B4 - General Topic 2026 #5 (January)

[thereala78]

12 minutes ago, Mauri said:

How disrespectful. You're the ones who have no respect for girls, you treat them like ball-draining objects, you expect more and more. Remember, you're not paying girls individually to entertain you sexually, you're paying to see people who live in apartments with cameras, where they're broadcast 24/7. Therefore, whatever they do, they do. No one has the right to tell them what they should or should do. It's their life, and they decide. If you don't like this or it doesn't meet your standards, go elsewhere.

Totally agree 🙂 👍

[thereala78]

34 minutes ago, luvdoggy1111 said:

Happy that they are back, but I still think it's ridiculous. Of course the girls deserve to get out some time for a short vacation. I got no problem with that. But five girls together at the same time? That is absolutely very bad for the paying viewers, almost without respect. 

I hope they will make it up with the viewers, my opinion of course. 

It was a chance for them to have fun together in a nice place... they enjoyed themselves...

I understand that this might be disappointing for the viewers...

But yes, I think and hope they'll make it up to the viewers 😉

[Xarvaz]

24 minutes ago, Maxbell said:

Now I know it was B4 that inspired Gelia 😉 

 

I wrote a while ago that she had painted Kaya, but I knew it was a self-portrait 

[Maxbell]

15 minutes ago, Xarvaz said:

I wrote a while ago that she had painted Kaya, but I knew it was a self-portrait 

Sorry, I can't tell if you are kidding? I am not always that quick on the up-take sometimes. 😉 
I assumed that was Gelia using herself as a model,  or a non-descript character but it does look like Kaya. But the circumstance are too wierd.

[Alladino]

50 minutes ago, Mauri said:

How disrespectful. You're the ones who have no respect for girls, you treat them like ball-draining objects, you expect more and more. Remember, you're not paying girls individually to entertain you sexually, you're paying to see people who live in apartments with cameras, where they're broadcast 24/7. Therefore, whatever they do, they do. No one has the right to tell them what they should or should do. It's their life, and they decide. If you don't like this or it doesn't meet your standards, go elsewhere.

 

It is definitely true that RLC is to blame if nothing happens in the apartments. At the same time I also think that 5 girls going on vacation at the same time is a shitty idea somehow. 

That would be fine if RLC had good girls in B1 and B2 but even there it's a dead end. 

 

[ddhm]

55 minutes ago, Mauri said:

Ma quale privo di rispetto. Siete voi che non avete rispetto per le ragazze, le trattate come oggetti svuota palle, vi aspetteta sempre di piu’, ricordatevi che non state pagando le ragazze simgolarmente per intrattenervi sessualmente, state pagando per vedere delle persone che vivono in appartamenti con delle telecamere, dove vengono trasmesse in rete H24, quindi, quello che fanno fanno, nessuno ha diritto di dire cosa devono o dovrebbero fare, la vita e’ loro, e decidono loro. Se questo non vi piace o non soddisfa i vosti canoni, andate altrove.

Vivi does things , she’s on cameras , B1 is her apartment and the ONLY thing you call her since a week or two after joining is a prostitute , a girl that she’s bad and whatever . And this message now of yours simply REFLECTS all , what more to say about you … really .. 

[Xarvaz]

7 minutes ago, Maxbell said:

Sorry, I can't tell if you are kidding? I am not always that quick on the up-take sometimes. 😉 
I assumed that was Gelia using herself as a model,  or a non-descript character but it does look like Kaya. But the circumstance are too wierd.

I wrote that when Kaya was lying in bed and was being watched through the window by two rats, and yes I saw how she took that photo, it is a pity that a girl who can be so cheerful has such sad thoughts

[Brit Guy]

1 hour ago, luvdoggy1111 said:

I hope they will make it up with the viewers

Yea they came back ...anything else is an extra ...not an entitlement remember. 

[luvdoggy1111]

1 minute ago, Alladino said:

 

It is definitely true that RLC is to blame if nothing happens in the apartments. At the same time I also think that 5 girls going on vacation at the same time is a shitty idea somehow. 

That would be fine if RLC had good girls in B1 and B2 but even there it's a dead end. 

 

Ah, did my favourite Italian said this about me? Ridiculous.

I just wanted to say that I think it's a very bad idea for the paying viewers that 5 tenants are on a vacation at the same time. I didn't mention any sexual things. He said literally: you're paying to see people who live in apartments with cameras. Yes!!! That's the point, they weren't there, remember? 

Btw this is not about you @Alladino

[Xarvaz]

3 minutes ago, luvdoggy1111 said:

Ah, did my favourite Italian said this about me? Ridiculous.

I just wanted to say that I think it's a very bad idea for the paying viewers that 5 tenants are on a vacation at the same time. I didn't mention any sexual things. He said literally: you're paying to see people who live in apartments with cameras. Yes!!! That's the point, they weren't there, remember? 

Btw this is not about you @Alladino

that's what happens when there is no more management and RLC leaves everything to the residents themselves, a good example is XLife where the management also leaves everything to the residents and it is now dead

[Brit Guy]

1 hour ago, Mauri said:

But what is disrespectful. It is you who have no respect for girls, you treat them as ball-emptying objects, you are waiting for you more and more, remember that you are not paying girls simgolarly to entertain you sexually, you are paying to see people who live in apartments with cameras, where they are broadcast on the net H24, therefore, what they do they do, no one has the right to say what they should or should do, Life is theirs, and they decide. If you don't like this or it doesn't meet your standards, go elsewhere.

Many seem to think nudity/sexual content on RLC is a basic requirement, when in fact it is not. I appreciate nudity and sexual content is what encourages viewers to auto-renew their subscriptions and what drives RLC forward BUT the participants are simply not objects of sexual gratification for the viewers. Personally, I'll 'mostly' respect a participant's decision if they choose to show little to no nudity ...if I like watching them of course. Yes, cameras are trained on all the beds but they are also trained on everywhere else ...meaning they are just placed where participants are likely to be seen and not what's expected to happen.  

[thereala78]

51 minutes ago, luvdoggy1111 said:

Ah, did my favourite Italian said this about me? Ridiculous.

I just wanted to say that I think it's a very bad idea for the paying viewers that 5 tenants are on a vacation at the same time. I didn't mention any sexual things. He said literally: you're paying to see people who live in apartments with cameras. Yes!!! That's the point, they weren't there, remember? 

Btw this is not about you @Alladino

It proves that RLC don't tell girls what they can do or not... they are free and it's a good thing for them... but less for us yes... 😁

But as it was pointed, if besides there were more interesting girls or events we wouldn't care about 5 tenants out of 19... 🙄

The issue is that except thanks to some girls, the quality is low atm... 😞 

And when they are out... nothing happens 🙂