Jump to content

Alladino

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,404

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

  • Points

    1,205 [ Donate ]

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Alladino

  1. Alladino
    The expectation should never have been that straight girls pretend to be sexually interested in each other. That's always been one of RLC's big problems in the GOV apartments, that they've gone to this cheap trick and that's why everything has become so artificial and fake. It would be much more important to see more of the girls' real relationships. So the in case of hertero girls guys with whom they have sex. GOV lacks visitors above all. BTW, with a good part of the girls you don't see any masturbations. Either because they go to the bathroom, or because they just pretend and do not really do anything.
  2. Alladino
    Nothing is more silly than two straight girls pretending to be lesbians.
  3. Alladino
    The two are unfortunately just another example of how the obsession of some here with this pseudo lesbian bullshit, and RLC's willingness to follow through on it, destroys the reality of RLC. It's just sad how the girls make clowns of themselves here for the cameras. Especially for people who have seen the two in the roomate apartment concept together with the other angels and actual visitors living a real life there.
  4. Alladino
    I think the twins have had more than enough chances. They will never really participate in the project, but will always be a major roadblock.
  5. Alladino
  6. Alladino
    RLC is not exactly known for quickly announcing the departure of residents. I find all the rumors interesting. 🙂 Ultimately, it's best to just wait and see what RLC is doing and maybe to cancel the subscription as a precaution. 🤣
  7. Alladino
    Photoshoot?!? 🤣 Why not just say what it is: The typical bullshit show on prime time. It is just a cam show. 😐
  8. Alladino
    How can you hate someone you don't know? I think people are disappointed because RLC has once again taken a step backwards. It would have been great to see a new young and good looking couple that would really bring life to this apartment. Instead, there's just a guy who is playing video games alone with only a very few visits from a girl that obviously doesn't live there at all but is lists as a resident by RLC. I think especially the people who already have a lot of experience with RLC recognize quite quickly when an apartment will fail. This is never a 100% prediction, but I think you can see pretty well that something is wrong in this cast. There is still a small chance that this will turn around again, but somehow I don't really believe in it. It would probably be better if the people who do the casting at RLC go back to work and try to do a better job next time.
  9. Alladino
    If he has other girls, he will probably be fucking them somewhere else. This is RLC, as in GOV the "residents" are used to doing just the bare minimum.
  10. Alladino
    I think it is important to realize that presence is not enough to be considered real participation in the project. The fact that some people think RLC should make sure to only include girls in the cast who are actually participating in the project, is not automatically a "don't like them". Even if RLC had the most sympathetic and best-looking girl in the world in the cast, I think it's still appropriate to expect that she really lives out her private life in front of the camera and doesn't just kill time as a freeloader.
  11. Alladino
    The whole idea of RLC is to provide an insight into private life of other people. For this purpose, RLC should have residents in the cast who are actually prepared to really live in these apatments and not hide their private lives from the camera. I am aware that some idealize these girls, but you shouldn't let yourself be fooled either. Just think about what RLC could actually be if all the residents would actually be in the project for real.
  12. Alladino
    DJ Alladino is back. 😁
  13. Alladino
    I did not say that, rather I think that the GOV concept is bad also for other reasons than the unrealistic sex life in relation to real life. However, sex life is a really good indicator because it is something that is definitely part of private life and not something that happens in private life as well as in public life, like reading a book, for example.
  14. Alladino
    Shows are the opposite of real life. If the girls want to act like they are in chaturbate, they should just go to chaturbate. Especially the pseudo lesbian shows are really just stupid. Please do not forget that RLC has already lost many of its spectators. The content has become really bad, because reality is missing.
  15. Alladino
    Now I understand your logic failure. 🙂 Of course, everyone has the right to keep their private life private. The best way to do this is not to move into an apartment that is full of cameras that are broadcast to the internet. 🤣 Again. Please, keep in mind, the concept of RLC is to show the private life of the residents. If the girls hide their private lives (especially their sex lives) from the cameras, the girls and therefore RLC are not following the motto: "THE PRIVATE LIFE OF OTHER PEOPLE". The right decision now would be for the girls to leave the project, in which they are not really participating anyway. Again: RLC should look for girls who really want to participate in the project.
  16. Alladino
    I think, You're fooling yourself. It is a pity that you simply ignore my arguments. It is very important that when the girls' self-censorship goes so far that you can no longer speak of a private life, we should no longer speak of a private life. Sex is really a good indicator, because it is really something private that you would not see otherwise. The fact that many girls in GOV never become sexually active there, or don't even masturbate, is quite clearly a sign that they don't really participate. It doesn't help if they read a book as an alternative. 🤣
  17. Alladino
    That is exactly the problem. RLC is lying through its teeth in its own FAQ when the write "People you see online are not actors, they are real people living their routine lives in apartments equipped with video cameras. There are no scenarios, no operators, video editing or censorship - just 24/7 life as it is.". This motton matched well the good old RLC, but today, especially in GOV, there is unfortunately very little of real life left. In GOV, there are girls who literally stick their genitals into the camera for hours. This is completely unrealistic and is another sign of how bad the quality of RLC has become. The girls would never do that if there were no cameras. However, this is not the only problem with GOV. As I said, for many here it is quite obvious that the girls do not really live in these apartments. I think you can see that especially well in the fact that many of the girls there do not have a normal sexual life in front of the camera. The girls are there for months and absolutely nothing happens. This is completely unrealistic. Please do not forget that the girls are young, healthy and mostly good-looking. They have a sexual life. The reason that you don't see anything or almost nothing of this in GOV is that the girls don't really participate in the project. Again, I don't think the view into the private life of the girls is a bonus, this is the content that RLC intended. Important would be, that RLC also has girls in the cast, who really participate according to their motto and not just wait for the time to pass and then collect the money without really participating.
  18. Alladino
    It is your opinion that they misunderstand. I, for example, think you got the concept of the project wrong. If you knew the good old RLC, you would know that RLC once lived up to their motto much better and have since lost much of their quality. The fact that they have failed to change their motto means that people rightly continue to expect real life content. As if the residents would suddenly lose their sexual drive while traveling. Also, this is not like a normal vacation. Most girls are there for months. Who really believes that the girls do not have sex, is really quite naive. No, the problem is that the sex with many of the girls takes place only or almost only off camera.
  19. Alladino
    I totally agree with you, sex alone is not enough either. In the couple apartments are a lot more real guests, sometimes even the families. This is not to be seen with most girls in GOV or very rare. It is a major weakness of the GOV concept, because the girls are like ripped out of their actual lives. Nevertheless, the sexual life is part of the private life. In my opinion it is the most important part for a site like RLC, because it is the most exciting for the voyeur. That in GOV are so many girls who have no or almost no sex, or if so, often only as this unrealistic sex show events, is simply not "THE PRIVATE LIFE OF OTHER PEOPLE".
  20. Alladino
    There is obviously more to this issue than your opinion. I think at least that such a statement as "THE PRIVATE LIFE OF OTHER PEOPLE", is not fulfilled if the residents simply live out everything private somewhere else. It makes no sense to have girls in the cast who do nothing for months and live in these apartments as if they were nuns. Although I strongly believe that even nuns have more sex than some of the girls in the GOV apartments. 😂 Anyway, even if you're right, which I don't think you are, it's still just boring for a voyeur with so many girls doing almost nothing. Why not just bring girls into the cast who really live in these apartments. Not like these bullshit show girls, but really live there normally (including their sexual life).
  21. Alladino
    Chaturbate is a cam show site and not a voyeur site with an insight into real life. I hate these kind of sites. The bullshit shows, e.g. the pseudo lesbian shows are also a big mistake in my opinion. But that is a completely different topic.
  22. Alladino
    You can't sell the actual content as a bonus. Bonus is something that goes beyond the actual content. Again. The content is the look into the private lives of the residents. If this is not given, because the residents deliberately keep their sexual life away from the apartment, then this is less than the intended content, because there is no longer any insight into the private life. What I don't understand is why we can't agree that it would be better to just replace the do nothing girls with girls who are really involved in the project.
  23. Alladino
    Sorry, I do not share your opinion. RLC describes itself as a site that gives an insight into the private lives of residents. Real life is not a bonus, but the intended content. To believe that they just don't have sex and don't even masturbate is naive. As I said, these are young girls, healthy and good-looking. It is very obvious that some of the girls just have their sex off camera only. That is an issue and RLC should try to find girls actually ready to be a part in the project. It doesn't have to be the do notning girls.
  24. Alladino
    We can also use our common sense and take into account that we are not at a court hearing here. Can't you see why it's a problem on a voyeur site like RLC when so many girls in GOV despite months long stay do nothing or almost nothing sexual that the cameras see. The girls are young, healthy, mostly good looking, they will surely have a sexual life.
  25. Alladino
    Now don't twist my words. I was clearly talking about the fact that there are many girls in GOV who never or almost never do anything during the months they are there. I have always said that patience is part of being a voyeur. Only if the general mindset of a girl is that she censors her private life out of the apartment, then you can wait forever because nothing will ever happen. That is the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...