livingroomcam 1 now called 2 and locket for paying visiters !

[shibalobbens]

lol ;D ;D but a agree mor sex in livingroom is not good for paying members  :D ???

[Brureb28]

Well...guess I was wrong on both guesses

[dzonikonj]

Greedy bastards, all about fuckin dollars..! Lockin livingroomcam because we want your money !!!

No more RLC, wasting time and life anyways....

[Houlii]

hope you all are not having a hard time finding free porn on the internet.

[sajaan]

Free porn? on the internet you say?

It's so crazy, it just might work!

[dmizzle26]

thinking bout what i said last night that half of it is our blame for making RLC a porn site when it was never advertised as being one....i also gotta say that maybe the main reason for locking the living room cam is because Isabel & Marcelo was basically having 95% of their sex in the living room they prob gave them a warning before all that which to me would be bullshit because it kinda ruins the voyeur aspect that you is promoting on the site because you is basically dictating what a couple can and cannot do on cam and they isnt really living a true life

[Guest AlleyKat]

GOOD BYE RLC it's time 4 us to move on!

[lazer069]

I wonder what RLC would do if Isabel and Marcelo rearranged their living room and scooted the couch over by the table area. Im sure they would probably replace them. It was nice while it lasted so just wanted to say thanks Isabel and Marcelo

[Guest ferrymaat]

Just a reminder, it's not a free sex site. It's called Real Life Cams because that's what it's about. If you are only interested in free sex, just type that in google, and you'll be pumping your shotgun in a matter of minutes.

But if a couple is living on a couch most of the time and you block that cam for free watching, you also missing 90 procent of there normal life and if reallifecam was not about seks Why do the charge money for the cams where the seks is ? thats the way the make money, letting people pay for watching there live seks .

[albino]

Is it worth paying money for this crappy site,there are many free resources with a similar theme, why pay for cheating?

[Badboy23]

IF I was RLC (which obviously I'm not) I would not be overly happy at the amount of sex going on in free areas. I used to subscribe then realised between 'freebies' and this forum (and a couple of other related sites) that I really no longer needed to.

IF I was them I'd maybe get the couples to hold back on open sex in free areas - but I would make sure that in the paying areas the cameras were of such quality and close-up that it encouraged people back there. Just my thoughts but I recall some of the bed views (loras, Alinas, even Mayas wasn't great) were not exactly 'quality' and to be honest the ones I'd pay for at the mo tend to have sex quite openly anyway. Just my thoughts...

[TBG 150]

Excellent thoughts too. You would think that RLC would put in a few more cams to the pay areas and make them of much better quality. As it is, they are as grainy and out of focus as the ones in the free areas.

I wonder if there is a site out there that would give something like investor stats on the company. P&L statements and what the gross revenue and expenses are of running the site. If they're giving away anything such as rent, it has to be a fairly big expense sheet along with server fees. I also wonder what they have as a gross membership as far as revenue goes.

You figure with a world population of 7.1 billion, even if they were to score just 1 million subscribers, which would be less than half of 1%, thats $30 million /month.  $20k/month in expenses and I would say they're doing pretty damned good. But I'm just pulling numbers out of the air here. I have no idea of what they really are.