Jump to content
*** New Software Coming Soon! Please Check for Important Information in the Read Me Section ***

Alladino

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,602

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

  • Points

    1,925 [ Donate ]

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Alladino

  1. Alladino
    - triple post - sorry
  2. Alladino
    - triple post -
  3. Alladino
    Honestly, not that much. I suspect that RLC is aware that they would disappoint many viewers if there were no party at all, but at the moment I think it's likely that several of the girls will bail and party somewhere else. A real party, where there's not just a show, but also a good atmosphere and real guests, etc., is a bit unlikely this year, i think.
  4. Alladino
    Fair.
  5. Alladino
    Please, let's be realistic. Many things are possible, but the probability of a dildo sales event is virtually zero. It's just totally ridiculous. The simplest solution is often the right one. The girls meet up with guys, maybe even some who were at the party, and have fun away from the camera. This is just one possibility among many, but I would estimate the probability of this scenario (or something very close to it) to be well over 50%, and that should be clear to everyone here. The point is, the girls are sexually active, just not in front of the camera.
  6. Alladino
    What a pointless and reality-defying argument. Just think about it:
  7. Alladino
    Don't get me wrong, I would love to see the two of them actually participate in the project, but I'm extremely skeptical about that happening. The pattern is just too obvious, and unfortunately there were very often girls on RLC who only reap the benefits without really giving anything back. Liora and Kaya fit this pattern.
  8. Alladino
    I accept that it's not my decision, but I will definitely not respect this bad joke. I really think RLC needs to try harder to find truly participating residents and get rid of the freeloader girls as quickly as possible.
  9. Alladino
    I very much doubt that the off-camera girls (like Liora, Kaya, etc.) will suddenly start doing something within sight of the cameras.
  10. Alladino
    Unfortunately, I'm not so sure that they really understood the problem. There is a strange mix of residents where a lot happens, and those where almost or actually nothing happens at all. And to be honest, I currently have zero interest in residents or apartments where little to nothing happens. I would have liked to see a few more interesting residents, especially in the couple apartments. Instead, Venera & Lion leave and RLC replaces them with people like Vega & Rex. A couple who were already far too old when they joined the project, unsympathetic, not good-looking, and then also mentally ill. Then it would be better to just close the apartment than waste money on people like that. In general, I thnik, RLC needs to do a major clean-up of the couple apartments and replace staff with sympathetic younger and, above all, more active people. But I don't really see any of that. Anyway, What particularly surprises me is how carelessly RLC is handling the Barcelona apartments. They seem to have spent all their resources on this XLife nonsense, so now they have two virtually dead apartments that they somehow don't want to take offline. Of course, I'm curious to see if RLC will manage to pull it off again, and some apartments are doing surprisingly well (Adeline & Markus for example), but I don't think RLC is seriously working on improvements.
  11. Alladino
    That's a really interesting idea, I hadn't thought of that at all. It's definitely possible, and I would also believe RLC or the girls capable of something like that. At the same time, however, it must also be said that the majority of viewers probably didn't even notice this argument. All they see is that interaction in the villas will now decline. Also considering that B1 and B2 are basically dead, it's looking really bad for an RLC New Year's party this year.
  12. Alladino
    At least the couple makes a pleasant impression and looks good. The rest remains to be seen. In general, RLC needs a breath of fresh air more than ever. Whether it's the couple apartments or Barcelona, there's a lot missing. Adeline & Markus are currently one of the few apartments that I still enjoy watching without reservation. It's one of the increasingly fewer apartments that keeps me paying for RLC.
  13. Alladino
    I really hope RLC has a few more new additions planned. If people are already arguing on behalf of the girls here, then there's clearly not enough going on. BTW, I always find it quite interesting what goes on between the residents, but in the rarest of cases (e.g., when it gets violent) does it make sense to take sides. Just watch as neutral as possible. All should just have fun watching. It is a voyeur page.
  14. Alladino
    I just read through some of the other comments here. It really looks like the argument between two girls is being continued here by some people on their behalf, if I understand correctly?
  15. Alladino
    Yep, I see the problem too. I think it has a lot to do with how much money they are willing to spend. At the same time, however, it must also be said that they waste a lot of money where it probably doesn't really do much good (e.g., Vega and Rex, Linda and Tibor, etc.). I also think that XLife was a complete waste of money. I just don't understand these two sites that obviously operate under the same roof. The money would have been better spent on improving RLC. Quality over quantity, and not losing sight of what is essentially the biggest attraction.
  16. Alladino
    Of course, it's her decision. I have never said otherwise, and moreover, I would find it horrible if it were not so. My point is not to get girls to do something they don't want to do. I think RLC should make more of an effort to find girls who are genuinely willing in participating in the project. That's a big difference. Also, I do not think that she is doing nothing at all. She just keep it away from camera.
  17. Alladino
    Your opinion did not surprise me, only your attempt to refute my conclusions without any real arguments. You're doing it again with this post, by the way. For example, the male residents have no place in this discussion because, at least as far as I have seen, virtually all of them were sexually active in front of the camera. Disclaimer: I don't know about Vega and Rex apartments because I don't pay attention to them. Also, It is not an argument that other apartments do not have the resident hidding from the camera issue. Rather, I would say that there are in sum so many girls who have no problem showing their sex lives on camera that RLC should strive to replace freeloaders as quickly as possible with girls who are genuinely involved in the project. Let's be honest, if a girl buys three sex toys at once, for example, the probability that she will never use them is ridiculously low. The problem is then quite obvious: she joined the project even though she is not really prepared to live out her private life in front of the camera. I think RLC should pay more attention to ensuring that residents don't simply exploit the system as freeloaders.
  18. Alladino
    What I am describing are quite easy to understand concepts, and I am truly surprised at how superficially you are trying to refute them. At least think a bit about what you're writing here: " because we literally pay to watch the apartments whilst they are online". You can't be so incredibly naive as to believe that just because "pay RLC ... to watch the apartments" it's technically correct, it even begins to explain why people spend money on RLC. If that's enough for you, I'll gladly put a camera in a corner of my basement that I don't need right now, and you can pay to stare at the wall 24/7. No, the world isn't that simple, and if you really want to make a point here, it doesn't help to simply ignore essential aspects of the problem. Sexual activity is part of private life and i think, it is reasonable to expect that this is not be hidden from the camera. Anyway, We don't know what's in the contracts, and to be honest, I don't really care. My point is simply that I find it disappointing when a girl hides her sex life from the camera. I expect exactly the opposite from RLC. The fact that it can work is evident from all the residents who are genuinely involved in the project. So I think RLC should be stricter and kick freeloaders out of the project and find girls who are really comfortable in front of the cameras.
  19. Alladino
    The world can be quite simple. If you're camera-shy, like me, for example, you don't go into an apartment full of cameras that broadcast live on the internet. But if on the other hanb you decide to live in an apartment that announced on there site head 'The private lives of other people...', have usually at least three cameras pointed at each bed, then it's pretty obvious what the point is. The girls can't be so naive as to misunderstand this and fail to recognize what the majority of viewers will reasonably expect. Therefore, When a girl hides her sex life from the camera, it's only natural that people are disappointed and express negative opinions about it. That's what happens, when a freeloader is called out for what they are. And I'm certainly not going to celebrate this as some kind of freedom initiative. If the girls don't want to participate, they should be honest about it and leave the project. I wouldn't mind that, and I can completely understand that there are people, like me, who don't want to be sexually active in front of a camera, even for money. Not to mention that no one would pay for it if I did change my mind about it. ;) I think the problem lies with RLC, because we don't pay the girls, we pay RLC. If they have many vacant rooms and some of the girls are obviously not really participating in the project, then this obviously reflects negatively on them. And that's also something we can talk about here. But that shouldn't distract from the fact that some girls obviously know exactly what is expected of them and want to trick the system by enjoying the advantages but avoiding the disadvantages. Just as the girls have the freedom to decide what they do (or, unfortunately, don't do), it is our freedom to write about it and be disappointed.
  20. Alladino
    There is a big difference between "they should be home all the time and should be naked all the time and make sexual content just because you WANT them too" and the in my opinion reasonable expection that a resident should not deliberately hide sexual acts from the camera. This discussion has come up often in the past, and I have never understood people with your point of view because they ignore the obvious. Without sexual content, a site like RLC would not survive. However, that doesn't mean that this is all that matters. Rather, I think that it is realism, i.e. real relationships, real life, etc., that makes this site interesting. It's about seeing something genuine. Not something that is so reduced that virtually only an emotionless pseudo-world remains. One final point is that RLC has always had the problem that some girls are just freeloaders, pretending to participate but not really fully involved in the project. This has varying effects, ranging from nothing sexual happening in front of the camera to the camera being disrupted by specially arranged lights, hiding under bed covers, faking orgasms during masturbation, etc. This is not fun to watch, as it is quite obvious that these girls are trying to fool the viewer. This one, where girls buy a bunch of dildos, arrange them nicely so that the camera can see them, but then nothing ever happens, plays into this direction. But one thing must be said. Currently, the two villas, along with perhaps 4-5 other apartments, are essentially the core of RLC. They could shut down everything else, and hardly anyone would notice the difference. It's especially unfortunate that B1 and B2 are so dead during the holidays.
  21. Alladino
    Yes, currently B1 and B2 are virtually non-existent. Four girls are missing in the cast, and the girls who should actually be there are boring, arguing, or not present. It's sad.
  22. Alladino
    I have no idea what RLC was thinking. They are basically the exact opposite of what RLC needs and just take up space. What a load of crap.
  23. Alladino
    Yes, that was my thought too. If the lights had been placed further apart, which is better for shadow-free lighting anyway, you would have had a completely unobstructed view. But seriously, they know why they placed the lights exactly there. It is a real shame. So much potential, and yet somehow a waste. Now I'm curious to see what Liora will do with her new plastic toy. But somehow I think we'll see even less. If we seen anything at all.
  24. Alladino
    Is there a specific reason why the two of them still live together in B1? I mean, B2 is practically empty all the time.
  25. Alladino
    It doesn't matter now. Now there are 7 guys (probably all gay) partying downstairs while all the female guests have left. That's what I call the worst possible outcome. And no one seems to be really concerned about noise pollution. So, i guess. The girls could have stayed longer, couldn't they? What a shame.
×
×
  • Create New...