Alladino

Even though english is not my mother tongue, I understand very well what kind of nonsense you have written here, and in this case I specifically refer only to you. Again, Nobody wants to force the girls to do anything. The opposite is the case, I think RLC should be about the residents living as best they can as they would if there was no camera. You should also remember that participation in a project like RLC is an individual decision. If someone doesn't want those cameras, they shouldn't stay in an apartment with cameras. It's simple logic and no matter what nonsense you say it won't change.

What is wrong with this forum. Who said anything about a "legal demand"? Nor has anyone here spoken of "brothel or girl-slave-trading"!! These are all things you have made up, and they make no sense for me whatsoever. Also, what I find totally ridiculous is the idea that a girl gets involved in a project like RLC, and then you seriously assume that it's perfectly understandable that she won't actually do anything because she "does not want to ruin her future by fucking or masturbating online in front of a cam just to satisfy some horny men on the other side of the screen". The simple, clear and obvious solution in this case is not to join in the project like RLC in the first place. How stupid one has to be not to recognise this simple truth. Completely absurd is your comment regarding "advocating to kick these girls out on the street". Do you really think the girls in the vacation apartment break down everything at there actual home for the few months they are there? This is ridiculos. Some of the girls even have quite obvious places to live nearby. Again, my only point is that the residents should participate in the project if they have chosen to be part of it. If they don't want to do that, then they should go. That is thier free decision. What annoys me are the do nothing girls who obviously just want to cash in without really contributing anything.

I don't think we should confuse RLC with a normal porn site. At the same time, it is wrong to say that RLC is not a porn site. From my point of view RLC should be more than just porn. Also, The idea that non-participation in the project is necessary to be real life is wrong. From my point of view, the camera should have as little noticeable impact as possible. So, no girls who deliberately hold their genitals up to the cameras for hours (or are unrealistically naked all the time), but also no girls who hide their sex life from the camera. This results from the motto of showing the private lives of the residents, and is therefore somehow a must. For example, when Eva was still in the russian appartment, I had a lot of fun waiting for her to change her clothes, especially because she was usually dressed normally. There was a good camera for a very nice view. At the same time, there was the occasional sex, which, as you could see, was something the residents enjoyed. It is a balance, in combination with the right residents who are really involved in the project, that makes RLC quality. Shantal, is clearly holding back, which in my opinion is the opposite of what RLC needs.

Let me tell you, if an attractive woman wants to have sex these days, she can have it. Nowadays, with tinder an other services, it's easier than ordering a pizza. 😂 But that is not the topic. My point is that it makes no sense to have a girl in the cast who obviously keeps her sex life away from the camera, or worse, is completely abstinent while in the project. RLC is a voyeur site, and the sex life of the residents is simply part of it. Simply leaving it out is not enough, it is just as bland as soup without salt. I also never said that I wanted to decide for the residents. This is again something you are trying to imply out of thin air. On the contrary. I think it is important that the residents live their real lives as good as posible, and the only agreement should be that we get an insight. But that also means that the residents really have to participate in the project. Otherwise it can't work. So no prison-like life, and also no self-censorship. It needs residents who actively enjoy life and are willing to live it out in front of the camera. As I said, I think for the vecation apartments, young good-looking party girls are the right choice. Shantal is simply too camera shy.

Now just use your brain for once. For example, if I say to a soup that it is too bland, that does not mean that I would call salt water alone a soup. I'm well aware that a lot of ingredients go into a soup. But despite the fact that there are different types of soups, they all need the right amount of stock to be really good. I think this is a good analogy to sex on a voyeur site. There are many things that make the project realistic. Different hobbies of the girls, parties, cooking together, etc. but nevertheless it also needs the sex life of the residents to be really good. Just like the salt in the soup, you can't just leave it out. If it is missing, everything else loses quality.

You should stop trying to twist my words. What more can I write than that I consider sex to be an essential element in RLC, but it is certainly not the only one? As I said, I think that do nothing girls should not be in the project. But that does not mean that I am only interested in sex in RLC. On the contrary, too much sex (or even excessive nudity) spoils the realistic impression just as much as no sex at all. BTW, when I say that I don't think Shantal should be in the project, it doesn't mean that RLC doesn't have other girls that fit well in the project. It should be normal for all girls in the project to have sex in the appartment occasionally.

Nonsense. Let's go back to my example with the soup. When I talk about the fact that a soup can be salty or too bland, that doesn't mean that I would be satisfied with just salt water. Like I said, it kind of needs a bit of may components to be good. I think RLC should replace do nothing girls consistently. It needs girls who really participate in the project and don't censor their sex life on camera, or are to boring in general. BTW, Sex is part of a normal life. Considering that the girls are there for months and are in the prime time of their lives, it is just naive to think that they do not have sex at all.

Have you ever eaten a soup that was either over or under salted? You notice immediately that something is wrong, and no matter how good the rest of the ingredients are, the overall product is not right. For a voyeur site, realistic sex is something you can't just leave out. Even if everything else is right, one major element missing destroys the overall result. I think that's how best to describe Shantal in RLC. Also, in more general, for a concept like RLC to work, it needs the right people. They should at least be active, sympathetic, good-looking and involved in the project. None of this has to be perfect, but it is not enough to just get someone into the cast without to ask them a little bit about there personality and check for behaviour and looks. I have always said that especially for the vecation appartments, young party girls are probably best. It just doesn't make sense to have a nun in the cast. So if anyone has made the decision for their life not to have sex, they should probably not take part in a voyeur project. That should be clear to everyone.

Of course I am also talking about sex. It's ridiculous to pretend that on a voyeur site that usually has at least three cameras in every bedroom, it's not also about sex. That's exactly the point I want to make here. Why is a girl like Shantal in this project, who is clearly not ready to really live out her sex life in front of the camera, and therefore wastes the best room there? As I said, it's not about the fact that she hasn't had sex with this one guy, but that nothing ever happens.

No, it is the mix of different elements that makes RLC interesting. For example, it is just as useless to have a porn actor in the project who has sex but is a fake or is never present anyway. That's why I don't watch S&C apartament, for example. I just find it boring. RLC simply has too many girls where almost nothing ever, or actually never, something happens. An RLC where the girls keep their sex lives off camera, or cut back their lives to the point where virtually nothing happens, is useless. It's simply unrealistic that girls in the best time of their lives, with a virtually infinite amount of time, never have anything going on for months. What RLC needs are girls who are really involved in the project and not just doing their time as if they were in prison.

The problem is not that she hasn't had sex with this one specific guy, but that she is very camera shy in general. It just doesn't make much sense to keep a girl like that in the cast if nothing will ever happen, even after months in the project. Moreover, I really don't understand why RLC is awarding the best room in B1 to her of all the girls. The other two girls in B1 have regular visitors, and Magan in particular is much better integrated socially with the other girls, so it makes little sense for Shantal to keep a room like this.

Gabrielle & Louis do not fit well into the project from my point of view. Much too average and somehow unsympathetic. A clear step backwards compared to Wendsday & Wayne. Also, That the chemistry with T&T will be even worse, RLC could have anticipated. In general, RLC has somehow lost its quality, again. There are some girls who have a lot of sex but are not really attractive, and some girls who are attractive but have no (or almost no) sex in the appartments. All in all, this summer is more of a step backwards for RLC.

Yes, currently all of RLC is kind of on a downward trend again. In addition to all the girls who do nothing, or almost nothing, there are now two empty rooms in B4 and another empty room in B5. But what I find really annoying is the O&N apartment. It is ridiculous, what RLC wants to sell here as real life.

I also think it's a shame that they are no longer there. One of the best couples RLC has had. Very sympathetic couple. Maybe the two will come back to the project at some point. Maybe even in a couple apatment.

The problem is that they are not in this appartment to live there, but to work there. The real life (with actual emotions, actual friends, etc.) is missing. The appartment just appears way too fake and not at all lived in. It's like having an infinitely slow version of chaturbate there It is just annoying and pointless. They are just boring.

Yes, this new cast is really pathetic. It feels as if RLC is now openly bullshitting their customers. The whole thing is so fake and far from life that I have seen more honest cam shows on chaturbate. On top of that, the two of them are not even particularly good-looking. What a waste of this appartment.

I think Linda breaks off before she really an orgasm. She has been doing that for quite a while. She plays along a bit so Tibor can put on a show, but she doesn't want to. Now let's be honest, i know, in this forum the guy is always somehow the "bad" one, but that really borders on laughability. Linda metal finished with the project a really long time ago (way more than a year ago). It could also be that she has had a problem with depression. I don't know. But now to act as if Tibor is to blame for this, I think is just wrong. I think they should have left the project a long time ago. It's not just that Linda isn't really involved anymore, but also that they're getting too old. It's time for them to leave and start a new chapter in thier life. RLC need new younger people. Linda and Tibor time is long over.

No, I meant Shantal, sorry.

I really thought they were gone. Nice that they are just moved. 🙂

LOL, I've already written off the two and so only now realized that they are finally gone. What a total failure by RLC.

It is always the same show girl problem. Some girls want to be freeloaders with as little real involvement as possible. It is the same with Sambuka Shantal in B1. Ultimately, RLC should solve the problem by kicking out girls who don't participate. However, if RLC just tries to get the apartments full, regardless of whether this also creates actual content, this crap will just keep running forever. I don't really care if the girls spend a lot of time elsewhere. The problem is when practically nothing happens in the apartments, or the girls even get the idea of putting on some kind of silly show to make it look like something is happening. No one needs clowns in RLC.

What a load of crap. So RLC has found the next group of do-nothings who, instead of actually living in the apartment, put on some silly show.

Eh, I am a voyeur, and in the limits that a forum like this allows me, I openly admit it. Although this tendency is clearly not accepted by society. Homosexuality, on the other hand, is clearly socially accepted, at least in my area. Why would I have a problem admitting it here if I were gay? Your statement makes zero sense. The trouble I strongly suspect you have, however, would be a clear explanation of why you are still pretending that you are not gay. I really think that you are masking your homosexuality with homophobia. Do you come from a strict religious or very conservative background? Those are two really strong influencing factors for people like I suspect you are. Anyway, it's important for me to make it clear to you that you can openly admit here that it's you who can't take his eyes off the guys. In truth, that's why you thought of this topic in the first place, isn't it?

LOL, My idea is that the girls have fun in the apartment and not only somewhere else. Your problem is and will always be that you ignore that most girls are straight (i.e. they like guys). I like to see girls having fun. In your version, they sleep most of the time and hang out on their smartphones the rest of the time at this place. All the action is happening somewere else. Your idea is not working. It is boring as hell. BTW, Did you try to find a therapist to help you overcome your homophobia? I would be really interested to know if I am right with my strong assumption. Are you actually try to compensate your homosexuality with homophobia?

Well, you wanted an apartment with only girls, now you have an apartment with only girls. I have tried to explain to you more than once that the action would then also takes place somewhere else, but you thought you knew better. 🤣