Elli & Sayn (2025) #15

[Maxbell]

48 minutes ago, Epikouros said:

Can you copy/paste ChatGPT's condensed version of my post here? I'm a bit curious, and it might help some people too.🙂 

Thanks!

It’s free to use, I do not sign in or anything.
It asks you to sign in, just say no. 
‘Then ask it to
“summarize and condense the following passage: (paste it here)”
It will cut it in half at least. I am sure you can say “do this in x number of words” and see what happens. 

[Xarvaz]

lots of kisses and she doesn't push him away..well not now at least 😏

[ddhm]

It’s funny . As soon as Elli has her OFFICIAL freedom from the company she works for and marked as single , PERHAPS she’s teasing ua on how she’s gonna behave with guys entering the apartment 😏😈😋 ..

 

On the other hand , the worst for me as a man is being next to a girl that she’s cold and hot not just day by day , but hours per hours , half day she’s distant and now , realizing that she’s REALLY alone , she comes close to her ex boyfriend . Oh well , it is Elli 😁

[desinc]

53 minutes ago, Epikouros said:

Can you copy/paste ChatGPT's condensed version of my post here? I'm a bit curious, and it might help some people too.🙂 

Thanks!

 

Here you go...

From ChatGPT:

 

Andrew Tate is evil.

All people suck.

Male prostitution is not a viable career.

There's too many people in this world.

Once you have cellulite it's ok to get knocked up.

Rules were made to be broken.

 

... end of summary...

[Epikouros]

il y a 18 minutes, Maxbell a dit :

It’s free to use, I do not sign in or anything.
It asks you to sign in, just say no. 
‘Then ask it to
“summarize and condense the following passage: (paste it here)”
It will cut it in half at least. I am sure you can say “do this in x number of words” and see what happens. 

I know, I use ChatGPT as well sometimes (not for posting here, though).

It's just that if I do it, I will get a different version than you did, as would anyone else. ChatGPT & other AI models very rarely or never give exactly the same (textual) output, even when using identical prompts. So I was just wondering what you got, and thought it might be of use to people who don't like to read more than a few paragraphs.

I'm sure it left out the juicy/funny bits though, as it's unfortunately prone to censorship... 😉 

Maybe I'll let ChatGPT have a go at summarizing my post, using your prompt above, and post it here. That way you'll notice how big or small the differences are.

[Maxbell]

3 minutes ago, Epikouros said:

I know, I use ChatGPT as well sometimes (not for posting here, though).

It's just that if I do it, I will get a different version than you did, as would anyone else. ChatGPT & other AI models very rarely or never give exactly the same (textual) output, even when using identical prompts. So I was just wondering what you got, and thought it might be of use to people who don't like to read more than a few paragraphs.

I'm sure it left out the juicy/funny bits though, as it's unfortunately prone to censorship... 😉 

Maybe I'll let ChatGPT have a go at summarizing my post, using your prompt above, and post it here. That way you'll notice how big or small the differences are.

Yeah, I don’t trust AI at all.  If something tweaks my interest that I want to comment on, I’ll go back and read the original.   

‘Edit:  until AI proves it won’t run into pedestrians or drive cabs into police stand offs, lol, I will be very cautious. 

[Detrez]

Is he really going to chat with her while she prepares to go meet someone else? 

[Thestarider]

5 minutes ago, Detrez said:

Is he really going to chat with her while she prepares to go meet someone else? 

What a puss, my thoughts exactly.

[Epikouros]

il y a 12 minutes, Epikouros a dit :

I know, I use ChatGPT as well sometimes (not for posting here, though).

It's just that if I do it, I will get a different version than you did, as would anyone else. ChatGPT & other AI models very rarely or never give exactly the same (textual) output, even when using identical prompts. So I was just wondering what you got, and thought it might be of use to people who don't like to read more than a few paragraphs.

I'm sure it left out the juicy/funny bits though, as it's unfortunately prone to censorship... 😉 

Maybe I'll let ChatGPT have a go at summarizing my post, using your prompt above, and post it here. That way you'll notice how big or small the differences are.

This is what I got. Not bad actually, but it left out the more juicy/funny "bad language" details, as I supposed it would. Is it close to the version you got? Feel free to post it as well, if you want. :

 

Condensed summary:

The passage challenges the claim that women cheat more than men, arguing there is no credible evidence for it and that cheating rates are likely similar across genders. It reasons that alleged female infidelity must involve men who are also cheating, making the numbers roughly equal. Controlling a partner out of distrust undermines the value of a relationship, regardless of gender.

It criticizes manosphere narratives as rooted in insecurity, repression, or nostalgia for outdated patriarchal norms. The text also notes that men appear more likely to seek casual or transactional sex, as reflected in the higher demand for female prostitution.

Beyond relationships, it argues that humanity is not at risk of dying out, that having children is optional, and that delaying or avoiding parenthood can be valid. Finally, it claims humans are not naturally wired for lifelong sexual fidelity but are wired for jealousy, meaning monogamy relies largely on social and cultural constraints rather than instinct.

[Maxbell]

5 minutes ago, Epikouros said:

This is what I got. Not bad actually, but it left out the more juicy/funny "bad language" details, as I supposed it would. Is it close to the version you got? Feel free to post it as well, if you want. :

 

Condensed summary:

The passage challenges the claim that women cheat more than men, arguing there is no credible evidence for it and that cheating rates are likely similar across genders. It reasons that alleged female infidelity must involve men who are also cheating, making the numbers roughly equal. Controlling a partner out of distrust undermines the value of a relationship, regardless of gender.

It criticizes manosphere narratives as rooted in insecurity, repression, or nostalgia for outdated patriarchal norms. The text also notes that men appear more likely to seek casual or transactional sex, as reflected in the higher demand for female prostitution.

Beyond relationships, it argues that humanity is not at risk of dying out, that having children is optional, and that delaying or avoiding parenthood can be valid. Finally, it claims humans are not naturally wired for lifelong sexual fidelity but are wired for jealousy, meaning monogamy relies largely on social and cultural constraints rather than instinct.

The passage argues that claims from the “manosphere” about women cheating more than men lack scientific support and are rooted in insecurity and misogyny. It contends that men and women cheat at similar rates, since cheating necessarily involves both sexes, and that distrust and control undermine any meaningful relationship. The author criticizes manosphere culture as repressed, resentful, or immature, and notes that “bad boys” often cheat while maintaining official partners.

The text also points to higher demand for female prostitution as evidence of male sexual behavior, suggests overpopulation makes having children optional (or delaying parenthood preferable), and rejects religious or social pressure to reproduce. It adds a controversial view that pregnancy can harm women’s bodies, reinforcing the case for delaying or avoiding childbirth.

Overall, the author concludes that humans—regardless of gender—are not naturally sexually monogamous, but are naturally jealous; fidelity is maintained mainly through cultural, social, or religious constraints rather than biology.

[Maxbell]

@Epikouros you’re right.  They are different. That’s handy if your a student cheating, no two essays will be the same. 😁

[Epikouros]

il y a 6 minutes, Maxbell a dit :

 

The passage argues that claims from the “manosphere” about women cheating more than men lack scientific support and are rooted in insecurity and misogyny. It contends that men and women cheat at similar rates, since cheating necessarily involves both sexes, and that distrust and control undermine any meaningful relationship. The author criticizes manosphere culture as repressed, resentful, or immature, and notes that “bad boys” often cheat while maintaining official partners.

The text also points to higher demand for female prostitution as evidence of male sexual behavior, suggests overpopulation makes having children optional (or delaying parenthood preferable), and rejects religious or social pressure to reproduce. It adds a controversial view that pregnancy can harm women’s bodies, reinforcing the case for delaying or avoiding childbirth.

Overall, the author concludes that humans—regardless of gender—are not naturally sexually monogamous, but are naturally jealous; fidelity is maintained mainly through cultural, social, or religious constraints rather than biology.

Also not bad, but still different than the version I got.

However, some nuance (and censored stuff as well) disappeared from both versions.

To read the best version, you'll have to read my original, uncondensed post! 😁