Jump to content

Alladino

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,404

  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

  • Points

    1,205 [ Donate ]

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Alladino

  1. Alladino
    In my opinion, the added value of the RLCs must be that the activities are actually desired by the residents and are not done as work. That is what brings life into the apartment and what is so severely lacking in B2 at the moment. In other words, where is normal sex? At the moment, especially in B2, it looks like hardly anything is happening, and in between there a few very strange bullshit show events that interrupt the nothing, but are not part of life. I, at least, find these show events extremely unfitting and, on top of that, boring, since they don't lead to anything anyway. It's like VH, only with the handbrake on. If you consider that of the three girls who performed this show, two are too old to pass as a lesbian experiment, then the whole thing seems even stranger and completely absurd. Let's face it, Malina is a mother who is now in a completely different phase of her life and simply doesn't fit into RLC. I've always said that when a girl has to leave her BF at home that there is something extremely strange, but to leave a family behind to then perform such bullshit in RLC is just sick.
  2. Alladino
    The only problem is that this soft porn shit the girls put up yesterday is not their real life either. It's something the girls do at prime time to artificially boost viewership because otherwise they keep their lives too much out of that apartment. With Manila, I would even say that she is completely false there. She is a mother now, and for that reason alone she no longer fits into the project, as her life is usually no longer suitable for cameras. But if she then leaves her life behind to work in front of the cameras (e.g. to perform such silly shows) it is just sad and pitiful. She's just too old for that and her life has been in a different phase for a long time.
  3. Alladino
    They want to make it look like something might happen. But in the end there are only three hetero girls who are at work. All just show without emptionen or sexual attraction.
  4. Alladino
    This approach is simply sad. It is like VH only that practically nothing happens except teasing. Sorry, but as long as the real action only happens elsewhere, RLC has failed. These show events are not worth the money.
  5. Alladino
    With Milena there it was clear that it will come down to that kind of shit. Too old, too camera shy, and still want to pretend that there is something going on. Simply ridiculous.
  6. Alladino
    It seems that the girls have quickly understood that Manila is not really a fun person, and that she does more damage to the apartment as even an empty room could do. Nevertheless, I think that's kind of a lame excuse. The two alone, despite Malina in the project, could bring life to this apartment. Instead, next to nothing happens there. But to be honest, I don't believe in it anymore. The two play their show program, and otherwise the apartment will remain dead.
  7. Alladino
    No. I am a voyeur and quite right here. I have just decided to visit this forum more regularly again. Thank you for this idea. 🤣
  8. Alladino
    I don't like to go through the discussion again, but for me, the sex life is one of the indispensable elements for RLC. Anyone who hides this or keeps it out of the appartment somehow doesn't fit into the project. But I don't want to have this discussion again. Ultimately, however, Shantal is just one of many who somehow give me the impression that things are going badly. There are a lot of girls who, in my opinion, fall far short of their potential. Unfortunately, at the moment, especially the girls I find attractive and therefore fun to watch.
  9. Alladino
    In B1, only Magan is interesting for me to watch. Much like Ashley, Sambuka is just not good looking enough for me. Sure, it's personal taste, but that's the way it is. I think that Shantal is a complete miscast. By now I am very sure that nothing interesting will ever happen with her. Also, It is totally incomprehensible to me that she of all people has the large room.
  10. Alladino
    B2 is once again extremely boring. Apart from a few more strange events, which all seemed very artificial, nothing had happened there for ages. It's nothing new that Nadia uses the apartment mainly as a wardrobe. Not much really happens there.
  11. Alladino
    The current cast is surprisingly bad. There are a lot of good-looking girls, but very little happens with most of them. B5 is also a disaster at the moment. G&L don't fit in there at all.
  12. Alladino
    The relationship dynamic is certainly unusual, and I believe characterised by many misunderstandings. Nevertheless, it seems to work. The fact that thier sex is now less hidden shows a positive trend in relation to RLC. I would be surprised if they leave RLC now. In my opinion, even with very little happens, this is not the worst cast RLC has at the moment. I would like to see them get a bigger appartment where they can also occasionally keep out of each other's way. I think the flat there is more suitable for only one person, probably often used by people who work in a different city than the family lives in and only speend four nights a week there. A little more space would probably improve the relationship in general and therefore also the sex life.
  13. Alladino
    No. I think it needs someone to correct your twisted logic here. 🤣
  14. Alladino
    What makes you think that? Isn't it the opposite if she participates in a voyeur project but try her best to avoid the camera? She is kind of a freeloader. If she would be honest with herself, she should have to leave the project. That would be an act that deserves respect.
  15. Alladino
    Good for her, she can take these with her when she finally leaves the project. 🤣
  16. Alladino
    Where did I say that this is not or should not be the case? I said that ideally RLC should be as close as possible to a life as if there were no cameras. Of course, this also means that the residents leave the house (as is normal in life).
  17. Alladino
    Nobody said anything about specific. But, no one should ignore the RLC motto here either. This is clearly about giving a view into private life of the residents and not about hiding it from the camera. So if nothing happens even after months, then RLC is not living up to its own motto.
  18. Alladino
    What is wrong with you? If someone doesn't want to live in a apartment with cameras, they should move out. That is really easy to understand and not in the least reprehensible. Furthermore, the point is to live as normal (as if there were no cameras), including the normal sex life. Not doing that silly porn show shit. It's not something I came up with, it's more or less the concept of the project.
  19. Alladino
    Even though english is not my mother tongue, I understand very well what kind of nonsense you have written here, and in this case I specifically refer only to you. Again, Nobody wants to force the girls to do anything. The opposite is the case, I think RLC should be about the residents living as best they can as they would if there was no camera. You should also remember that participation in a project like RLC is an individual decision. If someone doesn't want those cameras, they shouldn't stay in an apartment with cameras. It's simple logic and no matter what nonsense you say it won't change.
  20. Alladino
    What is wrong with this forum. Who said anything about a "legal demand"? Nor has anyone here spoken of "brothel or girl-slave-trading"!! These are all things you have made up, and they make no sense for me whatsoever. Also, what I find totally ridiculous is the idea that a girl gets involved in a project like RLC, and then you seriously assume that it's perfectly understandable that she won't actually do anything because she "does not want to ruin her future by fucking or masturbating online in front of a cam just to satisfy some horny men on the other side of the screen". The simple, clear and obvious solution in this case is not to join in the project like RLC in the first place. How stupid one has to be not to recognise this simple truth. Completely absurd is your comment regarding "advocating to kick these girls out on the street". Do you really think the girls in the vacation apartment break down everything at there actual home for the few months they are there? This is ridiculos. Some of the girls even have quite obvious places to live nearby. Again, my only point is that the residents should participate in the project if they have chosen to be part of it. If they don't want to do that, then they should go. That is thier free decision. What annoys me are the do nothing girls who obviously just want to cash in without really contributing anything.
  21. Alladino
    I don't think we should confuse RLC with a normal porn site. At the same time, it is wrong to say that RLC is not a porn site. From my point of view RLC should be more than just porn. Also, The idea that non-participation in the project is necessary to be real life is wrong. From my point of view, the camera should have as little noticeable impact as possible. So, no girls who deliberately hold their genitals up to the cameras for hours (or are unrealistically naked all the time), but also no girls who hide their sex life from the camera. This results from the motto of showing the private lives of the residents, and is therefore somehow a must. For example, when Eva was still in the russian appartment, I had a lot of fun waiting for her to change her clothes, especially because she was usually dressed normally. There was a good camera for a very nice view. At the same time, there was the occasional sex, which, as you could see, was something the residents enjoyed. It is a balance, in combination with the right residents who are really involved in the project, that makes RLC quality. Shantal, is clearly holding back, which in my opinion is the opposite of what RLC needs.
  22. Alladino
    Let me tell you, if an attractive woman wants to have sex these days, she can have it. Nowadays, with tinder an other services, it's easier than ordering a pizza. 😂 But that is not the topic. My point is that it makes no sense to have a girl in the cast who obviously keeps her sex life away from the camera, or worse, is completely abstinent while in the project. RLC is a voyeur site, and the sex life of the residents is simply part of it. Simply leaving it out is not enough, it is just as bland as soup without salt. I also never said that I wanted to decide for the residents. This is again something you are trying to imply out of thin air. On the contrary. I think it is important that the residents live their real lives as good as posible, and the only agreement should be that we get an insight. But that also means that the residents really have to participate in the project. Otherwise it can't work. So no prison-like life, and also no self-censorship. It needs residents who actively enjoy life and are willing to live it out in front of the camera. As I said, I think for the vecation apartments, young good-looking party girls are the right choice. Shantal is simply too camera shy.
  23. Alladino
    Now just use your brain for once. For example, if I say to a soup that it is too bland, that does not mean that I would call salt water alone a soup. I'm well aware that a lot of ingredients go into a soup. But despite the fact that there are different types of soups, they all need the right amount of stock to be really good. I think this is a good analogy to sex on a voyeur site. There are many things that make the project realistic. Different hobbies of the girls, parties, cooking together, etc. but nevertheless it also needs the sex life of the residents to be really good. Just like the salt in the soup, you can't just leave it out. If it is missing, everything else loses quality.
  24. Alladino
    You should stop trying to twist my words. What more can I write than that I consider sex to be an essential element in RLC, but it is certainly not the only one? As I said, I think that do nothing girls should not be in the project. But that does not mean that I am only interested in sex in RLC. On the contrary, too much sex (or even excessive nudity) spoils the realistic impression just as much as no sex at all. BTW, when I say that I don't think Shantal should be in the project, it doesn't mean that RLC doesn't have other girls that fit well in the project. It should be normal for all girls in the project to have sex in the appartment occasionally.
  25. Alladino
    Nonsense. Let's go back to my example with the soup. When I talk about the fact that a soup can be salty or too bland, that doesn't mean that I would be satisfied with just salt water. Like I said, it kind of needs a bit of may components to be good. I think RLC should replace do nothing girls consistently. It needs girls who really participate in the project and don't censor their sex life on camera, or are to boring in general. BTW, Sex is part of a normal life. Considering that the girls are there for months and are in the prime time of their lives, it is just naive to think that they do not have sex at all.
×
×
  • Create New...