Jump to content
*** New Software Coming Soon! Please Check for Important Information in the Read Me Section ***

SierraTM

Members
  • Posts

    3,164
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Points

    14,930 [ Donate ]

Everything posted by SierraTM

  1. Yes you can reduce the number of royals doing their duties but not Harry and Williams, who are the most popular and well-known royals around. Dudes like Prince Andrews, the Queen would be happy if he stops touching kids.
  2. Yea I do believe the royal family will continue to bankroll their lifestyle in Canada or at least his father would with his own funding that does not come from the public. Archie is still a royal descendant, might be different if Harry & his wife are childless.
  3. Exactly, the press will always be following them and reporting on every move or decision they make so I don't see the point of them dropping their royal duties and just piss off to Canada. And it seems legally, there is a constitutional understanding between Canada, Britain and the Crown that the royals can't spend too much time in Canada so perhaps that was why they chose to dump their royal status. But yes, I have the feeling that the Canadian government might end up either paying for their security detail or at least subsidising it.
  4. Not really, the UK royals are rich enough to be independent of taxpayers' money so I don't think those who are pissed with Harry's decision will be thinking about the money saved. It is more of being faithful to your royal duties and be part of the national efforts. But it seems not everyone is concerned about the young royals' departure so I guess not many people are giving them a shit lol.
  5. I just thought the UK people might have good impression of Diana's sons so Harry abandoning his royal duty might kind of irked them. Guess I might be wrong.
  6. I think it is not about succession but more about the duty of the royals. They are born into a special family with special privileges and they use public funds so they should not be given the 'freedom' or opportunity to quit on the 'royal family' after spending the resources and funding. Especially for Williams and Harry, who are the undisputed most popular pair of royals in the world. This I feel is poorly handled by Harry & his wife, there is no real need to quit & 'live their own lives'. It is just rather selfish of them to a certain extent although there are examples of royal descendants choosing to live a 'commoner's life'.
  7. I felt the Twins were alright when they were with Gina and/or Stella. On their latest stay, they stayed here without their friends although Gina visited occasionally. When they were transferred to B4, they had some harmless fun with the boys which I felt was quite good and real. Comparing them to Monica and Milena, IMO they were better.
  8. Going off-topic, what are your thoughts about the young royal couple going to Canada or basically Megxit? 🙄
  9. Not sure but at least for me the Twins provided content. Kristy right now is boring as fuck. If you are referring to girls from the Moscow apartment, I prefer Kaley. I feel she is the most sexy girl among them.
  10. This question applies to many of the recycled girls. There was one who stayed in Irma's room, and then a few more at B4. On every 10 decisions that RLC makes, 9 of them are stupid decisions.
  11. Despite what you have seen so far which may seem fun, IMO it think it is less genuine between Kristy and Irma compared to Kristy and Alana. But because Kristy and Alana provide zero content & entertainment, I don't watch at them at all. They are wasting their time on this project earning little bonuses, when they should quit earlier and find a real proper job that they can do for years.
  12. I can agree with you. She is here to work on a project, there is no true voyeurism. Most of the girls here are either putting on a show or are behaving differently in the house knowing that there are cameras. The girls even put on makeup before they bate and/or after breakfast, so they do understand they are on a "Big Brother project" and not being spied by a true, real-life hidden voyeurism site. Unfortunately, just like when you are at work in office or at your workplace, you may or may not bring in or share about your personal life. You may not bring fun into the office and you may not fall in love in the same office or bring friends to meet your colleagues. It is the same with most if not all of the girls here on this project. You have to remember, this is ultimately a porn project, it is a 24/7 live-cams project and not what RLC wants us to think it might be. The term 'Real Life" in RLC is extremely misleading.
  13. No one will forget Damira 😉 She is THE MADAME.
  14. RLC Replay REPLAY.REALLIFECAM.COM Watch your favorite cams in 24-hour recording Monica should use more of her fingers like what she was doing about an hour ago & perhaps use some lube or coconut oil. I find her bates are sexier when she uses her fingers.
  15. Sara and Holly were rather good, willing to participate and have fun. Some of the girls were willing too but just that the guys whom they brought in weren't too excited about being porn stars 😏
  16. eh where did u see this part?
  17. All that you just said can only apply if RLC is a true voyeur cams site but they are not. RLC is a cams site, there aren't any voyeurism because the tenants know about the cameras and there are rules to follow. Any so-called voyeurism is what RLC wants you to believe they have for you, but in reality everything is created content. Let me repeat again, there can be no true voyeurism content when the cameras are known to the tenants. There are other true hidden cams sites operated by Chinese groups which I know of, these are completely different from what RLC wants to believe they are showing. What you are trying to say is an old discussion topic repeated over and over again. Some of the older lads here previously talked about shows + fake voyeurism content, which is probably the closest to what RLC is trying to show us. I think this is what we are seeing. So there must be content because the girls are there to provide it. If there isn't any structured content, there will be no need for RLC to bring back the recycled girls. If you want to go babble off about what you know, please kindly be sure of what you know.
  18. Yea we can stop comparing Ginger to these two clowns who should be sent home.
  19. According to RLC, doing nothing at home except looking at their phones all day and taking baths wearing bikinis IS FUCKING REAL LIFE. So fucking real we are paying our hard-earned money to watch them.
  20. Two DO-NOTHING girls in this apartment & one of them occupies the main bedroom. You remove these 2 girls and keep Irma, it is the same content but at a lower cost. RLC, time to think with your heads and with not your dickheads.
  21. Yes this blondie Kim is looking to be another DO-NOTHING girl, like the bunch we have now in B4 and two more at B1. Why then RLC bring her back? Probably they run out of options...
  22. As long as she is not a DO-NOTHING girl and she contributes like Alla (without the sex) I am happy. The boyfriend and sex are bonuses. I just want the girls to stop behaving like lifeless corpses on-cams. They are here to work, they are paid and they should contribute to this project and provide entertainment. If not RLC should not be retaining them. The problem is RLC's screening is so bad they always have to bring back recycled girls to provide the content. The manager, whoever she or he might be, ought to be sacked long ago.
  23. yes i can see this coming, and I am fine with girls coming in with boyfriends but they must be open and be willing to please the audience. if not why bother coming here...
×
×
  • Create New...