SPYING 1 Posted May 10, 2022 Share Posted May 10, 2022 So we have reached 30 pages & since I posted the most post on thread #6, I'll start a new thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPYING 1 Posted May 10, 2022 Author Share Posted May 10, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPYING 1 Posted May 10, 2022 Author Share Posted May 10, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPYING 1 Posted May 10, 2022 Author Share Posted May 10, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPYING 1 Posted May 10, 2022 Author Share Posted May 10, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPYING 1 Posted May 10, 2022 Author Share Posted May 10, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarLight28 Posted May 10, 2022 Share Posted May 10, 2022 Nun hat es das kleine Arschloch von Spying 1 wieder geschafft Themen-Führer dieses Threats zu sein -@fröhliches war zu langsam um diesen chronischen Wichtigtuer abzuwehren. 😁 Nun ist es auch nicht mehr möglich auf "alte" Beiträge zu antworten. Das ist total schlecht. Ich hatte geschrieben, dass das „ selbständige “ Leben eines Menschen erst nach der Durchtrennung der Nabelschnur beginnt.@Ridgerunner"fragte" darauf, ob geborene Kinder, deren Nabelschnur noch nicht durchtrennt ist, "abgetrieben" werden dürfen ?? Diese Aussage oder Frage ist reine Dummheit. Natürlich existieren in der Schwangerschaft 2 Leben in 1 Körper. Stirbt die Mutter, durch Unfall oder akute schwere Krankheit, dann stirbt zu 99% auch das 2. Leben in ihr. Der Fötus ist allein nicht lebensfähig. Einen älteren Fötus bei sterbender Mutter zu retten ist nur in 1% der Fälle durch Kaiserschnitt möglich. Im Thema "Abtreibung" geht es nicht um Mord von Kindern - wie Ridge suggeriert - sondern um schwerwiegende Einzelfälle zum Schutz der Mutter. Es ist für eine Frau unzumutbar, eine Art nach Vergewaltigung oder erbgeschädigt auszutragen. Damit wäre eine Frau "Gebär-Maschine" ohne Recht auf Selbstbestimmung über ihren eigenen Körper. Eine Frau allein soll das nicht entscheiden. In Deutschland ist eine "Schwangerschafts-Unterbrechung" = "Abtreibung" per Gesetz nur in den ersten 3 Monaten nach psychologischer Beratung durch Fachärzte möglich - und moralisch vertretbar. Ein generelles Verbot von "Abtreibung" ist menschenunwürdig und kriminell. Ein wichtiger Grund, warum aufgeklärte Frauen von heute das konservative Arschloch von Trump als Typ von vorgestern nicht gewählt haben und Trump die letzte Wahl deutlich verloren hat. Dumme Wichser mit Ideen von gestern braucht kein Mensch. Biden ist ein alter Mann, gut, doch denkt er moderner als konservative Rep-Wichser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarLight28 Posted May 10, 2022 Share Posted May 10, 2022 8 hours ago, SPYING 1 said: So we have reached 30 pages & since I posted the most post on thread #6, I'll start a new thread DU bist ein elendes Wichtigtuer-Arschloch. Viele Beiträge, viel Scheisse. Keiner braucht Dich - Baby. Du bist ein dummes und widerliches Ekel-Paket. 😁 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPYING 1 Posted May 10, 2022 Author Share Posted May 10, 2022 38 minutes ago, StarLight28 said: Now the little asshole from Spying 1 has managed to be the topic leader of this threat again -@Merry was too slow to fend off this chronic busybody. 😁 Now it is no longer possible to reply to "old" posts. This is totally bad. I wrote that a person's “ independent ” life only begins after the umbilical cord has been cut.@Ridgerunner"asked" whether born children whose umbilical cord has not yet been severed may be "aborted" ?? This statement or question is pure stupidity. Of course, there are 2 lives in 1 body during pregnancy. If the mother dies as a result of an accident or an acute serious illness, 99% of the time her second life dies as well. The fetus is not viable on its own. Saving an older fetus in a dying mother is possible only in 1% of cases by caesarean section. The subject of "abortion" is not about the murder of children - as Ridge suggests - but about serious individual cases to protect the mother. It is unacceptable for a woman to carry a species to term after rape or hereditary defects. This would mean that a woman would be a "giving machine" with no right to self-determination over her own body. A woman alone should not decide that. In Germany, a "pregnancy interruption" = "abortion" is only possible by law in the first 3 months after psychological advice from specialists - and morally justifiable. A general ban on "abortion" is inhumane and criminal. An important reason why today's enlightened women didn't vote for Trump's conservative asshole as the guy from the day before yesterday and why Trump clearly lost the last election. No one needs stupid wankers with ideas from yesterday. Biden's an old man, fine, but he thinks more modern than conservative rep wankers. So your reasoning is since the baby needs it's mother she has total decisions on the babies life, using your opinion than since welfare recipients needs the American taxpayers under your assumption than we can eliminate the welfare recipients Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPYING 1 Posted May 10, 2022 Author Share Posted May 10, 2022 3 minutes ago, StarLight28 said: YOU are a miserable busybodies asshole. Lots of posts, lots of shit. Nobody needs you - baby. You are a stupid and disgusting disgust package. 😁 It was your family that killed millions of people in WW2, so who's the the disgusting disgrace to the human race Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPYING 1 Posted May 10, 2022 Author Share Posted May 10, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPYING 1 Posted May 10, 2022 Author Share Posted May 10, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts