Nicholas

Oh, well apparently that may be another one of her friends either back in her original homeland, or there where she is now. To be honest, I'm really not sure.

Which Cristina are you referring to my feline friend ?

I'm not sure. Which Cristina may you be referring to my feline friend ?

The appearance of intent of sensual activities that could potentially progress further are mostly fallacies that are ploy's e. Done to try to increase cam number hits and viewer time accumulation. They know by doing such things, there will be an appearance in the thumbs of there perhaps being something more occurring there, or on the verge of occurring there, and that it will attract others to tune in to live streams and/or replays of the time. There's a reason behind it, and they certainly don't do such things such as that for nothing or for the hell of it, or merely just because they are friends, as often as they have. A number of such times have occurred after several days or more of what would have been considered to a number of observers or viewers as little to no occasions of any significant interest having occurred there.

It appears that Little Bo Peep is not currently at the residence and Little Red Riding Hood is. Although it's not surprising since that has been shown to be the norm for quite awhile now there. Little Bo Peep may be out tending those sheep again. It will also not be surprising if Litte Red Riding Hood gets ready and leaves sometime soon for another visit to grandmas house as well.

I'm not trying to argue anything there kiko. There is no fact that proves that exhibitionism is to be considered a form of porn. Only opinions of leaning one way or the other concerning the matter. But I'm definitely done debating the matter.

That's some more funny assed stuff pyle. Keep it up, you'll be bucking for promotion soon private. I think Corporal Slater may be even rooting for you.

I'm actually not trying to prove anything. Just here stating my opinion like everyone else. As an old saying goes...opinions are like assholes...everyone has them. Some can be considered right, and some can be considered wrong. Some don't try to give explanations of their beliefs and opinions or care to, and some do.

No, she is not, and I talk in no circles other than perhaps to those that have trouble's with following along or comprehension. You were the one presenting a question about a minority as if it were ever mentioned the way you presented it when in fact it never was. So who is it that actually talks in circles for no reason....I believe that might be you.

I've mentioned nothing about anything such as your hypothetical scenario. I mentioned what would be very likely as to what a majority of people if asked of their opinions on as to whether they considered exhibitionism to be considered the same as what is considered as mainstream porn if a substantial poll was taken, and that it's very likely a majority of answers would be no. So, I guess that would mean the answer to your hypothetical scenario would be just the opposite, because it's very likely that a minority would say yes, that their opinion was that exhibitionism was a form of porn.

It's still exhibitionism no matter how it's construed. It's good that you realize there is no similiarity, as in that being that exhibitionism is what it is. The same can be said about you and a few others and obviously anyone can believe what they want even if it's not right. But by all means, as you'll believe what you want, I will certainly believe what I want as well.

Nude beaches attract exhibitionists. Exhibitionists practice exhibitionism. Exhibitionism for the most part would be considered by a majority of those asked if to be a form of pornography, they would very likely answer no. Therefore your narrative of claiming it to be a form of pornography is flawed, except other than those that may agree with that mindset which would likely be quite in a minority of those asked if any substantial poll was taken on the matter. So you are the one trying to fit a narrative. I'm tired of discussing the subject, but you are most certainly welcome to carry on which everyone knows you will try to do. So, have fun.

No, I'm done discussing about it for now my friend.

I'm not spinning anything. Like I said, regardless of any dictionaries terminology definitons, exhibitionism for the most part is considered by a majority of people if asked if they thought it was the same as mainstream porn, most answers would be no and the same would be concerning voyeurism. Anyone who have ever checked out actual porn sites know they will put anything they can on there to attract viewers. But as jimbo, I, and others believe, and have alluded to, they are not the same. Of course your opinion is certainly yours to believe what you want to as are others as well. Also, like I mentioned earlier as well, I suppose those exhibitionists who visit nude beaches forms of exhibitionism is to be considered pornography in that mindset, when in reality, it is not.

Lol. Now that's some funny assed stuff there I have to admit private pyle ! 😂

Think so huh...obviously you haven't come to any realization of who suggests the direction of those scenarios private pyle. I'll give you a hint....it may be Little Bo Peep and not Little Red Riding Hood. But it did appear that there were some attempts made to accrue some cam numbers. 😉

Wrong again private pyle. Get down and give me a 100, on the double ! Now you've earned yourself a week of latrine duty on top of the rest as well !

Regardless of how it is spun or what may be printed in dictionaries as far as any definitions may go, as jimbo alluded to, it's quite likely that a majority of people without referring to or resorting to any dictionaries definitions of terminology, would think that exhibitionism is just people who do not mind showing most of thenselves, and that even there are some who don't mind showing all of themselves. Those that think in that mindset, would likely not think of or believe of exhibitionism as being the same as porn. Even when considering any exhibitionists who don't mind showing all of themselves, it's not the same as likely what a majority believe to be as is mainstream pornography. Most people consider pornography as being what is associated with what is considered to be those that act in, to manufacture what is considered by a majority as mainstream pornography. Neither exhibitionism, nor voyeurism should be considered in any context of what is considered to be mainstream pornography and not even close. When exhibitionists go to nude beaches, is that type of exhibitionism to be considered a form of pornography.....the answer is NO.

Lol. I think I may get your meaning here Sergio.

Well of course not. Ask yourself this as well, "Would I try to take my family with me, be it kids, grandkids, etc. to an adult themed or couples only resort if there were any way I could, where whatever occurs is not under any lenses of any cams" ? Wait a minute, I already know the answer to that one. It would be a definite NO. But apparently, those types of situations and people involved in such would be considered porn and porn actors or actresses as well by those who believe that voyeur sites and participants should be considered as such.

I edited my post and added a few comments like some of the same situations occur at adult themed and couples only resorts that occur not under any lense of any camera, but to those of you with such opinions, you all probably consider that to be porn also, but not before you responded but it doesn't really matter.

Well HF, I do happen to not agree with you or any others who may have such opinions. Porn is porn, that being people who choose to make films while having sex to get paid for it. Exhibitionists who choose to live their lives the way they choose to is not the same, even if any of it involves them having sex while being observed by others considered voyeurs. That actually occurs in life at adult or couples only resorts where nobody is ever under any lense of any camera. So it's not the same, but for those of you who choose to believe so, that is certainly you all's prerogatives and opinions. But for those of you all with such opinions, you probably would consider that as being porn also even though in reality, it most definitely is not.

Koala changed locations. He is now sitting out on the living room 🛋 watching the two sexy women friends doing some cleaning chores. 👧 👩....👀 🐨 Teddy 🐻 is now sitting in the 🛏 waiting. Meow. 😸

That's basically what I mentioned towards the end of my previous post.

Bingo ! Well put Van ! I will add that as far as any considerations being given to acceptable types of free expression here, the insinuations of some calling or classifying some of the women there as whores should not be considered acceptable free expression here imo, (which I believe violates the rules of the forum here by way of disparaging and insulting the individual rlc participants there who have been insinuated as to being such), other than that, I for one, certainly do agree with the rest of your comments ! 👌