Nicholas

I'm actually not trying to prove anything. Just here stating my opinion like everyone else. As an old saying goes...opinions are like assholes...everyone has them. Some can be considered right, and some can be considered wrong. Some don't try to give explanations of their beliefs and opinions or care to, and some do.

No, she is not, and I talk in no circles other than perhaps to those that have trouble's with following along or comprehension. You were the one presenting a question about a minority as if it were ever mentioned the way you presented it when in fact it never was. So who is it that actually talks in circles for no reason....I believe that might be you.

I've mentioned nothing about anything such as your hypothetical scenario. I mentioned what would be very likely as to what a majority of people if asked of their opinions on as to whether they considered exhibitionism to be considered the same as what is considered as mainstream porn if a substantial poll was taken, and that it's very likely a majority of answers would be no. So, I guess that would mean the answer to your hypothetical scenario would be just the opposite, because it's very likely that a minority would say yes, that their opinion was that exhibitionism was a form of porn.

It's still exhibitionism no matter how it's construed. It's good that you realize there is no similiarity, as in that being that exhibitionism is what it is. The same can be said about you and a few others and obviously anyone can believe what they want even if it's not right. But by all means, as you'll believe what you want, I will certainly believe what I want as well.

Nude beaches attract exhibitionists. Exhibitionists practice exhibitionism. Exhibitionism for the most part would be considered by a majority of those asked if to be a form of pornography, they would very likely answer no. Therefore your narrative of claiming it to be a form of pornography is flawed, except other than those that may agree with that mindset which would likely be quite in a minority of those asked if any substantial poll was taken on the matter. So you are the one trying to fit a narrative. I'm tired of discussing the subject, but you are most certainly welcome to carry on which everyone knows you will try to do. So, have fun.

No, I'm done discussing about it for now my friend.

I'm not spinning anything. Like I said, regardless of any dictionaries terminology definitons, exhibitionism for the most part is considered by a majority of people if asked if they thought it was the same as mainstream porn, most answers would be no and the same would be concerning voyeurism. Anyone who have ever checked out actual porn sites know they will put anything they can on there to attract viewers. But as jimbo, I, and others believe, and have alluded to, they are not the same. Of course your opinion is certainly yours to believe what you want to as are others as well. Also, like I mentioned earlier as well, I suppose those exhibitionists who visit nude beaches forms of exhibitionism is to be considered pornography in that mindset, when in reality, it is not.

Lol. Now that's some funny assed stuff there I have to admit private pyle ! 😂

Think so huh...obviously you haven't come to any realization of who suggests the direction of those scenarios private pyle. I'll give you a hint....it may be Little Bo Peep and not Little Red Riding Hood. But it did appear that there were some attempts made to accrue some cam numbers. 😉

Wrong again private pyle. Get down and give me a 100, on the double ! Now you've earned yourself a week of latrine duty on top of the rest as well !

Regardless of how it is spun or what may be printed in dictionaries as far as any definitions may go, as jimbo alluded to, it's quite likely that a majority of people without referring to or resorting to any dictionaries definitions of terminology, would think that exhibitionism is just people who do not mind showing most of thenselves, and that even there are some who don't mind showing all of themselves. Those that think in that mindset, would likely not think of or believe of exhibitionism as being the same as porn. Even when considering any exhibitionists who don't mind showing all of themselves, it's not the same as likely what a majority believe to be as is mainstream pornography. Most people consider pornography as being what is associated with what is considered to be those that act in, to manufacture what is considered by a majority as mainstream pornography. Neither exhibitionism, nor voyeurism should be considered in any context of what is considered to be mainstream pornography and not even close. When exhibitionists go to nude beaches, is that type of exhibitionism to be considered a form of pornography.....the answer is NO.

Lol. I think I may get your meaning here Sergio.

Well of course not. Ask yourself this as well, "Would I try to take my family with me, be it kids, grandkids, etc. to an adult themed or couples only resort if there were any way I could, where whatever occurs is not under any lenses of any cams" ? Wait a minute, I already know the answer to that one. It would be a definite NO. But apparently, those types of situations and people involved in such would be considered porn and porn actors or actresses as well by those who believe that voyeur sites and participants should be considered as such.

I edited my post and added a few comments like some of the same situations occur at adult themed and couples only resorts that occur not under any lense of any camera, but to those of you with such opinions, you all probably consider that to be porn also, but not before you responded but it doesn't really matter.

Well HF, I do happen to not agree with you or any others who may have such opinions. Porn is porn, that being people who choose to make films while having sex to get paid for it. Exhibitionists who choose to live their lives the way they choose to is not the same, even if any of it involves them having sex while being observed by others considered voyeurs. That actually occurs in life at adult or couples only resorts where nobody is ever under any lense of any camera. So it's not the same, but for those of you who choose to believe so, that is certainly you all's prerogatives and opinions. But for those of you all with such opinions, you probably would consider that as being porn also even though in reality, it most definitely is not.

Koala changed locations. He is now sitting out on the living room 🛋 watching the two sexy women friends doing some cleaning chores. 👧 👩....👀 🐨 Teddy 🐻 is now sitting in the 🛏 waiting. Meow. 😸

That's basically what I mentioned towards the end of my previous post.

Bingo ! Well put Van ! I will add that as far as any considerations being given to acceptable types of free expression here, the insinuations of some calling or classifying some of the women there as whores should not be considered acceptable free expression here imo, (which I believe violates the rules of the forum here by way of disparaging and insulting the individual rlc participants there who have been insinuated as to being such), other than that, I for one, certainly do agree with the rest of your comments ! 👌

Some good points made marco. Of course there are those who have tunnel vision or narrow mindedness enough on certain matters in life, and evidently one being as to what actually is, or should be considered to be, as to whether or not any certain individuals should be considered porn actors or actresses simply because of there being ways at times to observe when some of those individuals may be involved in sexual situations or activities. Which the same individuals also consider that a voyeur site such as rlc should be considered a porn site as well because of the same. It would be fair to believe that some of the same individuals who believe those things, also probably believe that movies rated PG should actually be rated R, and that movies rated R should actually be rated X, and that movies rated only X should really be rated XX or XXX.

No...obviously your math skills are in need of improvement. You basically presented what should be considered a really simple mathematical equation. By you saying take a girl who may have been in a business for 10 years and shot 300 movies during that time, the mathematical equation for that is simply the total number of movies divided by the total amount of time to determine how many movies played in each years time. That mathematical equation is therefore 300 (total amount of movies played in), divided by 10 (total amount of time in years of achieving playing in 300 movies). To sum it up, that would simply be 300 divided by 10 which equates to 30. There being 12 months in a year would have had nothing to do in figuring the total amount of movie clips per year played in over the total 10 year period you presented. So any way you choose to spin it, the equation to such a hypothetical situation still is nothing more than 300 divided by 10 which equals 30.

Well HF, certainly everyone is entitled to their own opinions on various matters in life, just as you and I are as well. Although that may be your opinion of which mine happens to be quite different on the matter, since I happen to not agree with you or private pyle on the matter, you can join private pyle in moving 25 piles of stones over 25 feet, and then moving them back to the original spots, and then you can join him on kp mess duty for the next 3 days as well. Oh, and by the way HF, 10 goes into 300 thirty times, not 12. That would be the number 30. That has earned you some extra barracks cleaning duty for the next 3 days as well.

Oh really ? Well other than the fact that I've never had any reason to, or thought of for that matter going anywhere to any place such as Walmart or anywhere similar and logging onto a wifi there and then trying to access something such as rlc, considering that they, like so many others, have joined the politically correct bleeding heart liberal band wagon of bullshit, it would not surprise me.

Make that 100 and mess duty for the next 3 days private pyle !

I enjoy reading alot of what you have to say and agree with you at times, but you're absolutely wrong again private pyle ! Get down and give me 50 on the double !

First of all...rlc was not created with any intentions of such, nor should it yet be overall considered as such. None of the couple participants do anything that is considered as such and is only considered as living their lives as normal people. Second of all...although there may at times be a little more sexual activity with the roommates and singles participants, there is certainly never enough that would put them in such a category. Anyone who may think so, may be in need of phsychological therapy. Third of all...although there are around half of the gov and cov participants that seem to be pretty active as far as any sexual activity goes, they are not being compensated for doing any of it, but are being so for living in certain residences somewhere. Also, it should be considered that what applies to the roommates and singles participants, should also apply to the other half of the gov and cov participants. Regardless of which residence category the participants are in, none of them are compensated for anything other than living in certain residences somewhere. It would be the same if none of them ever were involved in any sexual activity. Although if that were the case, the interest in such a site would likely decline substantially which would likely in turn have an overall affect on how much longer such a site would last, and over half of the participants realize that, and that such a scenario would have an overall affect on how they are currently able to live. But being involved in any sexual activity every now and then like some are...and fairly often like other's are...is certainly not like anyone being involved in sexual activities everyday which is what people on pornsites do. So RLC being considered a pornsite...not hardly, not to mention but also and perhaps more importantly, is the fact that because of such, that most nearly all of the women there should not be thought of or categorized as you did.