because the girls do not broadcast on free access cameras like Jess was doing ... what does RLC have to do with those other pages?

Good morning, how do you see the new girl?

If you call "your guy" to some kind of relationship when it was his first date with the boy, even if that date ends up in bed ... you and I do not speak the same language. As we know she had dates with two other boys, one inside the house and another outside.

I do not think Nicole is close to coming home ... She is in your business. It is a clear case of a girl who has deceived RLC to leave Russia and get some fool papers from her to be able to settle in the country.

Mistake is air conditioning, which is set

A key rings.

There is no one in the B1 house.

Then, when they spend a night out or when they spend a weekend, they will not charge those days, right? And the same would happen to us, they should make a small rebate for not being able to use a house, not because of technical problems, or maintenance, which although questionable, could be reasonable ... But seeing a couch emptied or an empty room, because an RLC participant, no longer interested in being inside the project but doing their own business, that would be logical?

Good night guys, I see that the night has not been very profitable in the halls ... A party at K & K's house, which Heidi's partner, has clouded, or so I'm told ... I do not understand, he gets along very well with Kristy or is he flirting with her? I do not have it very clear. But I think it was not just with Kristy ... In B1, the thing has not gone better ... The house has been worse than a plot ... Lima sleeping, Jess in her room, and Michelle missing ... for this we pay that there are girls in B1? And B2, I see that there are problems ... or maybe they are tired of my messages and are looking at how to put a camera on the balcony ... (kidding, it's to put a little humor in the room) I know that many defend Nicole's attitude, but I'm sorry, as much as I try to look for the positive side, I can not find it. Even staying in the physical alone, I can say that there are and there have been many women with better bodies than Michelle from RLC.

Thanks for the description, I personally stay with B2 and B3 ... It really has been the most I have enjoyed in the house (and really when there was more speculation in the house) But I understand that there are many people who want to see more girls fucking ... surely those that already are will seem few ...

We know today is the last day of Candy at home. Official, the 24 enters another girl in B2. Nicole told it yesterday.

When was that? At what time, more or less?

It's a translation problem ... I said, that it is not reasonable the time of visit of the boy. Do you know a woman who receives at such hours? I at least not. And it was not midnight, but at 2 in the morning.

They spent 5 minutes on the balcony, long enough to clarify many things. That's for those who continue to think that the balcony is only used for smoking.

It's strange that a married girl takes a stranger home, and gets warm and kisses with him, right? At least strange. Meet at a club and invite him to his house ... at midnight? I do not know you, but I've never heard anyone tell me that story. Dating with people starts in public places, not in private homes. True that she puts barriers in certain parts of his approach, notice Michelle's legs with the positions so that the "guy" does not surrender to her above. But that does not explain that he lowered the top of his pajamas, or she on the sofa also kissed him with ardor. I know her pajamas are hot, but the sheer amount of clothing between her and him, when they go to the balcony, is remarkable. You say that nothing happens between them on the balcony, that has as much defense as saying that everything happened. There are no cameras, so all that is said is speculation. If it is true, that after returning from the balcony, they were clear that everything was over. What happened on the balcony? She was carrying her phone, so I get the impression that she would intend to use it. To ask for permission? It is the most widespread hypothesis. After Michelle's night, I do not think RLC, you can let the situation get out of hand again. Candy came out of the room, and it was a surprise to her, personally I did not see the face, but say it could be seen from camera 1, can anyone corroborate it? As far as they knew each other, Candy did not want to greet him. Just passed and salute. Although he was already saying goodbye at that moment, not a halt to stop. By the way, did you see the way they got fired? Did not you see anything strange?

But no case, who is going to be the unfortunate who will believe that what is not available online is going to be later? It is that there is no where to take it.

Good morning to all. Last night was a rather long night, first with Heidi and her half-nakedness at bedtime, everyone was expecting a little party, there was not, or no one told me anything. Nicole's play with her pussy, and subsequent waxing of her English. That if that is to play for nothing. And finally, what you have all talked about the visit of the boy. I would like to contribute things that many have already said, but I think many have not read. First, last night's light failure, I do not think it was caused by RLC, but it is a fault, caused by an excessive consumption of electrical energy, for what seems the floor is not ready. I'm assuming that the same problem has already happened on several occasions, and it's always been the same, until the device has been broken (and as I said last night), it's not easy to replace, but it has another device. It seems that they foreseen, as I am afraid, that they already knew the problem). I say this because the problem was repaired "quickly". Second, the appearance of the boy, as Benflod points out, the boy is not the one who came to visit with the acquaintance of Sia. They are Spanish, and they know neither Russian nor Ukrainian. If you remember, Michelle's problem with them is that she does not speak fluent English. With this boy he was communicating in Russian or Ukrainian. Remember that I do not distinguish one language from another. Third, when the boy appeared, I did not see him, I think the boy, at least for a few minutes, but more time on the floor, since I did not see the boy take off his two jackets, one of leather and one woolen. If anyone can point to that, it would be a good contribution. Because he, some friends, have been comparing the images of him and the images of the mobile where the face of the supposed "husband" of Michel, the famous "flaccid penis" appears, and neither does the same person. For those who do not remember it, in the first days in B2, Michelle let the screen of the phone be seen, and they hunted to her husband masturbating. Fourth, I am convinced that the boy if he wanted to fuck Michelle, but I took it off, several times (he was very hot), I guess she would not be less (I never bet against a woman, because we are deceived very easily). In fact, she begins to undress and lower her pajamas, the clock marked 2:43:37, and did that "look but not touch". The games continued, she went to the kitchen for a couple of oranges, and returned, until at 2:58 she decides to go out on the balcony with the phone, and without tobacco. She comes back in less than a minute, says something and goes out again. He initially sits, but at 3:00, he receives a message and as a spring puts on his jackets and goes out to the balcony with her. They do not re-enter until 3:05, so they are on the balcony 5 min ... but 5 minutes from 3:00 in the morning! With the cold that you must do there, imagine, the cold of the dawn, like 8 ºC and next to the sea ... She never shows a cigar, a cigarette lighter, or a packet of tabacco, so I assume that in those 5 minutes she did not smoke. Two minutes after she returned to the classroom, Candy went to the bathroom, she just saw them talking and sitting on the couch. I think that was the moment that gave the touch of "The party is over" because they just said goodbye. At 3:09:54 she shut the door and went to the couch to write messages. True or not, the farewell was not the normal of two lovers. Maybe because the cameras were in front? I do not know. Perhaps some questions could be answered if he came home before or after the house was out of maintenance. But that creates another doubt, the girls know when the house is in maintenance and when not, if the boy was before, then they did not notify Michell? The truth is that I doubt that he was before. Because that fault is arranged in person, there had to go and make the physical change of the device. That is not arranged remotely. It would also be interesting to know if anyone saw him enter. Well, I hope some of you have been interesting and effective description, especially for those who did not.