Aussie_oi_oi Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 1 minute ago, Photic said: You're right, but the timing of it just seemed too good to me. I mean the site had already been active for about a week before I made my post here. But I acknowledge that it could just be a pure coincidence that they just happened the fix the exact issues I mentioned right after I mentioned them. In the ten years I’ve been observing, it’s clear they have consistently overlooked everything we've communicated in the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Photic Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 4 minutes ago, Aussie_oi_oi said: In the ten years I’ve been observing, it’s clear they have consistently overlooked everything we've communicated in the past. I figured they may monitor this topic more closely though since it relates to their new service that they just launched. They may be more interested in user feedback than they normally would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StnCld316 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 14 minutes ago, Photic said: I figured they may monitor this topic more closely though since it relates to their new service that they just launched. They may be more interested in user feedback than they normally would be. RLC only concerns themselves with images from their product that gets posted in the forums as it violates their terms of service agreement. If the poster has a RLC account they are usually banned and blacklisted. RLC does not monitor the posts what people post about their product or their tenants. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Photic Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 1 minute ago, StnCld316 said: RLC only concerns themselves with images from their product that gets posted in the forums as it violates their terms of service agreement. If the poster has a RLC account they are usually banned and blacklisted. RLC does not monitor the posts what people post about their product or their tenants. You may very well be correct about that. But we would have no way to know if they were monitoring certain topics either right? I'm just saying, they may not actually make public posts here but they could still monitor without even being logged in right? In which case how would we know what they are viewing? I have certainly seen some of the gals on RLC reading this website in the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StnCld316 Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 14 minutes ago, Photic said: You may very well be correct about that. But we would have no way to know if they were monitoring certain topics either right? I'm just saying, they may not actually make public posts here but they could still monitor without even being logged in right? In which case how would we know what they are viewing? I have certainly seen some of the gals on RLC reading this website in the past. Based on my extensive interactions with them over the years, I can confidently say that they probably pay little attention to the comments. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Photic Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 3 minutes ago, StnCld316 said: Based on my extensive interactions with them over the years, I can confidently say that they probably pay little attention to the comments. Well I won't argue the point. I'm sure you know better than I do. But nevertheless it is still quite the coincidence that they fixed what I pointed out in my post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie_oi_oi Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 36 minutes ago, Photic said: Well I won't argue the point. I'm sure you know better than I do. But nevertheless it is still quite the coincidence that they fixed what I pointed out in my post. I hope they did but I would bet on it. StnCld316 and I are speaking from many years of experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brit Guy Posted October 27 Share Posted October 27 On 10/26/2024 at 3:50 PM, HotWivesRock said: Ignoring the content of Xlife I like layout of the site including the mini video screen when you scroll. I think the subs idea is good but needs a lot of refining, If you want 1 or 3 apartments only that's good, but to see the whole site, at present you need to have multiple subs to do is way more (and to) expensive. They could have done all of the above on the existing site if they wanted, I think they are looking to expand and targeting a different market and in fairness the site has been active a couple of weeks. If you read the T & C's it gives you the opportunity to become a streamer, it also says the equipment to do so will be a your own expense, likewise the streamer can do content from outside, in fact where ever they chose with the disclaimer of not showing other people, not much to see there then but hotel rooms of course would be okay. That's a whole lot different to what RLC is today. It also mentions the introduction of tokens that you can buy to give to the streamer, one major rule of that is you will only be able to buy the token to donate at that time, no pre-buying of tokens, well if that isn't plans to make cam-shows part of the content I don't know how bigger clue you'd need. I agree that streaming in 4k would be a bonus for Xlife and RLC and wonder if some of the long downtime we've seen on some of the apartments recently has been for technical reasons such as upgrading the cameras ready for that in the near future. Will RLC disappear into to Xlife? well we wait and see. The growth in views for Xlife in 2 weeks appears to be doing okay, how many subs that have sold in something different, but then no different to how many subs RLC sell pro-rata to site views, only they know. https://www.ipaddress.com/website/xlife.com/ https://www.ipaddress.com/website/reallifecam.com/ I also checked out Camcaps on there lol. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
costa049 Posted October 30 Share Posted October 30 Following the opening of this new platform, GOVs are becoming more and more empty without any new hirings beyond Giorgia 1 week and a half ago, and there has been no replacement for Amalia and Mati since they left 3 months ago, not to mention Sara's stay, which can be a sign that the end of the GOV/ COV concept might be near. The whole concept and the apts, especially the villas, is very expensive to maintain, not to mention b1 is up almost since the beginning of RLC, and there have been hiring issues in the more recent years. Let's see how it will end and what they will do with the apts. until they reform RLC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomtom98989898 Posted October 30 Share Posted October 30 I just want them to add Angie's cam back to RLC, I do not like their new pricing structure, a bit greedy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie_oi_oi Posted October 31 Share Posted October 31 On 10/31/2024 at 3:24 AM, costa049 said: Following the opening of this new platform, GOVs are becoming more and more empty without any new hirings beyond Giorgia 1 week and a half ago, and there has been no replacement for Amalia and Mati since they left 3 months ago, not to mention Sara's stay, which can be a sign that the end of the GOV/ COV concept might be near. The whole concept and the apts, especially the villas, is very expensive to maintain, not to mention b1 is up almost since the beginning of RLC, and there have been hiring issues in the more recent years. Let's see how it will end and what they will do with the apts. until they reform RLC. The end is near. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aussie_oi_oi Posted October 31 Share Posted October 31 On 10/31/2024 at 4:15 AM, tomtom98989898 said: I just want them to add Angie's cam back to RLC, I do not like their new pricing structure, a bit greedy. A lot greedy. Pricing is way too high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts