Jump to content

It Has Begun: Russia Invades Ukraine #6 Begins 03/20/22


Recommended Posts

On 3/26/2023 at 12:51 PM, StarLight28 said:

 

WWW.MERKUR.DE

Der Kreml scheint sein ganzes Panzerarsenal ausschöpfen zu müssen, um in der Ukraine seine Offensive zu fahren. Das beinhaltet wohl auch Sowjetpanzer.

 

My money is on the German-made Leopards. The Armata looks good, but there are few of them, and upgrading older Soviet models won't withstand Challengers or Leopards. In fact, they wouldn't even see or hear the Abrams tank that destroyed them. If deployed properly with fully trained personnel, NATO equipment looks substantially more useful than old re-habbed Federation  or Soviet equipment.

Xi's watching intently. Russia has all the natural resources Xi needs, and the Russian women are quite beautiful. They would make beautiful decorations for the New Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere.

As for NATO, the Western Democracies are China's biggest customer, so Xi's playing his cards carefully.

We'll see what happens with this war unless we get nuked before it ends...

-----

Mein Geld ist auf den in Deutschland hergestellten Leoparden. Der Armata sieht gut aus, aber es gibt nur wenige davon, und die Aufrüstung älterer sowjetischer Modelle wird Challengers oder Leopards nicht standhalten. Tatsächlich würden sie den Abrams-Panzer, der sie zerstörte, nicht einmal sehen oder hören. Wenn sie richtig mit voll ausgebildetem Personal eingesetzt wird, sieht NATO-Ausrüstung wesentlich nützlicher aus als alte rehabilitierte Ausrüstung der Föderation oder der Sowjetunion.

Xi sieht aufmerksam zu. Russland hat alle natürlichen Ressourcen, die Xi braucht, und die russischen Frauen sind ziemlich schön. Sie würden schöne Dekorationen für die New Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere machen.

Was die NATO betrifft, so sind die westlichen Demokratien Chinas größter Kunde, also spielt Xi seine Karten vorsichtig aus.

Wir werden sehen, was mit diesem Krieg passiert, es sei denn, wir werden zerbombt, bevor er endet ...

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Foamy T. Squirrel said:

My money is on the German-made Leopards. The Armata looks good, but there are few of them, and upgrading older Soviet models won't withstand Challengers or Leopards. In fact, they wouldn't even see or hear the Abrams tank that destroyed them. If deployed properly with fully trained personnel, NATO equipment looks substantially more useful than old re-habbed Federation  or Soviet equipment.

Xi's watching intently. Russia has all the natural resources Xi needs, and the Russian women are quite beautiful. They would make beautiful decorations for the New Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere.

As for NATO, the Western Democracies are China's biggest customer, so Xi's playing his cards carefully.

We'll see what happens with this war unless we get nuked before it ends...

-----

Mein Geld ist auf den in Deutschland hergestellten Leoparden. Der Armata sieht gut aus, aber es gibt nur wenige davon, und die Aufrüstung älterer sowjetischer Modelle wird Challengers oder Leopards nicht standhalten. Tatsächlich würden sie den Abrams-Panzer, der sie zerstörte, nicht einmal sehen oder hören. Wenn sie richtig mit voll ausgebildetem Personal eingesetzt wird, sieht NATO-Ausrüstung wesentlich nützlicher aus als alte rehabilitierte Ausrüstung der Föderation oder der Sowjetunion.

Xi sieht aufmerksam zu. Russland hat alle natürlichen Ressourcen, die Xi braucht, und die russischen Frauen sind ziemlich schön. Sie würden schöne Dekorationen für die New Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere machen.

Was die NATO betrifft, so sind die westlichen Demokratien Chinas größter Kunde, also spielt Xi seine Karten vorsichtig aus.

Wir werden sehen, was mit diesem Krieg passiert, es sei denn, wir werden zerbombt, bevor er endet ...

The T14 is a piece of junk.  There are less than twenty with only eight having actually visually accounted for.  Junk engines, only three crew. The Ruzzians have only deployed 1 into Ukraine so far.  Far from the front in order to give Solovyov,  and those two bitches Skabeyeva and Simonyan something to cheer about.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, maxfactor said:

The T14 is a piece of junk.  There are less than twenty with only eight having actually visually accounted for.  Junk engines, only three crew. The Ruzzians have only deployed 1 into Ukraine so far.  Far from the front in order to give Solovyov,  and those two bitches Skabeyeva and Simonyan something to cheer about.  

The T14 is great on paper. Nice specs. Just because it doesn't work doesn't mean it isn't doing it's part for the glorious war effort of Mother Russia. It truly is a symbol of Russian manufacturing prowess, and the glorious battle tactics of the Russian generals. 

I would resist being a member of a Russian tank crew.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Foamy T. Squirrel said:

The T14 is great on paper. Nice specs. Just because it doesn't work doesn't mean it isn't doing it's part for the glorious war effort of Mother Russia. It truly is a symbol of Russian manufacturing prowess, and the glorious battle tactics of the Russian generals. 

I would resist being a member of a Russian tank crew.

 

 

Der Leopard 2 ist eine brillante Kampfmaschine. In hoher Fahrt im Gelände behält seine Kanone das Ziel fest im Visier. Ein Studien-Kollege arbeitet bei Krauss- Maffei und hat uns bei einem Treffen einmal erklärt wie das funktioniert.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/31/2023 at 7:35 AM, StarLight28 said:

 

Der Leopard 2 ist eine brillante Kampfmaschine. In hoher Fahrt im Gelände behält seine Kanone das Ziel fest im Visier. Ein Studien-Kollege arbeitet bei Krauss- Maffei und hat uns bei einem Treffen einmal erklärt wie das funktioniert.

 

Wow. You are correct about the T-14. I must have been listening to either too much Russian misinformation or too much US defense industry requests for more funding for their counter-measures to this glorious T-14 of the Motherland.

If you can understand the English and can skip past the commercials, this is an extremely good explanation of the T-14 and is written with tons of information and entertaining wit.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Foamy T. Squirrel said:

Wow. You are correct about the T-14. I must have been listening to either too much Russian misinformation or too much US defense industry requests for more funding for their counter-measures to this glorious T-14 of the Motherland.

If you can understand the English and can skip past the commercials, this is an extremely good explanation of the T-14 and is written with tons of information and entertaining wit.

 

I told you it was garbage yesterday.   But yeah the communist loon is a much better source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, maxfactor said:

I told you it was garbage yesterday.   But yeah the communist loon is a much better source.

You too, were correct. However, if more T-14s were in Ukraine, the NATO tanks would have a great opportunity for training their new tank recruits. So you see, it does have value.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkey_shoot

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...