Jump to content

SierraTM

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,164

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Points

    14,930 [ Donate ]

 Content Type 

Everything posted by SierraTM

  1. SierraTM
    I am not sure about you guys but I like this girl. I think it is not unreasonable to think that RLC might offer her a role in this apartment if Hakeem asks for her. But right now, our Hakeem pal here is having the week of his life so probably a long-term replacement for Asia is probably off the table for now. The short-haired girl who arrived before the chubby girl is nice too but I think she might be just an one-off or will just be visiting.
  2. SierraTM
    3 hours UM??? What are they trying to fix? Cindy? Just an air ticket will do, IMO.
  3. SierraTM
    I agree with you the showgirls are not exactly putting in realistic, lively performances but just putting up solo sex scenes like those you can see on the web but these are content that the provider has to show to the viewers because if not, there isn't much to watch. If you remove showgirls, you will not only have to send home Monica, Ginger & Irma, you have to remove Leora & Nelly as well to be consistent. Other than Sofie, Leora is the biggest showgirl on RLC. Nelly is a showgirl too IMO. Like you mentioned previously, 'real life' can only be achieved in couples or girls apartments and not in GOV because the tenants in apartments actually are living there long-term compared to GOV girls who may stay for 2 days to 6 months. But if you look at it from RLC's perspective, removing the GOV component will cause their subscriptions to drop quite drastically and they will need to readjust their rates because there won't be that many more subscribers. Lets face it, there are more who are watching the GOV compared to the other 6 apartments. And some of the apartments are rather dead. The GOV project also allows the viewers to see new participants every 2-3 months, which is both refreshing and a relief if they find the current girls to be not of their liking. Just take a look at VHTV, where they have all apartments and look at their viewership and compare to RLC. If RLC switch back to full apartments, they will face a subscribers' exodus. Then, they will have issue with budgeting and may have to cut down on the content you see. Just remember, by theory, the more RLC earns, the more they can afford to pay for content.
  4. SierraTM
    I think the GOV project needs to have a mixture of such girls, show girls and girls who will bate or have sexual fun occasionally. Not DO-NOTHING girls of course. These girls should not be in a porn project.
  5. SierraTM
    The new girl seems like someone who might be willing to have fun & not talk on her phone all day or do a Cindy.
  6. SierraTM
    I wonder what is written in the contracts for these new girls. And I wonder what is RLC going to do with Joy, allow her to continue as she wishes for a month or negotiate for some content to come out of her? B4 is probably at its worst (again!!!).
  7. SierraTM
    I think the main issue is that the sexual content, with the exception of Elettra, are still only being carried out by the recycled girls. Girls like Joy and the now removed Cindy do nothing of these. Not only they lack sexual content, all they do all day are 1) glued to their phones, 2) sit around in the kitchen, 3) smoke in the terrace, 4) sit around in the living room & of cos the classic, 5) lie on their beds all day. Working girls need to be managed, that's why during the post-war times in the US, the rise of pimps and their girls dominate the streets. You allow the new girls to do whatever they like, you'll definitely get what I mentioned above cos who the fuck wants to willingly bate for thousands of perverts without being 'forced/asked' to do it?????
  8. SierraTM
    Oh RLC meant is her having joy on the phone... 😏
  9. SierraTM
  10. SierraTM
    Allow me to add on, she bated undercover on the 5th, 6th & 7th of Oct. I remember clearly because I did ask RLC if they think it was alright for Alla to keep on doing what she did. To RLC's credit, Alla had a turnaround & of cos the rest was history.
  11. SierraTM
    No no I think we both want the girls to do more and provide realistic content and also sexual content but I don't really quite agree the GOV concept is an absolute failure. I think the GOV concept is an alternative to the couples apartment or Leora's apartment but after these few months, I can see your frustrations. I agree the apartments need more guys, I always believe having guys will help the girls open up but the girls have to be willing to interact with the guys in the first place.
  12. SierraTM
    No what I mean is that, in some countries, they signed contracts and one of the terms was that they could not have sex on TV, be it covered or uncovered. In some countries, the male contestants can't even expose their genitals. So the intention of both Big Brother or Love Island, is vastly differently from RLC. And on both Big Brother & Love Island, the personal information of each contestant is either exposed to the public or followed up closely by tabloids. This is what really defines Reality TV. On RLC, for example, they don't expose Monica's personal details to their subscribers. I believe Monica will ban anyone from following her social media account if she knows they are RLC subscribers. On Big Brother/Love Island, your personal details/employment history/family background will be made public once you join the competition. This is not the case for RLC's tenants. I understand you are trying to draw similarities but the fact is, they are very different. One test you can try doing to prove your point. On your own verified Facebook account (if you have), put up the link of RLC member page (provide your access details) and ask all your family and friends if they think you are watching porn or reality TV.
  13. SierraTM
    This is true but can you really blame the girls? They are here on a job and are paid to do their jobs. I am happy for each of the them to suck RLC dry as long as they provide the entertainment. But again, you know I am not against the GOV concept, I am just against girls who do not provide sexual content.
  14. SierraTM
    No either you are getting me wrong or you are redacting my comment and using what is useful to you. Since in some countries, their contestants are not allowed to have sex on TV nor masturbate on TV, they are not the censored version of RLC because the show is not intended to show sexual content! These shows are competitions and allow public voting. They are what they are, and RLC is a pornography website. And in some seasons of Big Brother UK, there isn't any nudity or censored nudity and viewership remain relatively high because of the celebrity/model contestants. We are not comparing apple with apple.
  15. SierraTM
    No, in some countries, their contestants are not allowed to have sex on TV. And RLC's tenants are not contestants. They don't compete on anything and don't have to 'survive' as such. They can rot on the bed all day and get paid. Which might be what you want the tenants to do. Edit: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/love-island/index.html This is real reality TV, where what happens on set will lead on to real life and heavily reported on tabloids. Please do not compare what is on RLC to reality TV shows like Big Brother or Love Island. People can die after competing in the competition, people's lives can be messed up after joining the competition. In RLC, we don't see that. In fact, the girls come back one after another and make their euros happily. They hide their personal info and RLC help them to hide it unless you manage to chance on their social media accounts.
  16. SierraTM
    Please read my whole comment and not just take what you want to make fun of. Please do not be like Trump. The videos are found on sites because they don't clamp down on them like RLC does. Even Russian forums have limited amount of RLC videos.
  17. SierraTM
    This can't be because if you consider Big Brother to be reality TV, than RLC is reality pornography. This is the logical association if we follow your logic.
  18. SierraTM
    I think it is pointless to argue on with you, just like previously, you are always insistent that you are always correct. If I as a fucking whiner can tell you Alla, whom I whined about, was better than Cindy, I believe I have no logical sense to contradict myself that bad right now. Alla was weird, that is the furthest you can criticise her in her first month. She delivered her 'sexual content' while hiding from the cameras. Cindy delivers nothing of such. All Cindy delivers is that she is consistently making good use of the space in the kitchen and in the living room.
  19. SierraTM
    Big Brother is not pornography. It is a reality competition on mainstream TV which voters can decide who to keep or kick on every few rounds. This content is unique because in some countries, it is heavily inducted with sexual content to keep some audience interested while in other countries like the UK and or US, the sexual content is censored or the cameras will move away if they think an accidental nudity was incoming. Big Brother is just another version of reality TV, with celebrity participants or model participants, which the general audience can accept and watch on mainstream TV to a certain extent. The main pull of Big Brother is actually how the contestants live with each other on set, make alliance and try to outplay each other so that they can avoid being voted off. Sometimes for the female participants, being willingly sexual on set will help their cause. Comparing RLC to Big Brother is kinda rough for me. In fact, it is quite unfair to label them as pornography I think.
  20. SierraTM
    I think most of us don't jerk off to RLC's porn, well at least for me I can't type and jerk off at the same time. All of us enjoying watching the interaction between the girls living together, no one will say the interaction are not unnecessary and not important but since this is ultimately a porn site (if you are still in doubt, send the URL link of this site to a credible lawyer. I sent to mine, and she told me half-jokingly not to tempt her to watch porn while at work...), the girls must be willing and show clear indication that she is able to provide sexual content. And hopefully, we don't have to wait 2-3 months to see that. Wasting USD$45 per month for 3 months to wait out a girl is unfortunately not something I would do. What I want to be clear is that we should be rational and not emotional when it comes to paying money for pornography. And stop telling yourself you don't watch porn because RLC is porn.
  21. SierraTM
    Alla, so far is the most recent girl in my memory who did a turnaround and provide solo, G/G and B/G entertainment in B4. But Cindy, from her time here until she ultimately leaves, has not given us any indication that she would be an Alla. Alla did provide bates, both undercover and half-covered even before she had a 180 degrees turnaround. Cindy provided nothing. Please do not compare Cindy to Alla. Voyeurism, in this aspect, since the cameras are not hidden, is pornography and not real voyeurism as you always assume it to be. It is not, please do not take RLC's words for it. There isn't any real life to talk about. Girls like Monica are happy to do shows but will not fuck her b/f or male friend on camera which I will respect because this is her choice. The girls, especially those in GOV, are unlikely to bring any real life content to the apartments unless there is a pre-arrangement with RLC (which defeats the purpose anyway). For the Russian apartments, I will admit you and perhaps some others are more informed about this. I assume this plays a part too, so I cannot disagree with you on this. Edit: "Some people have better information than speculation about how RLC or Barcelona apartments work and what girls say in apartments" - Yes I know you are one of the some people, but I am not really interested in what the girls say in Russian or listen in to their conversations. I know you are willingly a double agent because you want information about RLC and the girls, which is absolutely fine. Some people just want to know more while some could care less.
  22. SierraTM
    The issue here is content. I am not sure if you have created or run a website before but for RLC, content is what drives high sales. RLC is not targeting to make reasonable revenue, they are targeting the mass market of porn subscribers and are using their 'own model of pornography' to compete with other major players. Please note their competitors are definitely not VHTV or other voyeur cam sites, trust me I signed up VHTV and realised it isn't so. That is why RLC don't really worry about these competitors. The new girls are either not indicating that they will, or basically not willing to provide sexual content to attract and keep hold of the subscribers who want to see them. Not everyone has the patience to wait 2-3 months to watch a girl naked or watch her bate with makeup on. It seems like RLC's 'new business model' is stricter and less oblivious. They want the girls to know what is expected of them and they are on a clock. They also understand that not all subscribers are willing to pay USD$45 per month for non-guaranteed sexual content, to watch 'a Cindy' do her exciting routines all day via a few minutes of fast-forwarding on Replay. Of course, we are assuming (or at least you are) that RLC kicked Cindy. Maybe Cindy wants to leave because she does not feel comfortable being real on cameras.
  23. SierraTM
    I wish people don't keep twisting my words and assume that I whine, moan, bitch and cry about new girls all the time. I complain about girls who provide absolutely no entertainment value to subscribers on this project with sexual content. Like I said, your lovely girl Cindy, does absolutely nothing that indicate that she fits into this project. And I assume you prescribe to this project to see sexual content and not Disney. Please do not play the moral high ground (for the lack of a better phrase) and declare that I don't like or want someone different who does not lie naked on her bed all day, pointing her pussy at the camera and regularly masturbating. The fact you signed for this project means you are a perv and you want to see sexual content, be it how regular it is shown to you. And I wonder why some people think that this is a true voyeur project when clearly, when the cameras are open and exposed to the tenants, this project is not what RLC say it is. There cannot be 'true real life' in this project when the tenants behave differently whenever they are on cameras, with makeups and even wearing makeups to sleep. Do all girls wear their makeups to sleep? Do all girls stare at their phones all day at home? You mentioned Chaturbate, which I assume it to be similar to MFC where the girls have their own cameras and do their own things. This is not comparable to RLC. We cannot tell the tenants what we want them to do, we cannot throw money at them to get them to do something or to do something that we like directly. If you think by kicking one Cindy, RLC will transform into Chaturbate, you are unfortunately misinformed. On Chaturbate, the girls have to come up with content to attract $$$ or tokens like you mentioned. On RLC, the girls don't need to do that. They really could afford lying around all day and wait for day to come and night to fall. If RLC operates like Chaturbate, then you can be sure there will be no complaints from me because the girls have to come up with content to make $$$. On RLC, if you don't say a word, RLC will just keep showing you what the girls really want to do. That is to do nothing since they are paid anyway (assuming they don't care about the bonuses). Comparing MFC/Chaturbate to RLC makes no sense, unless RLC comes up with a pay-per-view structure for each girl in her room. RLC is meant for people who wants sexual content other than the other mainstream pornography you can find online. RLC, as you can see, is targeting people who wants to watch stimulated voyeurism, and not 'spying on girls' daily lives' cos there isn't really any spying. I mentioned this before. This is not a hidden camera website, where sexual content is not a given but a bonus and a lower monthly rate. RLC is in fact like a company-run Chaturbate, with multiple cameras on each girl and in each apartment. It has to operate like so to attract mass audience to fund its operation, which is definitely at a higher cost on average compared to other mainstream porn sites. Having cameras to watch Cindy do as you like, 'someone that didn't lie naked on her bed all day pointing her pussy at the camera and regularly masturbating', cannot drive the kind of sales they want to maintain the apartments and their girls. This is perhaps why RLC rather bring back the recycled girls to create content than take risks on new girls. This i believe most of us should understand but hate. What now for me? Simple, watch the new girls and complain as per I do before your precious Cindy is taken off the list. I don't complain about girls who have content for the audience. I don't complain about girls who bring back guys and attempt to create interaction and sex. I don't complain about girls who organize parties and participate in them. Example like the Twins & Gina, who are not all loved by the audience, they were lively in parties and interacted with the opposite sex. Have you read any complaints from me about Gina? On the other hand, girls like Kelly, who obviously isn't bisexual, don't do shows & not interested in parties but I really like her? No one who isn't dumb on this forum, will irrationally complain about anything without reason. Don't assume I am one. I know maybe you are angry because you think maybe after 2-3 months, Cindy might open up and do more for the cameras and then you can 'fully enjoy watching' her doing sexual content. But please remember, that's mean we have to wait 2-3 months, waste one bed and one room, for a girl who may or may not turn around and create her own sexual content. Unless, you are NOT EXPECTING ANY SEXUAL CONTENT from her, then obviously you are the one subscribing to the wrong website, or else there is no logical reason to wait her out and watch her lie on the bed fully clothed, visit the kitchen and work on her laptop in the living room. If you want to watch that, find a real girlfriend or a wife. If you are attached, spend more time at home with him or her. Please also that while RLC will really appreciate such patience from subscribers, not many will tolerate DO-NOTHINGNESS from girls for 2-3 months and RLC also cannot afford to show 'non-sexual content' to boost subscriptions. People sign up for RLC to watch sexual content, of course many leave because such content are now provided mainly by recycled girls. This is the main reason for the steady drop in viewership. Not because we are turning away girls like your precious Cindy. I notice you write clearly and express your frustrations (and emotions) quite logically so I am more than happy to reply you. Thanks for sharing about Chaturbate too.
  24. SierraTM
    Am I wrong or are the new girls without much tats? Girls with tats give me the 'Cindy anxiety' 😏
  25. SierraTM
    I think the taller girl is Juliet.
×
×
  • Create New...